| Message ID | 698923c53dba1a744211581ff830d2294965ff69.1543759351.git.yann.morin.1998@free.fr |
|---|---|
| State | Rejected |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [1/2] toolchain: add binutils bug 20765 to linaro Aarch64be | expand |
Hello, On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 15:04:16 +0100, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > diff --git a/toolchain/toolchain-external/toolchain-external-linaro-aarch64-be/Config.in b/toolchain/toolchain-external/toolchain-external-linaro-aarch64-be/Config.in > index 9e7d2a6233..72d33140da 100644 > --- a/toolchain/toolchain-external/toolchain-external-linaro-aarch64-be/Config.in > +++ b/toolchain/toolchain-external/toolchain-external-linaro-aarch64-be/Config.in > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_LINARO_AARCH64_BE > select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_10 > select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_7 > select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_FORTRAN > + select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_BINUTILS_BUG_20765 Any idea why the aarch64-be toolchain is affected, but not the aarch64 toolchain ? Thanks, Thomas
Thomas, All, On 2018-12-02 17:27 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly: > On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 15:04:16 +0100, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > > diff --git a/toolchain/toolchain-external/toolchain-external-linaro-aarch64-be/Config.in b/toolchain/toolchain-external/toolchain-external-linaro-aarch64-be/Config.in > > index 9e7d2a6233..72d33140da 100644 > > --- a/toolchain/toolchain-external/toolchain-external-linaro-aarch64-be/Config.in > > +++ b/toolchain/toolchain-external/toolchain-external-linaro-aarch64-be/Config.in > > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_LINARO_AARCH64_BE > > select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_10 > > select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_7 > > select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_FORTRAN > > + select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_BINUTILS_BUG_20765 > Any idea why the aarch64-be toolchain is affected, but not the aarch64 > toolchain ? I was expecting that question, so I did my homework first, to get ready to answer it: I have no clue about that. There, that was all I could dig up as a reason. ;-) But more seriously, I think I'll take that patch back, because the uopstream BZ is about aarch64, not aarch64be... Regards, Yann E. MORIN. > Thanks, > > Thomas > -- > Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > https://bootlin.com
diff --git a/toolchain/Config.in b/toolchain/Config.in index bf8ed5bf5b..e6c0e51bcd 100644 --- a/toolchain/Config.in +++ b/toolchain/Config.in @@ -74,6 +74,11 @@ config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_BINUTILS_BUG_19615 config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_BINUTILS_BUG_20006 bool +# https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20765 +# Affect toolchains built with binutils 2.26..2.29 (fixed in binutils 2.30). +config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_BINUTILS_BUG_20765 + bool + # Atomic types can be: # - never lock-free # - sometimes lock-free diff --git a/toolchain/toolchain-external/toolchain-external-linaro-aarch64-be/Config.in b/toolchain/toolchain-external/toolchain-external-linaro-aarch64-be/Config.in index 9e7d2a6233..72d33140da 100644 --- a/toolchain/toolchain-external/toolchain-external-linaro-aarch64-be/Config.in +++ b/toolchain/toolchain-external/toolchain-external-linaro-aarch64-be/Config.in @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_LINARO_AARCH64_BE select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_10 select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_7 select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_FORTRAN + select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_BINUTILS_BUG_20765 help Toolchain for the AArch64 Big Endian architecture, from http://www.linaro.org/engineering/armv8/
This bug has been fixed on the 2.29 branch, but not 2.29 release has been made since then, so consider only 2.30 to have the fix from our point of view. Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> --- toolchain/Config.in | 5 +++++ .../toolchain-external-linaro-aarch64-be/Config.in | 1 + 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)