From patchwork Wed Jul  6 11:51:26 2011
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Patchwork-Submitter: Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
X-Patchwork-Id: 103456
Return-Path: 
 <gcc-patches-return-296060-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org>
X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org
Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org
Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131])
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 147F9B6F69
	for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>;
	Wed,  6 Jul 2011 21:51:49 +1000 (EST)
Received: (qmail 31126 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2011 11:51:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 31115 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jul 2011 11:51:44 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL, BAYES_00,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from snape.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (HELO
	smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE) (129.70.160.84) by
	sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP;
	Wed, 06 Jul 2011 11:51:29 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1])	by
	smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id
	DDB4A798; Wed,  6 Jul 2011 13:51:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE ([127.0.0.1])	by
	localhost (malfoy.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1])
	(amavisd-new, port 10024)	with LMTP id FmsSgAZVPnQC;
	Wed,  6 Jul 2011 13:51:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
	(manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.161.120])	(using
	TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))	(No
	client certificate requested)	by
	smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTPS id
	9A92F797; Wed,  6 Jul 2011 13:51:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from ro@localhost)	by manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
	(8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4/Submit) id p66BpQ2G002908;
	Wed, 6 Jul 2011 13:51:26 +0200 (MEST)
From: Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
Subject: [testsuite] Don't XFAIL gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030807-7.c (PR
	tree-optimization/49647)
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 13:51:26 +0200
Message-ID: <yddpqlnk4ox.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (usg-unix-v)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: 
 <mailto:gcc-patches-unsubscribe-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org

As described in the PR, gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030807-7.c seems to XPASS
everywhere.  This patch removes the xfail.

Tested with the appropriate runtest invocation on i386-pc-solaris2.10.

Ok for mainline?

	Rainer


2011-07-06  Rainer Orth  <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>

	PR tree-optimization/49647
	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030807-7.c: Remove xfail *-*-*.

Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030807-7.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030807-7.c	(revision 175909)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030807-7.c	(working copy)
@@ -33,5 +33,5 @@
 }
 
 /* There should be exactly one IF conditional.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "if " 1 "vrp1" { xfail *-*-* } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "if " 1 "vrp1" } } */
 /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "vrp1" } } */