[GIT,PULL,2/2] Rockchip arm64 devicetree fixes for 5.0

Message ID 23121360.LiWTZRSn6P@phil
State New
Headers show
Series
  • [GIT,PULL,1/2] Rockchip arm32 devicetree fixes for 5.0
Related show

Pull-request

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip.git tags/v5.0-rockchip-dts64fixes-1

Message

Heiko Stübner Feb. 1, 2019, 11:14 a.m.
The following changes since commit bfeffd155283772bbe78c6a05dec7c0128ee500c:

  Linux 5.0-rc1 (2019-01-06 17:08:20 -0800)

are available in the Git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip.git tags/v5.0-rockchip-dts64fixes-1

for you to fetch changes up to 26e2d7b03ea7ff254bf78305aa44dda62e70b78e:

  arm64: dts: rockchip: enable usb-host regulators at boot on rk3328-rock64 (2019-01-27 23:14:04 +0100)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Fix for new dtc graph warnings and a regulator fix for rock64.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Dmitry Voytik (1):
      arm64: dts: rockchip: enable usb-host regulators at boot on rk3328-rock64

Enric Balletbo i Serra (1):
      arm64: dts: rockchip: fix graph_port warning on rk3399 bob kevin and excavator

 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328-rock64.dts             | 2 ++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru-bob.dts            | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru-kevin.dts          | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-sapphire-excavator.dts | 2 +-
 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Arnd Bergmann Feb. 15, 2019, 12:42 p.m. | #1
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 12:14 PM Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Fix for new dtc graph warnings and a regulator fix for rock64.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Dmitry Voytik (1):
>       arm64: dts: rockchip: enable usb-host regulators at boot on rk3328-rock64
>

Pulled into arm/fixes, thanks!

Note: since we always have only a single fixes branch, sending the
32-bit and 64-bit fixes together would be slightly easier.

      Arnd
Heiko Stübner Feb. 15, 2019, 6:37 p.m. | #2
Am Freitag, 15. Februar 2019, 13:42:48 CET schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 12:14 PM Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Fix for new dtc graph warnings and a regulator fix for rock64.
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > Dmitry Voytik (1):
> >       arm64: dts: rockchip: enable usb-host regulators at boot on
> >       rk3328-rock64
> 
> Pulled into arm/fixes, thanks!
> 
> Note: since we always have only a single fixes branch, sending the
> 32-bit and 64-bit fixes together would be slightly easier.

No problem, I'll keep 32+64bit fixes together in the future.
I guess regular changes for the merge-window should continue
being separated, right?


Heiko
Arnd Bergmann Feb. 15, 2019, 7:19 p.m. | #3
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 7:38 PM Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
>
> Am Freitag, 15. Februar 2019, 13:42:48 CET schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> > On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 12:14 PM Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Fix for new dtc graph warnings and a regulator fix for rock64.
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Dmitry Voytik (1):
> > >       arm64: dts: rockchip: enable usb-host regulators at boot on
> > >       rk3328-rock64
> >
> > Pulled into arm/fixes, thanks!
> >
> > Note: since we always have only a single fixes branch, sending the
> > 32-bit and 64-bit fixes together would be slightly easier.
>
> No problem, I'll keep 32+64bit fixes together in the future.
> I guess regular changes for the merge-window should continue
> being separated, right?

Yes, unless they are logically connected. You can also have
more than two DT pull requests if that makes a better split.
Some SoCs have separate dt-bindings pull requests (shared
with drivers), or split out stuff by SoC subfamily if it gets too
big (probably not necessary for rockchips, which seem more
uniform).

       Arnd
Heiko Stübner Feb. 15, 2019, 7:29 p.m. | #4
Am Freitag, 15. Februar 2019, 20:19:50 CET schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 7:38 PM Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 15. Februar 2019, 13:42:48 CET schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> > > On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 12:14 PM Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Fix for new dtc graph warnings and a regulator fix for rock64.
> > > > 
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > 
> > > > Dmitry Voytik (1):
> > > >       arm64: dts: rockchip: enable usb-host regulators at boot on
> > > >       rk3328-rock64
> > > 
> > > Pulled into arm/fixes, thanks!
> > > 
> > > Note: since we always have only a single fixes branch, sending the
> > > 32-bit and 64-bit fixes together would be slightly easier.
> > 
> > No problem, I'll keep 32+64bit fixes together in the future.
> > I guess regular changes for the merge-window should continue
> > being separated, right?
> 
> Yes, unless they are logically connected. You can also have
> more than two DT pull requests if that makes a better split.
> Some SoCs have separate dt-bindings pull requests (shared
> with drivers), or split out stuff by SoC subfamily if it gets too
> big (probably not necessary for rockchips, which seem more
> uniform).

yeah, I think the split I had so far (dts32+dts64+drivers if necessary)
worked quite well so far, so I'll keep it :-)