From patchwork Thu Jan 10 13:53:33 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Andrew Murray X-Patchwork-Id: 1022943 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43b7Mg3rmPz9sN4 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 01:16:15 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43b7Mg2lQlzDqkj for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 01:16:15 +1100 (AEDT) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=arm.com (client-ip=217.140.101.70; helo=foss.arm.com; envelope-from=andrew.murray@arm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.101.70]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43b6tk5vSGzDqXg for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:54:38 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECD21684; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 05:54:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from e119886-lin.cambridge.arm.com (unknown [10.37.6.11]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E97D3F5AF; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 05:54:33 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Murray To: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Richard Henderson , Ivan Kokshaysky , Matt Turner , Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov , Russell King , suzuki.poulose@arm.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, Michael Ellerman Subject: [PATCH v5 11/12] x86: perf/core: strengthen exclude checks with PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 13:53:33 +0000 Message-Id: <1547128414-50693-12-git-send-email-andrew.murray@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1547128414-50693-1-git-send-email-andrew.murray@arm.com> References: <1547128414-50693-1-git-send-email-andrew.murray@arm.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: x86@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" For x86 PMUs that do not support context exclusion let's advertise the PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE capability. This ensures that perf will prevent us from handling events where any exclusion flags are set. Let's also remove the now unnecessary check for exclusion flags. This change means that amd/iommu and amd/uncore will now also indicate that they do not support exclude_{hv|idle} and intel/uncore that it does not support exclude_{guest|host}. Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray --- arch/x86/events/amd/iommu.c | 6 +----- arch/x86/events/amd/uncore.c | 7 ++----- arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c | 9 +-------- 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/events/amd/iommu.c b/arch/x86/events/amd/iommu.c index 3210fee..7635c23 100644 --- a/arch/x86/events/amd/iommu.c +++ b/arch/x86/events/amd/iommu.c @@ -223,11 +223,6 @@ static int perf_iommu_event_init(struct perf_event *event) if (is_sampling_event(event) || event->attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_TASK) return -EINVAL; - /* IOMMU counters do not have usr/os/guest/host bits */ - if (event->attr.exclude_user || event->attr.exclude_kernel || - event->attr.exclude_host || event->attr.exclude_guest) - return -EINVAL; - if (event->cpu < 0) return -EINVAL; @@ -414,6 +409,7 @@ static const struct pmu iommu_pmu __initconst = { .read = perf_iommu_read, .task_ctx_nr = perf_invalid_context, .attr_groups = amd_iommu_attr_groups, + .capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE, }; static __init int init_one_iommu(unsigned int idx) diff --git a/arch/x86/events/amd/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/amd/uncore.c index 398df6e..79cfd3b 100644 --- a/arch/x86/events/amd/uncore.c +++ b/arch/x86/events/amd/uncore.c @@ -201,11 +201,6 @@ static int amd_uncore_event_init(struct perf_event *event) if (is_sampling_event(event) || event->attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_TASK) return -EINVAL; - /* NB and Last level cache counters do not have usr/os/guest/host bits */ - if (event->attr.exclude_user || event->attr.exclude_kernel || - event->attr.exclude_host || event->attr.exclude_guest) - return -EINVAL; - /* and we do not enable counter overflow interrupts */ hwc->config = event->attr.config & AMD64_RAW_EVENT_MASK_NB; hwc->idx = -1; @@ -307,6 +302,7 @@ static struct pmu amd_nb_pmu = { .start = amd_uncore_start, .stop = amd_uncore_stop, .read = amd_uncore_read, + .capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE, }; static struct pmu amd_llc_pmu = { @@ -317,6 +313,7 @@ static struct pmu amd_llc_pmu = { .start = amd_uncore_start, .stop = amd_uncore_stop, .read = amd_uncore_read, + .capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE, }; static struct amd_uncore *amd_uncore_alloc(unsigned int cpu) diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c index 27a4614..d516161 100644 --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c @@ -695,14 +695,6 @@ static int uncore_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event) if (pmu->func_id < 0) return -ENOENT; - /* - * Uncore PMU does measure at all privilege level all the time. - * So it doesn't make sense to specify any exclude bits. - */ - if (event->attr.exclude_user || event->attr.exclude_kernel || - event->attr.exclude_hv || event->attr.exclude_idle) - return -EINVAL; - /* Sampling not supported yet */ if (hwc->sample_period) return -EINVAL; @@ -800,6 +792,7 @@ static int uncore_pmu_register(struct intel_uncore_pmu *pmu) .stop = uncore_pmu_event_stop, .read = uncore_pmu_event_read, .module = THIS_MODULE, + .capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE, }; } else { pmu->pmu = *pmu->type->pmu;