================================
WARNING: inconsistent lock state
4.20.0-rc6
--------------------------------
inconsistent {HARDIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-HARDIRQ-W}
python/12572 [HC1[1]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] takes:
00000000052a4df4 (&(&table->lock)->rlock#2){?.+.}, /0x50 [mlx5_core]
{HARDIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
_raw_spin_lock+0x33/0x70
mlx5_get_rsc+0x1a/0x50 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_ib_eqe_pf_action+0x493/0x1be0 [mlx5_ib]
process_one_work+0x90c/0x1820
worker_thread+0x87/0xbb0
kthread+0x320/0x3e0
ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
irq event stamp: 103928
hardirqs last enabled at (103927): [] nk+0x1a/0x1c
hardirqs last disabled at (103928): [] unk+0x1a/0x1c
softirqs last enabled at (103924): [] tcp_sendmsg+0x31/0x40
softirqs last disabled at (103922): [] 80
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&(&table->lock)->rlock#2);
lock(&(&table->lock)->rlock#2);
*** DEADLOCK ***
Fixes: 032080ab43ac ("IB/mlx5: Lock QP during page fault handling")
Signed-off-by: Moni Shoua <monis@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/qp.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
@@ -44,14 +44,15 @@ static struct mlx5_core_rsc_common *
mlx5_get_rsc(struct mlx5_qp_table *table, u32 rsn)
{
struct mlx5_core_rsc_common *common;
+ unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock(&table->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&table->lock, flags);
common = radix_tree_lookup(&table->tree, rsn);
if (common)
atomic_inc(&common->refcount);
- spin_unlock(&table->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&table->lock, flags);
return common;
}
From: Moni Shoua <monis@mellanox.com> The lock in qp_table might be taken from process context or from interrupt context. This may lead to a deadlock unless it is taken with IRQs disabled. Discovered by lockdep