[v5,1/2] i2c: imx: notify about real errors on dma i2c_imx_dma_request

Message ID 20190109055650.32259-2-o.rempel@pengutronix.de
State Accepted
Headers show
Series
  • i2c: imx: rework imx error handling.
Related show

Commit Message

Oleksij Rempel Jan. 9, 2019, 5:56 a.m.
At least on i.MX5x, the DMA events for I2C and SDHC use the same channel
and there can only be a single user. So in this case there should be no
message emitted that looks like an error if the I2C device doesn't have
an assigned DMA channel. In contrast real problems that were only
emitted at debug level before should be described at a higher level
to be better visible and so understandable.

Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Comments

Wolfram Sang Jan. 15, 2019, 9:54 p.m. | #1
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 06:56:49AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> At least on i.MX5x, the DMA events for I2C and SDHC use the same channel
> and there can only be a single user. So in this case there should be no
> message emitted that looks like an error if the I2C device doesn't have
> an assigned DMA channel. In contrast real problems that were only
> emitted at debug level before should be described at a higher level
> to be better visible and so understandable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

Applied to for-next, thanks!

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
index fa9ad53845d9..e28ef494dac8 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
@@ -285,9 +285,11 @@  static void i2c_imx_dma_request(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
 	if (!dma)
 		return;
 
-	dma->chan_tx = dma_request_slave_channel(dev, "tx");
-	if (!dma->chan_tx) {
-		dev_dbg(dev, "can't request DMA tx channel\n");
+	dma->chan_tx = dma_request_chan(dev, "tx");
+	if (IS_ERR(dma->chan_tx)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(dma->chan_rx);
+		if (ret != -ENODEV && ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+			dev_err(dev, "can't request DMA tx channel (%d)\n", ret);
 		goto fail_al;
 	}
 
@@ -298,13 +300,15 @@  static void i2c_imx_dma_request(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
 	dma_sconfig.direction = DMA_MEM_TO_DEV;
 	ret = dmaengine_slave_config(dma->chan_tx, &dma_sconfig);
 	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_dbg(dev, "can't configure tx channel\n");
+		dev_err(dev, "can't configure tx channel (%d)\n", ret);
 		goto fail_tx;
 	}
 
-	dma->chan_rx = dma_request_slave_channel(dev, "rx");
-	if (!dma->chan_rx) {
-		dev_dbg(dev, "can't request DMA rx channel\n");
+	dma->chan_rx = dma_request_chan(dev, "rx");
+	if (IS_ERR(dma->chan_rx)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(dma->chan_rx);
+		if (ret != -ENODEV && ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+			dev_err(dev, "can't request DMA rx channel (%d)\n", ret);
 		goto fail_tx;
 	}
 
@@ -315,7 +319,7 @@  static void i2c_imx_dma_request(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
 	dma_sconfig.direction = DMA_DEV_TO_MEM;
 	ret = dmaengine_slave_config(dma->chan_rx, &dma_sconfig);
 	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_dbg(dev, "can't configure rx channel\n");
+		dev_err(dev, "can't configure rx channel (%d)\n", ret);
 		goto fail_rx;
 	}
 
@@ -332,7 +336,6 @@  static void i2c_imx_dma_request(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
 	dma_release_channel(dma->chan_tx);
 fail_al:
 	devm_kfree(dev, dma);
-	dev_info(dev, "can't use DMA, using PIO instead.\n");
 }
 
 static void i2c_imx_dma_callback(void *arg)