Message ID | 20190319152531.10380-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Headers | show |
Series | [-next] rtc: opal: Make opal_tpo_alarm_irq_enable static | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
snowpatch_ozlabs/apply_patch | success | Successfully applied on branch next (de3c83c2fd2b87cf68214eda76dfa66989d78cb6) |
snowpatch_ozlabs/build-ppc64le | success | Build succeeded and removed 1 sparse warnings |
snowpatch_ozlabs/build-ppc64be | success | Build succeeded and removed 1 sparse warnings |
snowpatch_ozlabs/build-ppc64e | success | Build succeeded |
snowpatch_ozlabs/build-pmac32 | success | Build succeeded |
snowpatch_ozlabs/checkpatch | warning | total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 8 lines checked |
On 19/03/2019 23:25:31+0800, Yue Haibing wrote: > From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> > > Fix sparse warning: > > drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c:227:5: > warning: symbol 'opal_tpo_alarm_irq_enable' was not declared. Should it be static? > > Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> > --- > drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > Applied, thanks.
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c index 60f2250..3dd9d26 100644 --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static int opal_set_tpo_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alarm) return rc; } -int opal_tpo_alarm_irq_enable(struct device *dev, unsigned int enabled) +static int opal_tpo_alarm_irq_enable(struct device *dev, unsigned int enabled) { struct rtc_wkalrm alarm = { .enabled = 0 };