Comments
Patch
@@ -78,9 +78,13 @@ void qemu_sglist_destroy(QEMUSGList *qsg)
qemu_free(qsg->sg);
}
-typedef struct {
+typedef struct DMAAIOCB DMAAIOCB;
+
+struct DMAAIOCB {
BlockDriverAIOCB common;
- BlockDriverState *bs;
+ union {
+ BlockDriverState *bs;
+ } u;
BlockDriverAIOCB *acb;
QEMUSGList *sg;
uint64_t sector_num;
@@ -88,9 +92,8 @@ typedef struct {
QEMUIOVector iov;
QEMUBH *bh;
DMAIOFunc *io_func;
-} DMAAIOCB;
-
-static int dma_bdrv_cb(DMAAIOCB *opaque, int ret);
+ int (*cb)(DMAAIOCB *, int);
+};
static void dma_bdrv_unmap(DMAAIOCB *dbs)
{
@@ -122,11 +125,11 @@ static BlockDriverAIOCB *dma_continue(DMAAIOCB *dbs, int ret)
{
assert(ret != -EAGAIN);
if (ret == 0) {
- /* No error so far, try doing more DMA. If dma_bdrv_cb starts an
+ /* No error so far, try doing more DMA. If dbs->cb starts an
asynchronous operation, it returns -EAGAIN and we will be
called again by either reschedule_dma or dma_bdrv_aio_cb.
If not, call the BlockDriverCompletionFunc. */
- ret = dma_bdrv_cb(dbs, ret);
+ ret = dbs->cb(dbs, ret);
}
if (ret != -EAGAIN) {
dma_complete(dbs, ret);
@@ -180,7 +183,7 @@ static int dma_bdrv_cb(DMAAIOCB *dbs, int ret)
return -EAGAIN;
}
- dbs->acb = dbs->io_func(dbs->bs, dbs->sector_num, &dbs->iov,
+ dbs->acb = dbs->io_func(dbs->u.bs, dbs->sector_num, &dbs->iov,
dbs->iov.size / 512, dma_bdrv_aio_cb, dbs);
if (!dbs->acb) {
dbs->common.cb = NULL;
@@ -216,12 +219,13 @@ BlockDriverAIOCB *dma_bdrv_io(
DMAAIOCB *dbs = qemu_aio_get(&dma_aio_pool, bs, cb, opaque);
dbs->acb = NULL;
- dbs->bs = bs;
+ dbs->u.bs = bs;
dbs->sg = sg;
dbs->sector_num = sector_num;
dbs->is_write = is_write;
dbs->io_func = io_func;
dbs->bh = NULL;
+ dbs->cb = dma_bdrv_cb;
qemu_iovec_init(&dbs->iov, sg->nsg);
qemu_sglist_rewind(sg);
return dma_continue(dbs, 0);
Store in the AIOCB which callback function we are using, and abstract the process of starting DMA. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> --- dma-helpers.c | 22 +++++++++++++--------- 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)