diff mbox series

[RFC,v2,net-next,2/2] net: phy: sfp: enable i2c-bus detection on ACPI based systems

Message ID 20190507003557.40648-3-ruslan@babayev.com
State Superseded
Headers show
Series [RFC,v2,net-next,1/2] i2c: acpi: export i2c_acpi_find_adapter_by_handle | expand

Commit Message

Ruslan Babayev May 7, 2019, 12:35 a.m. UTC
Lookup I2C adapter using the "i2c-bus" device property on ACPI based
systems similar to how it's done with DT.

An example DSD describing an SFP on an ACPI based system:

Device (SFP0)
{
    Name (_HID, "PRP0001")
    Name (_CRS, ResourceTemplate()
    {
        GpioIo(Exclusive, PullDefault, 0, 0, IoRestrictionNone,
               "\\_SB.PCI0.RP01.GPIO", 0, ResourceConsumer)
            { 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 }
    })
    Name (_DSD, Package ()
    {
        ToUUID ("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
        Package () {
            Package () { "compatible", "sff,sfp" },
            Package () { "i2c-bus", \_SB.PCI0.RP01.I2C.MUX.CH0 },
            Package () { "maximum-power-milliwatt", 1000 },
            Package () { "tx-disable-gpios", Package () { ^SFP0, 0, 0, 1} },
            Package () { "reset-gpio",       Package () { ^SFP0, 0, 1, 1} },
            Package () { "mod-def0-gpios",   Package () { ^SFP0, 0, 2, 1} },
            Package () { "tx-fault-gpios",   Package () { ^SFP0, 0, 3, 0} },
            Package () { "los-gpios",        Package () { ^SFP0, 0, 4, 1} },
        },
    })
}

Device (PHY0)
{
    Name (_HID, "PRP0001")
    Name (_DSD, Package ()
    {
        ToUUID ("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
        Package () {
            Package () { "compatible", "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c45" },
            Package () { "sfp", \_SB.PCI0.RP01.SFP0 },
            Package () { "managed", "in-band-status" },
            Package () { "phy-mode", "sgmii" },
        },
    })
}

Signed-off-by: Ruslan Babayev <ruslan@babayev.com>
Cc: xe-linux-external@cisco.com
---
 drivers/net/phy/sfp.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Comments

Andrew Lunn May 7, 2019, 2:38 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 05:35:57PM -0700, Ruslan Babayev wrote:
> Lookup I2C adapter using the "i2c-bus" device property on ACPI based
> systems similar to how it's done with DT.
> 
> An example DSD describing an SFP on an ACPI based system:
> 
> Device (SFP0)
> {
>     Name (_HID, "PRP0001")
>     Name (_CRS, ResourceTemplate()
>     {
>         GpioIo(Exclusive, PullDefault, 0, 0, IoRestrictionNone,
>                "\\_SB.PCI0.RP01.GPIO", 0, ResourceConsumer)
>             { 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 }
>     })
>     Name (_DSD, Package ()
>     {
>         ToUUID ("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
>         Package () {
>             Package () { "compatible", "sff,sfp" },
>             Package () { "i2c-bus", \_SB.PCI0.RP01.I2C.MUX.CH0 },
>             Package () { "maximum-power-milliwatt", 1000 },
>             Package () { "tx-disable-gpios", Package () { ^SFP0, 0, 0, 1} },
>             Package () { "reset-gpio",       Package () { ^SFP0, 0, 1, 1} },
>             Package () { "mod-def0-gpios",   Package () { ^SFP0, 0, 2, 1} },
>             Package () { "tx-fault-gpios",   Package () { ^SFP0, 0, 3, 0} },
>             Package () { "los-gpios",        Package () { ^SFP0, 0, 4, 1} },
>         },

As i said before, i know ~0 about ACPI. Does devm_gpiod_get() just
work for ACPI?

Thanks
	Andrew
Ruslan Babayev (fib) May 7, 2019, 3:15 a.m. UTC | #2
> As i said before, i know ~0 about ACPI. Does devm_gpiod_get() just
> work for ACPI?
> Thanks
>        Andrew

It does.

Regards,
Ruslan
Ruslan Babayev (fib) May 22, 2019, 7:29 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi Andrew,

Just wanted to follow up on the patch. Does it look good? Do you have any other feedback, concerns with this patch?

Thanks,
Ruslan
Andrew Lunn May 24, 2019, 8:23 p.m. UTC | #4
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 07:29:06PM +0000, Ruslan Babayev (fib) wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> Just wanted to follow up on the patch. Does it look good? Do you have any other feedback, concerns with this patch?

Hi Ruslan

From what i remember, it is O.K.

I will review it again when you repost it.

  Andrew
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
index d4635c2178d1..7a6c8df8899b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
 #include <linux/phy.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
@@ -1783,6 +1784,7 @@  static int sfp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	const struct sff_data *sff;
 	struct sfp *sfp;
+	struct i2c_adapter *i2c = NULL;
 	bool poll = false;
 	int irq, err, i;
 
@@ -1801,7 +1803,6 @@  static int sfp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
 		struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
 		const struct of_device_id *id;
-		struct i2c_adapter *i2c;
 		struct device_node *np;
 
 		id = of_match_node(sfp_of_match, node);
@@ -1818,14 +1819,30 @@  static int sfp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 		i2c = of_find_i2c_adapter_by_node(np);
 		of_node_put(np);
-		if (!i2c)
-			return -EPROBE_DEFER;
-
-		err = sfp_i2c_configure(sfp, i2c);
-		if (err < 0) {
-			i2c_put_adapter(i2c);
-			return err;
+	} else if (ACPI_COMPANION(&pdev->dev)) {
+		struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(&pdev->dev);
+		struct fwnode_handle *fw = acpi_fwnode_handle(adev);
+		struct fwnode_reference_args args;
+		struct acpi_handle *acpi_handle;
+		int ret;
+
+		ret = acpi_node_get_property_reference(fw, "i2c-bus", 0, &args);
+		if (ACPI_FAILURE(ret) || !is_acpi_device_node(args.fwnode)) {
+			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "missing 'i2c-bus' property\n");
+			return -ENODEV;
 		}
+
+		acpi_handle = ACPI_HANDLE_FWNODE(args.fwnode);
+		i2c = i2c_acpi_find_adapter_by_handle(acpi_handle);
+	}
+
+	if (!i2c)
+		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+
+	err = sfp_i2c_configure(sfp, i2c);
+	if (err < 0) {
+		i2c_put_adapter(i2c);
+		return err;
 	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < GPIO_MAX; i++)