| Message ID | 20190412102738.12679-2-leo.yan@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | CoreSight: Support static funnel with DT binding consolidation | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| robh/checkpatch | success |
On 04/12/2019 11:27 AM, Leo Yan wrote: > CoreSight uses below bindings for replicator: > > Dynamic replicator, aka. configurable replicator: > "arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator", "arm,primecell"; > > Static replicator, aka. non-configurable replicator: > "arm,coresight-replicator"; > > The compatible string "arm,coresight-replicator" is not an explicit > naming to express the replicator is 'static'. To unify the naming > convention, this patch introduces a new compatible string > "arm,coresight-static-replicator" for the static replicator; the > compatible string "arm,coresight-replicator" is kept for backward > compatibility, but tag it as obsolete and suggest to use the new > compatible string. > > As result CoreSight replicator have below bindings: > > Dynamic replicator: > "arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator", "arm,primecell"; > > Static replicator: > "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; > "arm,coresight-replicator"; (obsolete) > > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt | 7 +++++-- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > index f8aff65ab921..d02d160fa8ac 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > @@ -69,7 +69,10 @@ its hardware characteristcs. > > * compatible: Currently supported value is (note the absence of the > AMBA markee): > - - "arm,coresight-replicator" > + - Coresight Non-configurable Replicator: > + "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; > + "arm,coresight-replicator"; (OBSOLETE. For backward > + compatibility and will be removed) > > * port or ports: see "Graph bindings for Coresight" below. > > @@ -169,7 +172,7 @@ Example: > /* non-configurable replicators don't show up on the > * AMBA bus. As such no need to add "arm,primecell". > */ > - compatible = "arm,coresight-replicator"; > + compatible = "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 11:40:13AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > On 04/12/2019 11:27 AM, Leo Yan wrote: > > CoreSight uses below bindings for replicator: > > > > Dynamic replicator, aka. configurable replicator: > > "arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator", "arm,primecell"; > > > > Static replicator, aka. non-configurable replicator: > > "arm,coresight-replicator"; > > > > The compatible string "arm,coresight-replicator" is not an explicit > > naming to express the replicator is 'static'. To unify the naming > > convention, this patch introduces a new compatible string > > "arm,coresight-static-replicator" for the static replicator; the > > compatible string "arm,coresight-replicator" is kept for backward > > compatibility, but tag it as obsolete and suggest to use the new > > compatible string. > > > > As result CoreSight replicator have below bindings: > > > > Dynamic replicator: > > "arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator", "arm,primecell"; > > > > Static replicator: > > "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; > > "arm,coresight-replicator"; (obsolete) > > > > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt | 7 +++++-- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > > index f8aff65ab921..d02d160fa8ac 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > > @@ -69,7 +69,10 @@ its hardware characteristcs. > > * compatible: Currently supported value is (note the absence of the > > AMBA markee): > > - - "arm,coresight-replicator" > > + - Coresight Non-configurable Replicator: > > + "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; > > + "arm,coresight-replicator"; (OBSOLETE. For backward > > + compatibility and will be removed) > > * port or ports: see "Graph bindings for Coresight" below. > > @@ -169,7 +172,7 @@ Example: > > /* non-configurable replicators don't show up on the > > * AMBA bus. As such no need to add "arm,primecell". > > */ > > - compatible = "arm,coresight-replicator"; > > + compatible = "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; > > Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Thanks a lot for quick reviewing, Suzuki.
Hi Leo, On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 at 04:28, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> wrote: > > CoreSight uses below bindings for replicator: > > Dynamic replicator, aka. configurable replicator: > "arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator", "arm,primecell"; > > Static replicator, aka. non-configurable replicator: > "arm,coresight-replicator"; > > The compatible string "arm,coresight-replicator" is not an explicit > naming to express the replicator is 'static'. To unify the naming > convention, this patch introduces a new compatible string > "arm,coresight-static-replicator" for the static replicator; the > compatible string "arm,coresight-replicator" is kept for backward > compatibility, but tag it as obsolete and suggest to use the new > compatible string. > > As result CoreSight replicator have below bindings: > > Dynamic replicator: > "arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator", "arm,primecell"; > > Static replicator: > "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; > "arm,coresight-replicator"; (obsolete) > > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt | 7 +++++-- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > index f8aff65ab921..d02d160fa8ac 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > @@ -69,7 +69,10 @@ its hardware characteristcs. > > * compatible: Currently supported value is (note the absence of the > AMBA markee): > - - "arm,coresight-replicator" > + - Coresight Non-configurable Replicator: > + "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; > + "arm,coresight-replicator"; (OBSOLETE. For backward > + compatibility and will be removed) > > * port or ports: see "Graph bindings for Coresight" below. > > @@ -169,7 +172,7 @@ Example: > /* non-configurable replicators don't show up on the > * AMBA bus. As such no need to add "arm,primecell". > */ > - compatible = "arm,coresight-replicator"; > + compatible = "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; > > out-ports { > #address-cells = <1>; > -- > 2.17.1 Since this is a binding patch it needs to be sent on its own. >
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 02:18:40PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > Hi Leo, > > On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 at 04:28, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > CoreSight uses below bindings for replicator: > > > > Dynamic replicator, aka. configurable replicator: > > "arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator", "arm,primecell"; > > > > Static replicator, aka. non-configurable replicator: > > "arm,coresight-replicator"; > > > > The compatible string "arm,coresight-replicator" is not an explicit > > naming to express the replicator is 'static'. To unify the naming > > convention, this patch introduces a new compatible string > > "arm,coresight-static-replicator" for the static replicator; the > > compatible string "arm,coresight-replicator" is kept for backward > > compatibility, but tag it as obsolete and suggest to use the new > > compatible string. > > > > As result CoreSight replicator have below bindings: > > > > Dynamic replicator: > > "arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator", "arm,primecell"; > > > > Static replicator: > > "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; > > "arm,coresight-replicator"; (obsolete) > > > > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt | 7 +++++-- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > > index f8aff65ab921..d02d160fa8ac 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > > @@ -69,7 +69,10 @@ its hardware characteristcs. > > > > * compatible: Currently supported value is (note the absence of the > > AMBA markee): > > - - "arm,coresight-replicator" > > + - Coresight Non-configurable Replicator: > > + "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; > > + "arm,coresight-replicator"; (OBSOLETE. For backward > > + compatibility and will be removed) > > > > * port or ports: see "Graph bindings for Coresight" below. > > > > @@ -169,7 +172,7 @@ Example: > > /* non-configurable replicators don't show up on the > > * AMBA bus. As such no need to add "arm,primecell". > > */ > > - compatible = "arm,coresight-replicator"; > > + compatible = "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; > > > > out-ports { > > #address-cells = <1>; > > -- > > 2.17.1 > > Since this is a binding patch it needs to be sent on its own. Thanks for reminding, Mathieu. Since this is the second time you remind me to send DT binding related patches separately, so I may misunderstand your meaning and want to get clarification to avoid making the same mistake for many times. Before I remembered in one patch set we need to organise patches with sending document patch (or document changing patch) ahead and then followed by the corresponding code change patch. So this can give the reviewers more clear context; and this also can present the merging dependency between document change patches and the code change patches. This is the rule I followed in this patch set and I sent to CoreSight and DT maintainers (and mailing lists) together. Please let me know what you think about this? And also welcome Rob/Mark's suggestions. Thanks, Leo Yan
On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 18:10, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 02:18:40PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > Hi Leo, > > > > On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 at 04:28, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > > > CoreSight uses below bindings for replicator: > > > > > > Dynamic replicator, aka. configurable replicator: > > > "arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator", "arm,primecell"; > > > > > > Static replicator, aka. non-configurable replicator: > > > "arm,coresight-replicator"; > > > > > > The compatible string "arm,coresight-replicator" is not an explicit > > > naming to express the replicator is 'static'. To unify the naming > > > convention, this patch introduces a new compatible string > > > "arm,coresight-static-replicator" for the static replicator; the > > > compatible string "arm,coresight-replicator" is kept for backward > > > compatibility, but tag it as obsolete and suggest to use the new > > > compatible string. > > > > > > As result CoreSight replicator have below bindings: > > > > > > Dynamic replicator: > > > "arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator", "arm,primecell"; > > > > > > Static replicator: > > > "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; > > > "arm,coresight-replicator"; (obsolete) > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> > > > --- > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt | 7 +++++-- > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > > > index f8aff65ab921..d02d160fa8ac 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > > > @@ -69,7 +69,10 @@ its hardware characteristcs. > > > > > > * compatible: Currently supported value is (note the absence of the > > > AMBA markee): > > > - - "arm,coresight-replicator" > > > + - Coresight Non-configurable Replicator: > > > + "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; > > > + "arm,coresight-replicator"; (OBSOLETE. For backward > > > + compatibility and will be removed) > > > > > > * port or ports: see "Graph bindings for Coresight" below. > > > > > > @@ -169,7 +172,7 @@ Example: > > > /* non-configurable replicators don't show up on the > > > * AMBA bus. As such no need to add "arm,primecell". > > > */ > > > - compatible = "arm,coresight-replicator"; > > > + compatible = "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; > > > > > > out-ports { > > > #address-cells = <1>; > > > -- > > > 2.17.1 > > > > Since this is a binding patch it needs to be sent on its own. > > Thanks for reminding, Mathieu. > > Since this is the second time you remind me to send DT binding related > patches separately, so I may misunderstand your meaning and want to get > clarification to avoid making the same mistake for many times. > > Before I remembered in one patch set we need to organise patches with > sending document patch (or document changing patch) ahead and then > followed by the corresponding code change patch. So this can give the > reviewers more clear context; and this also can present the merging > dependency between document change patches and the code change patches. > > This is the rule I followed in this patch set and I sent to CoreSight > and DT maintainers (and mailing lists) together. > > Please let me know what you think about this? And also welcome > Rob/Mark's suggestions. https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt > > Thanks, > Leo Yan
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 07:57:50AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 18:10, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 02:18:40PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > > Hi Leo, > > > > > > On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 at 04:28, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > CoreSight uses below bindings for replicator: > > > > > > > > Dynamic replicator, aka. configurable replicator: > > > > "arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator", "arm,primecell"; > > > > > > > > Static replicator, aka. non-configurable replicator: > > > > "arm,coresight-replicator"; > > > > > > > > The compatible string "arm,coresight-replicator" is not an explicit > > > > naming to express the replicator is 'static'. To unify the naming > > > > convention, this patch introduces a new compatible string > > > > "arm,coresight-static-replicator" for the static replicator; the > > > > compatible string "arm,coresight-replicator" is kept for backward > > > > compatibility, but tag it as obsolete and suggest to use the new > > > > compatible string. > > > > > > > > As result CoreSight replicator have below bindings: > > > > > > > > Dynamic replicator: > > > > "arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator", "arm,primecell"; > > > > > > > > Static replicator: > > > > "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; > > > > "arm,coresight-replicator"; (obsolete) > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> > > > > --- > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt | 7 +++++-- > > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > > > > index f8aff65ab921..d02d160fa8ac 100644 > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > > > > @@ -69,7 +69,10 @@ its hardware characteristcs. > > > > > > > > * compatible: Currently supported value is (note the absence of the > > > > AMBA markee): > > > > - - "arm,coresight-replicator" > > > > + - Coresight Non-configurable Replicator: > > > > + "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; > > > > + "arm,coresight-replicator"; (OBSOLETE. For backward > > > > + compatibility and will be removed) > > > > > > > > * port or ports: see "Graph bindings for Coresight" below. > > > > > > > > @@ -169,7 +172,7 @@ Example: > > > > /* non-configurable replicators don't show up on the > > > > * AMBA bus. As such no need to add "arm,primecell". > > > > */ > > > > - compatible = "arm,coresight-replicator"; > > > > + compatible = "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; > > > > > > > > out-ports { > > > > #address-cells = <1>; > > > > -- > > > > 2.17.1 > > > > > > Since this is a binding patch it needs to be sent on its own. > > > > Thanks for reminding, Mathieu. > > > > Since this is the second time you remind me to send DT binding related > > patches separately, so I may misunderstand your meaning and want to get > > clarification to avoid making the same mistake for many times. > > > > Before I remembered in one patch set we need to organise patches with > > sending document patch (or document changing patch) ahead and then > > followed by the corresponding code change patch. So this can give the > > reviewers more clear context; and this also can present the merging > > dependency between document change patches and the code change patches. > > > > This is the rule I followed in this patch set and I sent to CoreSight > > and DT maintainers (and mailing lists) together. > > > > Please let me know what you think about this? And also welcome > > Rob/Mark's suggestions. > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt I'm not clear on what you are asking for. Binding patches should be separate patch, but can and should still be in a series if there's relevant code changes. Rob
On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 18:27:35 +0800, Leo Yan wrote: > CoreSight uses below bindings for replicator: > > Dynamic replicator, aka. configurable replicator: > "arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator", "arm,primecell"; > > Static replicator, aka. non-configurable replicator: > "arm,coresight-replicator"; > > The compatible string "arm,coresight-replicator" is not an explicit > naming to express the replicator is 'static'. To unify the naming > convention, this patch introduces a new compatible string > "arm,coresight-static-replicator" for the static replicator; the > compatible string "arm,coresight-replicator" is kept for backward > compatibility, but tag it as obsolete and suggest to use the new > compatible string. > > As result CoreSight replicator have below bindings: > > Dynamic replicator: > "arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator", "arm,primecell"; > > Static replicator: > "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; > "arm,coresight-replicator"; (obsolete) > > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt | 7 +++++-- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 09:25:07AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 07:57:50AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 18:10, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 02:18:40PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > > > Hi Leo, > > > > > > > > On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 at 04:28, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > CoreSight uses below bindings for replicator: > > > > > > > > > > Dynamic replicator, aka. configurable replicator: > > > > > "arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator", "arm,primecell"; > > > > > > > > > > Static replicator, aka. non-configurable replicator: > > > > > "arm,coresight-replicator"; > > > > > > > > > > The compatible string "arm,coresight-replicator" is not an explicit > > > > > naming to express the replicator is 'static'. To unify the naming > > > > > convention, this patch introduces a new compatible string > > > > > "arm,coresight-static-replicator" for the static replicator; the > > > > > compatible string "arm,coresight-replicator" is kept for backward > > > > > compatibility, but tag it as obsolete and suggest to use the new > > > > > compatible string. > > > > > > > > > > As result CoreSight replicator have below bindings: > > > > > > > > > > Dynamic replicator: > > > > > "arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator", "arm,primecell"; > > > > > > > > > > Static replicator: > > > > > "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; > > > > > "arm,coresight-replicator"; (obsolete) > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> > > > > > --- > > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt | 7 +++++-- > > > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > > > > > index f8aff65ab921..d02d160fa8ac 100644 > > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > > > > > @@ -69,7 +69,10 @@ its hardware characteristcs. > > > > > > > > > > * compatible: Currently supported value is (note the absence of the > > > > > AMBA markee): > > > > > - - "arm,coresight-replicator" > > > > > + - Coresight Non-configurable Replicator: > > > > > + "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; > > > > > + "arm,coresight-replicator"; (OBSOLETE. For backward > > > > > + compatibility and will be removed) > > > > > > > > > > * port or ports: see "Graph bindings for Coresight" below. > > > > > > > > > > @@ -169,7 +172,7 @@ Example: > > > > > /* non-configurable replicators don't show up on the > > > > > * AMBA bus. As such no need to add "arm,primecell". > > > > > */ > > > > > - compatible = "arm,coresight-replicator"; > > > > > + compatible = "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; > > > > > > > > > > out-ports { > > > > > #address-cells = <1>; > > > > > -- > > > > > 2.17.1 > > > > > > > > Since this is a binding patch it needs to be sent on its own. > > > > > > Thanks for reminding, Mathieu. > > > > > > Since this is the second time you remind me to send DT binding related > > > patches separately, so I may misunderstand your meaning and want to get > > > clarification to avoid making the same mistake for many times. > > > > > > Before I remembered in one patch set we need to organise patches with > > > sending document patch (or document changing patch) ahead and then > > > followed by the corresponding code change patch. So this can give the > > > reviewers more clear context; and this also can present the merging > > > dependency between document change patches and the code change patches. > > > > > > This is the rule I followed in this patch set and I sent to CoreSight > > > and DT maintainers (and mailing lists) together. > > > > > > Please let me know what you think about this? And also welcome > > > Rob/Mark's suggestions. > > > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt > > I'm not clear on what you are asking for. Binding patches should be > separate patch, but can and should still be in a series if there's > relevant code changes. The fault is mine - I reviewed Leo's patchset while seriously jet lagged and sent him in the weeds. Apologies for the confusion. Mathieu > > Rob
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt index f8aff65ab921..d02d160fa8ac 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt @@ -69,7 +69,10 @@ its hardware characteristcs. * compatible: Currently supported value is (note the absence of the AMBA markee): - - "arm,coresight-replicator" + - Coresight Non-configurable Replicator: + "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; + "arm,coresight-replicator"; (OBSOLETE. For backward + compatibility and will be removed) * port or ports: see "Graph bindings for Coresight" below. @@ -169,7 +172,7 @@ Example: /* non-configurable replicators don't show up on the * AMBA bus. As such no need to add "arm,primecell". */ - compatible = "arm,coresight-replicator"; + compatible = "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; out-ports { #address-cells = <1>;
CoreSight uses below bindings for replicator: Dynamic replicator, aka. configurable replicator: "arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator", "arm,primecell"; Static replicator, aka. non-configurable replicator: "arm,coresight-replicator"; The compatible string "arm,coresight-replicator" is not an explicit naming to express the replicator is 'static'. To unify the naming convention, this patch introduces a new compatible string "arm,coresight-static-replicator" for the static replicator; the compatible string "arm,coresight-replicator" is kept for backward compatibility, but tag it as obsolete and suggest to use the new compatible string. As result CoreSight replicator have below bindings: Dynamic replicator: "arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator", "arm,primecell"; Static replicator: "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; "arm,coresight-replicator"; (obsolete) Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)