diff mbox series

[2/4] rtc: digicolor: set range

Message ID 20190430093212.28425-2-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com
State Accepted
Headers show
Series [1/4] rtc: digicolor: fix possible race condition | expand

Commit Message

Alexandre Belloni April 30, 2019, 9:32 a.m. UTC
While the range of REFERENCE + TIME is actually 33 bits, the counter
itself (TIME) is a 32-bits seconds counter.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Baruch Siach April 30, 2019, 11:36 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Alexandre,

On Tue, Apr 30 2019, Alexandre Belloni wrote:

> While the range of REFERENCE + TIME is actually 33 bits, the counter
> itself (TIME) is a 32-bits seconds counter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
> ---
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c
> index 5bb14c56bc9a..e6e16aaac254 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c
> @@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ static int __init dc_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rtc);
>  
>  	rtc->rtc_dev->ops = &dc_rtc_ops;
> +	rtc->rtc_dev->range_max = U32_MAX;

Where can I find documentation on the meaning and usage of the range_max
value? I could not find anything in the kernel source.

baruch

>  
>  	return rtc_register_device(rtc->rtc_dev);
>  }
Alexandre Belloni April 30, 2019, 11:47 a.m. UTC | #2
On 30/04/2019 14:36:24+0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi Alexandre,
> 
> On Tue, Apr 30 2019, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> 
> > While the range of REFERENCE + TIME is actually 33 bits, the counter
> > itself (TIME) is a 32-bits seconds counter.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c
> > index 5bb14c56bc9a..e6e16aaac254 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c
> > @@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ static int __init dc_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rtc);
> >  
> >  	rtc->rtc_dev->ops = &dc_rtc_ops;
> > +	rtc->rtc_dev->range_max = U32_MAX;
> 
> Where can I find documentation on the meaning and usage of the range_max
> value? I could not find anything in the kernel source.
> 

It should be set to the maximum UNIX timestamp the RTC can be set to
while keeping range_min to range_max contiguous.

In the digicolor case, you could go up to 8589934590 (Wed Mar 16
12:56:30 UTC 2242) but the driver only writes DC_RTC_REFERENCE and I'm
not sure it can also update DC_RTC_TIME safely.
Baruch Siach April 30, 2019, 12:20 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi Alexandre,

On Tue, Apr 30 2019, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 30/04/2019 14:36:24+0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
>> Hi Alexandre,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 30 2019, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>>
>> > While the range of REFERENCE + TIME is actually 33 bits, the counter
>> > itself (TIME) is a 32-bits seconds counter.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c | 1 +
>> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c
>> > index 5bb14c56bc9a..e6e16aaac254 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c
>> > @@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ static int __init dc_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> >  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rtc);
>> >
>> >  	rtc->rtc_dev->ops = &dc_rtc_ops;
>> > +	rtc->rtc_dev->range_max = U32_MAX;
>>
>> Where can I find documentation on the meaning and usage of the range_max
>> value? I could not find anything in the kernel source.
>
> It should be set to the maximum UNIX timestamp the RTC can be set to
> while keeping range_min to range_max contiguous.
>
> In the digicolor case, you could go up to 8589934590 (Wed Mar 16
> 12:56:30 UTC 2242) but the driver only writes DC_RTC_REFERENCE and I'm
> not sure it can also update DC_RTC_TIME safely.

DC_RTC_TIME resets to zero whenever dc_rtc_write writes CMD_RESET to the
DC_RTC_CONTROL register. DC_RTC_REFERENCE keeps the value that
dc_rtc_write stores there. So the driver will return values larger than
U32_MAX if you happen to cross this point in time between dc_rtc_write
and dc_rtc_read. But you can't store a value larger than U32_MAX in
DC_RTC_REFERENCE.

Will the core RTC code handle the U32_MAX cross correctly?

baruch

--
     http://baruch.siach.name/blog/                  ~. .~   Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
   - baruch@tkos.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -
Alexandre Belloni April 30, 2019, 1:05 p.m. UTC | #4
On 30/04/2019 15:20:08+0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi Alexandre,
> 
> On Tue, Apr 30 2019, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > On 30/04/2019 14:36:24+0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> >> Hi Alexandre,
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 30 2019, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> >>
> >> > While the range of REFERENCE + TIME is actually 33 bits, the counter
> >> > itself (TIME) is a 32-bits seconds counter.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
> >> > ---
> >> >  drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c | 1 +
> >> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c
> >> > index 5bb14c56bc9a..e6e16aaac254 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c
> >> > @@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ static int __init dc_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> >  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rtc);
> >> >
> >> >  	rtc->rtc_dev->ops = &dc_rtc_ops;
> >> > +	rtc->rtc_dev->range_max = U32_MAX;
> >>
> >> Where can I find documentation on the meaning and usage of the range_max
> >> value? I could not find anything in the kernel source.
> >
> > It should be set to the maximum UNIX timestamp the RTC can be set to
> > while keeping range_min to range_max contiguous.
> >
> > In the digicolor case, you could go up to 8589934590 (Wed Mar 16
> > 12:56:30 UTC 2242) but the driver only writes DC_RTC_REFERENCE and I'm
> > not sure it can also update DC_RTC_TIME safely.
> 
> DC_RTC_TIME resets to zero whenever dc_rtc_write writes CMD_RESET to the
> DC_RTC_CONTROL register. DC_RTC_REFERENCE keeps the value that
> dc_rtc_write stores there. So the driver will return values larger than
> U32_MAX if you happen to cross this point in time between dc_rtc_write
> and dc_rtc_read. But you can't store a value larger than U32_MAX in
> DC_RTC_REFERENCE.
> 
> Will the core RTC code handle the U32_MAX cross correctly?
> 

Yes, this is ok to return a valid value that is higher than range_max.
However, at that time, you will not be able to set any alarms anymore as
the core doesn't allow to set alarms after range_max.

I would think that this is fine because this will happen in 2106 and we
have a way to offset the time (the whole goal of setting the range)
using device tree.
Baruch Siach April 30, 2019, 3:25 p.m. UTC | #5
Hi Alexandre,

On Tue, Apr 30 2019, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 30/04/2019 15:20:08+0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 30 2019, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>> > On 30/04/2019 14:36:24+0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
>> >> Hi Alexandre,
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Apr 30 2019, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > While the range of REFERENCE + TIME is actually 33 bits, the counter
>> >> > itself (TIME) is a 32-bits seconds counter.
>> >> >
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
>> >> > ---
>> >> >  drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c | 1 +
>> >> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> >> >
>> >> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c
>> >> > index 5bb14c56bc9a..e6e16aaac254 100644
>> >> > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c
>> >> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c
>> >> > @@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ static int __init dc_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> >> >  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rtc);
>> >> >
>> >> >  	rtc->rtc_dev->ops = &dc_rtc_ops;
>> >> > +	rtc->rtc_dev->range_max = U32_MAX;
>> >>
>> >> Where can I find documentation on the meaning and usage of the range_max
>> >> value? I could not find anything in the kernel source.
>> >
>> > It should be set to the maximum UNIX timestamp the RTC can be set to
>> > while keeping range_min to range_max contiguous.
>> >
>> > In the digicolor case, you could go up to 8589934590 (Wed Mar 16
>> > 12:56:30 UTC 2242) but the driver only writes DC_RTC_REFERENCE and I'm
>> > not sure it can also update DC_RTC_TIME safely.
>> 
>> DC_RTC_TIME resets to zero whenever dc_rtc_write writes CMD_RESET to the
>> DC_RTC_CONTROL register. DC_RTC_REFERENCE keeps the value that
>> dc_rtc_write stores there. So the driver will return values larger than
>> U32_MAX if you happen to cross this point in time between dc_rtc_write
>> and dc_rtc_read. But you can't store a value larger than U32_MAX in
>> DC_RTC_REFERENCE.
>> 
>> Will the core RTC code handle the U32_MAX cross correctly?
>
> Yes, this is ok to return a valid value that is higher than range_max.
> However, at that time, you will not be able to set any alarms anymore as
> the core doesn't allow to set alarms after range_max.
>
> I would think that this is fine because this will happen in 2106 and we
> have a way to offset the time (the whole goal of setting the range)
> using device tree.

That's the sort of documentation that I'm missing. The 'start-year'
property is mentioned in the DT binding documentation. But I don't see
where range_max is documented as a facility for the time offset feature.

Anyway,

Acked-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>

Thanks,
baruch
Alexandre Belloni April 30, 2019, 7:10 p.m. UTC | #6
On 30/04/2019 18:25:52+0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > Yes, this is ok to return a valid value that is higher than range_max.
> > However, at that time, you will not be able to set any alarms anymore as
> > the core doesn't allow to set alarms after range_max.
> >
> > I would think that this is fine because this will happen in 2106 and we
> > have a way to offset the time (the whole goal of setting the range)
> > using device tree.
> 
> That's the sort of documentation that I'm missing. The 'start-year'
> property is mentioned in the DT binding documentation. But I don't see
> where range_max is documented as a facility for the time offset feature.
> 

Sure, I'm planning to document better how a proper RTC driver should be
written. I needed to cleanup the digicolor driver because I4m removing
.set_mmss and .set_mmss64 this cycle.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c
index 5bb14c56bc9a..e6e16aaac254 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c
@@ -206,6 +206,7 @@  static int __init dc_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rtc);
 
 	rtc->rtc_dev->ops = &dc_rtc_ops;
+	rtc->rtc_dev->range_max = U32_MAX;
 
 	return rtc_register_device(rtc->rtc_dev);
 }