diff mbox

[U-Boot] da850: fix the channel number for EMAC teardown init

Message ID 1311870338-18950-7-git-send-email-nagabhushana.netagunte@ti.com
State Changes Requested
Headers show

Commit Message

nagabhushana.netagunte@ti.com July 28, 2011, 4:25 p.m. UTC 
From: Nagabhushana Netagunte <nagabhushana.netagunte@ti.com>

TX and RX channel numbers programmed as '1' during EMAC teardown initialization
is wrong. This patch fixes the same by setting channel number to '0' which is
used by U-boot.

Signed-off-by: Sugumar Natarajan <sugumar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nagabhushana Netagunte <nagabhushana.netagunte@ti.com>
---
 drivers/net/davinci_emac.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Wolfgang Denk July 28, 2011, 6:42 p.m. UTC | #1 
Dear nagabhushana.netagunte@ti.com,

In message <1311870338-18950-7-git-send-email-nagabhushana.netagunte@ti.com> you wrote:
> From: Nagabhushana Netagunte <nagabhushana.netagunte@ti.com>
> 
> TX and RX channel numbers programmed as '1' during EMAC teardown initialization
> is wrong. This patch fixes the same by setting channel number to '0' which is
> used by U-boot.

Is this set of patches in any specific order?  It appaers so, as it
seems I cannot apply them in random order.

But then, you don't provide any numbering in the Subject: or elsewhere,
so how should we know?


NAK for the whole set of patches.  Please resubmit with proper
numbering.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk
nagabhushana.netagunte@ti.com July 29, 2011, 8:03 a.m. UTC | #2 
Thanks Denk for the comments.

Even though all the patches are separate w.r.t features, they have inter-dependency w.r.t applying. To make it easy for applying, I will send it as
Single series with a cover letter as they are all related to da850. I hope
That is OK with you.

Thanks,
Nagabhushana

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 00:12:12, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear nagabhushana.netagunte@ti.com,
> 
> In message <1311870338-18950-7-git-send-email-nagabhushana.netagunte@ti.com> you wrote:
> > From: Nagabhushana Netagunte <nagabhushana.netagunte@ti.com>
> > 
> > TX and RX channel numbers programmed as '1' during EMAC teardown 
> > initialization is wrong. This patch fixes the same by setting channel 
> > number to '0' which is used by U-boot.
> 
> Is this set of patches in any specific order?  It appaers so, as it seems I cannot apply them in random order.
> 
> But then, you don't provide any numbering in the Subject: or elsewhere, so how should we know?
> 
> 
> NAK for the whole set of patches.  Please resubmit with proper numbering.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Wolfgang Denk
> 
> -- 
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
> Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de As in certain cults it is possible to kill a process if you know  its
> true name.                      -- Ken Thompson and Dennis M. Ritchie
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/davinci_emac.c b/drivers/net/davinci_emac.c
index 66c0d13..c0b8929 100644
--- a/drivers/net/davinci_emac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/davinci_emac.c
@@ -457,7 +457,7 @@  static void davinci_eth_ch_teardown(int ch)
 
 	if (ch == EMAC_CH_TX) {
 		/* Init TX channel teardown */
-		writel(1, &adap_emac->TXTEARDOWN);
+		writel(0, &adap_emac->TXTEARDOWN);
 		do {
 			/*
 			 * Wait here for Tx teardown completion interrupt to
@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@  static void davinci_eth_ch_teardown(int ch)
 		writel(0, &adap_emac->TX0HDP);
 	} else {
 		/* Init RX channel teardown */
-		writel(1, &adap_emac->RXTEARDOWN);
+		writel(0, &adap_emac->RXTEARDOWN);
 		do {
 			/*
 			 * Wait here for Rx teardown completion interrupt to