Comments
Patch
===================================================================
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
return main1 ();
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 1 "vect" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 1 "vect" {
xfail vect_no_align } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Vectorizing an unaligned
access" 1 "vect" { xfail vect_no_align } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Alignment of access forced
using peeling" 1 "vect" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Alignment of access forced
using peeling" 1 "vect" { xfail vect_no_align } } } */
/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "vect" } } */
===================================================================
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
return main1 ();
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 1 "vect" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 1 "vect" {
xfail vect_no_align } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Vectorizing an unaligned
access" 1 "vect" { xfail vect_no_align } } } */
Hi, The loops in gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-3.c and vect-peel-4.c have memory accesses with different misalignment values that cannot all be aligned by peeling. Therefore, these tests are not supposed to get vectorized on vect_no_align targets. This patch xfails the vectorization for such cases. Tested on powerpc64-suse-linux and by Steve on IA64. Committed as obvious. Ira testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-3.c: Expect to fail on vect_no_align targets. * gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-4.c: Likewise. /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Alignment of access forced using peeling" 0 "vect" } } */ /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "vect" } } */