xen-block: support feature-large-sector-size
diff mbox series

Message ID 20190409164038.25484-1-paul.durrant@citrix.com
State New
Headers show
Series
  • xen-block: support feature-large-sector-size
Related show

Commit Message

Paul Durrant April 9, 2019, 4:40 p.m. UTC
A recent Xen commit [1] clarified the semantics of sector based quantities
used in the blkif protocol such that it is now safe to create a xen-block
device with a logical_block_size != 512, as long as the device only
connects to a frontend advertizing 'feature-large-block-size'.

This patch modifies xen-block accordingly. It also uses a stack variable
for the BlockBackend in xen_block_realize() to avoid repeated dereferencing
of the BlockConf pointer, and changes the parameters of
xen_block_dataplane_create() so that the BlockBackend pointer and sector
size are passed expicitly rather than implicitly via the BlockConf.

These modifications have been tested against a recent Windows PV XENVBD
driver [2] using a xen-disk device with a 4kB logical block size.

[1] http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=67e1c050e36b2c9900cca83618e56189effbad98
[2] https://winpvdrvbuild.xenproject.org:8080/job/XENVBD-master/126

Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
---
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Cc: Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
---
 hw/block/dataplane/xen-block.c | 25 ++++++++++++----------
 hw/block/dataplane/xen-block.h |  3 ++-
 hw/block/xen-block.c           | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

Comments

Anthony PERARD April 10, 2019, 3:52 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 05:40:38PM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote:
> A recent Xen commit [1] clarified the semantics of sector based quantities
> used in the blkif protocol such that it is now safe to create a xen-block
> device with a logical_block_size != 512, as long as the device only
> connects to a frontend advertizing 'feature-large-block-size'.
> 
> This patch modifies xen-block accordingly. It also uses a stack variable
> for the BlockBackend in xen_block_realize() to avoid repeated dereferencing
> of the BlockConf pointer, and changes the parameters of
> xen_block_dataplane_create() so that the BlockBackend pointer and sector
> size are passed expicitly rather than implicitly via the BlockConf.
> 
> These modifications have been tested against a recent Windows PV XENVBD
> driver [2] using a xen-disk device with a 4kB logical block size.
> 
> [1] http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=67e1c050e36b2c9900cca83618e56189effbad98
> [2] https://winpvdrvbuild.xenproject.org:8080/job/XENVBD-master/126
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/hw/block/xen-block.c b/hw/block/xen-block.c
> index ef635be4c2..05e890ad78 100644
> --- a/hw/block/xen-block.c
> +++ b/hw/block/xen-block.c
> @@ -51,11 +51,25 @@ static void xen_block_connect(XenDevice *xendev, Error **errp)
[...]
> +    if (xen_device_frontend_scanf(xendev, "feature-large-sector-size", "%u",
> +                                  &feature_large_sector_size) != 1) {
> +        feature_large_sector_size = 0;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (feature_large_sector_size != 1 &&
> +        conf->logical_block_size != XEN_BLKIF_SECTOR_SIZE) {
> +        error_setg(errp, "logical_block_size != %u not supported",

Maybe add "by frontend" to the error message?

> +                   XEN_BLKIF_SECTOR_SIZE);
> +        return;
> +    }
> +

With the question answered:
Reviewed-by: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>

Thanks,
Paul Durrant April 10, 2019, 3:55 p.m. UTC | #2
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anthony PERARD [mailto:anthony.perard@citrix.com]
> Sent: 10 April 2019 16:52
> To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; qemu-block@nongnu.org; Stefano Stabellini
> <sstabellini@kernel.org>; Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>; Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>; Max
> Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-block: support feature-large-sector-size
> 
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 05:40:38PM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > A recent Xen commit [1] clarified the semantics of sector based quantities
> > used in the blkif protocol such that it is now safe to create a xen-block
> > device with a logical_block_size != 512, as long as the device only
> > connects to a frontend advertizing 'feature-large-block-size'.
> >
> > This patch modifies xen-block accordingly. It also uses a stack variable
> > for the BlockBackend in xen_block_realize() to avoid repeated dereferencing
> > of the BlockConf pointer, and changes the parameters of
> > xen_block_dataplane_create() so that the BlockBackend pointer and sector
> > size are passed expicitly rather than implicitly via the BlockConf.
> >
> > These modifications have been tested against a recent Windows PV XENVBD
> > driver [2] using a xen-disk device with a 4kB logical block size.
> >
> > [1] http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=67e1c050e36b2c9900cca83618e56189effbad98
> > [2] https://winpvdrvbuild.xenproject.org:8080/job/XENVBD-master/126
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
> > ---
> > diff --git a/hw/block/xen-block.c b/hw/block/xen-block.c
> > index ef635be4c2..05e890ad78 100644
> > --- a/hw/block/xen-block.c
> > +++ b/hw/block/xen-block.c
> > @@ -51,11 +51,25 @@ static void xen_block_connect(XenDevice *xendev, Error **errp)
> [...]
> > +    if (xen_device_frontend_scanf(xendev, "feature-large-sector-size", "%u",
> > +                                  &feature_large_sector_size) != 1) {
> > +        feature_large_sector_size = 0;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    if (feature_large_sector_size != 1 &&
> > +        conf->logical_block_size != XEN_BLKIF_SECTOR_SIZE) {
> > +        error_setg(errp, "logical_block_size != %u not supported",
> 
> Maybe add "by frontend" to the error message?

Yes, I'm fine with that addition.

> 
> > +                   XEN_BLKIF_SECTOR_SIZE);
> > +        return;
> > +    }
> > +
> 
> With the question answered:
> Reviewed-by: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
> 

Thanks,

  Paul

> Thanks,
> 
> --
> Anthony PERARD
Max Reitz June 26, 2019, 4:48 p.m. UTC | #3
On 09.04.19 18:40, Paul Durrant wrote:
> A recent Xen commit [1] clarified the semantics of sector based quantities
> used in the blkif protocol such that it is now safe to create a xen-block
> device with a logical_block_size != 512, as long as the device only
> connects to a frontend advertizing 'feature-large-block-size'.
> 
> This patch modifies xen-block accordingly. It also uses a stack variable
> for the BlockBackend in xen_block_realize() to avoid repeated dereferencing
> of the BlockConf pointer, and changes the parameters of
> xen_block_dataplane_create() so that the BlockBackend pointer and sector
> size are passed expicitly rather than implicitly via the BlockConf.
> 
> These modifications have been tested against a recent Windows PV XENVBD
> driver [2] using a xen-disk device with a 4kB logical block size.
> 
> [1] http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=67e1c050e36b2c9900cca83618e56189effbad98
> [2] https://winpvdrvbuild.xenproject.org:8080/job/XENVBD-master/126
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
> ---
> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
> Cc: Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
> Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> Cc: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/block/dataplane/xen-block.c | 25 ++++++++++++----------
>  hw/block/dataplane/xen-block.h |  3 ++-
>  hw/block/xen-block.c           | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

Thanks, added “by frontend” to the error message and applied to my block
branch:

https://git.xanclic.moe/XanClic/qemu/commits/branch/block

Max
Anthony PERARD June 26, 2019, 5:19 p.m. UTC | #4
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 06:48:50PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 09.04.19 18:40, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > A recent Xen commit [1] clarified the semantics of sector based quantities
> > used in the blkif protocol such that it is now safe to create a xen-block
> > device with a logical_block_size != 512, as long as the device only
> > connects to a frontend advertizing 'feature-large-block-size'.
> > 
> > This patch modifies xen-block accordingly. It also uses a stack variable
> > for the BlockBackend in xen_block_realize() to avoid repeated dereferencing
> > of the BlockConf pointer, and changes the parameters of
> > xen_block_dataplane_create() so that the BlockBackend pointer and sector
> > size are passed expicitly rather than implicitly via the BlockConf.
> > 
> > These modifications have been tested against a recent Windows PV XENVBD
> > driver [2] using a xen-disk device with a 4kB logical block size.
> > 
> > [1] http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=67e1c050e36b2c9900cca83618e56189effbad98
> > [2] https://winpvdrvbuild.xenproject.org:8080/job/XENVBD-master/126
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
> > ---
> > Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
> > Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  hw/block/dataplane/xen-block.c | 25 ++++++++++++----------
> >  hw/block/dataplane/xen-block.h |  3 ++-
> >  hw/block/xen-block.c           | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >  3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> Thanks, added “by frontend” to the error message and applied to my block
> branch:
> 
> https://git.xanclic.moe/XanClic/qemu/commits/branch/block

:(, I've just sent a pull request with that patch:
https://patchew.org/QEMU/20190624153257.20163-1-anthony.perard@citrix.com/20190624153257.20163-2-anthony.perard@citrix.com/

I guess I need to start sending an email every time I've added a patch
to my queue.

Cheers,
Max Reitz June 26, 2019, 5:48 p.m. UTC | #5
On 26.06.19 19:19, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 06:48:50PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 09.04.19 18:40, Paul Durrant wrote:
>>> A recent Xen commit [1] clarified the semantics of sector based quantities
>>> used in the blkif protocol such that it is now safe to create a xen-block
>>> device with a logical_block_size != 512, as long as the device only
>>> connects to a frontend advertizing 'feature-large-block-size'.
>>>
>>> This patch modifies xen-block accordingly. It also uses a stack variable
>>> for the BlockBackend in xen_block_realize() to avoid repeated dereferencing
>>> of the BlockConf pointer, and changes the parameters of
>>> xen_block_dataplane_create() so that the BlockBackend pointer and sector
>>> size are passed expicitly rather than implicitly via the BlockConf.
>>>
>>> These modifications have been tested against a recent Windows PV XENVBD
>>> driver [2] using a xen-disk device with a 4kB logical block size.
>>>
>>> [1] http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=67e1c050e36b2c9900cca83618e56189effbad98
>>> [2] https://winpvdrvbuild.xenproject.org:8080/job/XENVBD-master/126
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
>>> ---
>>> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
>>> Cc: Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
>>> Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>  hw/block/dataplane/xen-block.c | 25 ++++++++++++----------
>>>  hw/block/dataplane/xen-block.h |  3 ++-
>>>  hw/block/xen-block.c           | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>>  3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>
>> Thanks, added “by frontend” to the error message and applied to my block
>> branch:
>>
>> https://git.xanclic.moe/XanClic/qemu/commits/branch/block
> 
> :(, I've just sent a pull request with that patch:
> https://patchew.org/QEMU/20190624153257.20163-1-anthony.perard@citrix.com/20190624153257.20163-2-anthony.perard@citrix.com/

That’s just as well, then. :-)

> I guess I need to start sending an email every time I've added a patch
> to my queue.

Well, it certainly won’t hurt.  Although in this cases it’s just a bit
of an unfortunate coincidence that I looked at this patch now when Peter
seems to be away (otherwise I’d have seen it in master).

Max

Patch
diff mbox series

diff --git a/hw/block/dataplane/xen-block.c b/hw/block/dataplane/xen-block.c
index 908bd27bbd..50094a886b 100644
--- a/hw/block/dataplane/xen-block.c
+++ b/hw/block/dataplane/xen-block.c
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@  struct XenBlockDataPlane {
     int requests_inflight;
     unsigned int max_requests;
     BlockBackend *blk;
+    unsigned int sector_size;
     QEMUBH *bh;
     IOThread *iothread;
     AioContext *ctx;
@@ -167,7 +168,7 @@  static int xen_block_parse_request(XenBlockRequest *request)
         goto err;
     }
 
-    request->start = request->req.sector_number * XEN_BLKIF_SECTOR_SIZE;
+    request->start = request->req.sector_number * dataplane->sector_size;
     for (i = 0; i < request->req.nr_segments; i++) {
         if (i == BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_REQUEST) {
             error_report("error: nr_segments too big");
@@ -177,14 +178,14 @@  static int xen_block_parse_request(XenBlockRequest *request)
             error_report("error: first > last sector");
             goto err;
         }
-        if (request->req.seg[i].last_sect * XEN_BLKIF_SECTOR_SIZE >=
+        if (request->req.seg[i].last_sect * dataplane->sector_size >=
             XC_PAGE_SIZE) {
             error_report("error: page crossing");
             goto err;
         }
 
         len = (request->req.seg[i].last_sect -
-               request->req.seg[i].first_sect + 1) * XEN_BLKIF_SECTOR_SIZE;
+               request->req.seg[i].first_sect + 1) * dataplane->sector_size;
         request->size += len;
     }
     if (request->start + request->size > blk_getlength(dataplane->blk)) {
@@ -218,17 +219,17 @@  static int xen_block_copy_request(XenBlockRequest *request)
         if (to_domain) {
             segs[i].dest.foreign.ref = request->req.seg[i].gref;
             segs[i].dest.foreign.offset = request->req.seg[i].first_sect *
-                XEN_BLKIF_SECTOR_SIZE;
+                dataplane->sector_size;
             segs[i].source.virt = virt;
         } else {
             segs[i].source.foreign.ref = request->req.seg[i].gref;
             segs[i].source.foreign.offset = request->req.seg[i].first_sect *
-                XEN_BLKIF_SECTOR_SIZE;
+                dataplane->sector_size;
             segs[i].dest.virt = virt;
         }
         segs[i].len = (request->req.seg[i].last_sect -
                        request->req.seg[i].first_sect + 1) *
-                      XEN_BLKIF_SECTOR_SIZE;
+                      dataplane->sector_size;
         virt += segs[i].len;
     }
 
@@ -338,12 +339,12 @@  static bool xen_block_split_discard(XenBlockRequest *request,
 
     /* Wrap around, or overflowing byte limit? */
     if (sec_start + sec_count < sec_count ||
-        sec_start + sec_count > INT64_MAX / XEN_BLKIF_SECTOR_SIZE) {
+        sec_start + sec_count > INT64_MAX / dataplane->sector_size) {
         return false;
     }
 
-    byte_offset = sec_start * XEN_BLKIF_SECTOR_SIZE;
-    byte_remaining = sec_count * XEN_BLKIF_SECTOR_SIZE;
+    byte_offset = sec_start * dataplane->sector_size;
+    byte_remaining = sec_count * dataplane->sector_size;
 
     do {
         byte_chunk = byte_remaining > BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_BYTES ?
@@ -626,13 +627,15 @@  static bool xen_block_dataplane_event(void *opaque)
 }
 
 XenBlockDataPlane *xen_block_dataplane_create(XenDevice *xendev,
-                                              BlockConf *conf,
+                                              BlockBackend *blk,
+                                              unsigned int sector_size,
                                               IOThread *iothread)
 {
     XenBlockDataPlane *dataplane = g_new0(XenBlockDataPlane, 1);
 
     dataplane->xendev = xendev;
-    dataplane->blk = conf->blk;
+    dataplane->blk = blk;
+    dataplane->sector_size = sector_size;
 
     QLIST_INIT(&dataplane->inflight);
     QLIST_INIT(&dataplane->freelist);
diff --git a/hw/block/dataplane/xen-block.h b/hw/block/dataplane/xen-block.h
index d6fa6d26dd..76dcd51c3d 100644
--- a/hw/block/dataplane/xen-block.h
+++ b/hw/block/dataplane/xen-block.h
@@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ 
 typedef struct XenBlockDataPlane XenBlockDataPlane;
 
 XenBlockDataPlane *xen_block_dataplane_create(XenDevice *xendev,
-                                              BlockConf *conf,
+                                              BlockBackend *blk,
+                                              unsigned int sector_size,
                                               IOThread *iothread);
 void xen_block_dataplane_destroy(XenBlockDataPlane *dataplane);
 void xen_block_dataplane_start(XenBlockDataPlane *dataplane,
diff --git a/hw/block/xen-block.c b/hw/block/xen-block.c
index ef635be4c2..05e890ad78 100644
--- a/hw/block/xen-block.c
+++ b/hw/block/xen-block.c
@@ -51,11 +51,25 @@  static void xen_block_connect(XenDevice *xendev, Error **errp)
     XenBlockDevice *blockdev = XEN_BLOCK_DEVICE(xendev);
     const char *type = object_get_typename(OBJECT(blockdev));
     XenBlockVdev *vdev = &blockdev->props.vdev;
+    BlockConf *conf = &blockdev->props.conf;
+    unsigned int feature_large_sector_size;
     unsigned int order, nr_ring_ref, *ring_ref, event_channel, protocol;
     char *str;
 
     trace_xen_block_connect(type, vdev->disk, vdev->partition);
 
+    if (xen_device_frontend_scanf(xendev, "feature-large-sector-size", "%u",
+                                  &feature_large_sector_size) != 1) {
+        feature_large_sector_size = 0;
+    }
+
+    if (feature_large_sector_size != 1 &&
+        conf->logical_block_size != XEN_BLKIF_SECTOR_SIZE) {
+        error_setg(errp, "logical_block_size != %u not supported",
+                   XEN_BLKIF_SECTOR_SIZE);
+        return;
+    }
+
     if (xen_device_frontend_scanf(xendev, "ring-page-order", "%u",
                                   &order) != 1) {
         nr_ring_ref = 1;
@@ -149,7 +163,7 @@  static void xen_block_set_size(XenBlockDevice *blockdev)
     const char *type = object_get_typename(OBJECT(blockdev));
     XenBlockVdev *vdev = &blockdev->props.vdev;
     BlockConf *conf = &blockdev->props.conf;
-    int64_t sectors = blk_getlength(conf->blk) / XEN_BLKIF_SECTOR_SIZE;
+    int64_t sectors = blk_getlength(conf->blk) / conf->logical_block_size;
     XenDevice *xendev = XEN_DEVICE(blockdev);
 
     trace_xen_block_size(type, vdev->disk, vdev->partition, sectors);
@@ -184,6 +198,7 @@  static void xen_block_realize(XenDevice *xendev, Error **errp)
     const char *type = object_get_typename(OBJECT(blockdev));
     XenBlockVdev *vdev = &blockdev->props.vdev;
     BlockConf *conf = &blockdev->props.conf;
+    BlockBackend *blk = conf->blk;
     Error *local_err = NULL;
 
     if (vdev->type == XEN_BLOCK_VDEV_TYPE_INVALID) {
@@ -205,8 +220,8 @@  static void xen_block_realize(XenDevice *xendev, Error **errp)
      * The blkif protocol does not deal with removable media, so it must
      * always be present, even for CDRom devices.
      */
-    assert(conf->blk);
-    if (!blk_is_inserted(conf->blk)) {
+    assert(blk);
+    if (!blk_is_inserted(blk)) {
         error_setg(errp, "device needs media, but drive is empty");
         return;
     }
@@ -223,26 +238,20 @@  static void xen_block_realize(XenDevice *xendev, Error **errp)
 
     blkconf_blocksizes(conf);
 
-    if (conf->logical_block_size != XEN_BLKIF_SECTOR_SIZE) {
-        error_setg(errp, "logical_block_size != %u not supported",
-                   XEN_BLKIF_SECTOR_SIZE);
-        return;
-    }
-
     if (conf->logical_block_size > conf->physical_block_size) {
         error_setg(
             errp, "logical_block_size > physical_block_size not supported");
         return;
     }
 
-    blk_set_dev_ops(conf->blk, &xen_block_dev_ops, blockdev);
-    blk_set_guest_block_size(conf->blk, conf->logical_block_size);
+    blk_set_dev_ops(blk, &xen_block_dev_ops, blockdev);
+    blk_set_guest_block_size(blk, conf->logical_block_size);
 
     if (conf->discard_granularity == -1) {
         conf->discard_granularity = conf->physical_block_size;
     }
 
-    if (blk_get_flags(conf->blk) & BDRV_O_UNMAP) {
+    if (blk_get_flags(blk) & BDRV_O_UNMAP) {
         xen_device_backend_printf(xendev, "feature-discard", "%u", 1);
         xen_device_backend_printf(xendev, "discard-granularity", "%u",
                                   conf->discard_granularity);
@@ -259,12 +268,13 @@  static void xen_block_realize(XenDevice *xendev, Error **errp)
                                blockdev->device_type);
 
     xen_device_backend_printf(xendev, "sector-size", "%u",
-                              XEN_BLKIF_SECTOR_SIZE);
+                              conf->logical_block_size);
 
     xen_block_set_size(blockdev);
 
     blockdev->dataplane =
-        xen_block_dataplane_create(xendev, conf, blockdev->props.iothread);
+        xen_block_dataplane_create(xendev, blk, conf->logical_block_size,
+                                   blockdev->props.iothread);
 }
 
 static void xen_block_frontend_changed(XenDevice *xendev,