mbox series

[v3,0/6] Tests for readahead() and fadvise() on overlayfs

Message ID 20181010233441.5337-1-amir73il@gmail.com
Headers show
Series Tests for readahead() and fadvise() on overlayfs | expand

Message

Amir Goldstein Oct. 10, 2018, 11:34 p.m. UTC 
Cyril,

The following series adds test covergae for readahead() syscall
over overlayfs file and adds test coverage for a specific
posix_fadvise() syscall advice (POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED).

So far, the posix_fadvise syscall tests in LTP only test for error
conditions, but not functionality.

The functionality of the advice POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED is identical
to readahead() and since kernel commit 3d8f7615319b ("vfs: implement
readahead(2) using POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED"), the implementations are
also bound together.

To add test coverage of the advice POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED, I decided not
to duplicate the readahead() functional test and add test cases to
readahead02 that use the POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED implementation.

Thanks,
Amir.

Changes since v2:
- Runtime check for readahead/fadvise support
- Abort test case immediately if syscall fail

Changes since v1:
- Fix bugs in loop invocation of test (i.e. -i 2)
- Address review comments from Jan Stancek
- Make cached_max a global maximum over all test cases
- Improve reliability of overlayfs readahead test case failure

Amir Goldstein (6):
  syscalls/readahead01: Convert to newlib
  syscalls/readahead02: Convert to newlib and cleanup
  syscalls/readahead02: abort test if readahead syscall fails
  syscalls/readahead02: test readahead() on an overlayfs file
  syscalls/readahead02: test readahead using posix_fadvise()
  syscalls/readahead02: fail test if readahead did not use any cache

 .../kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead01.c   | 119 ++----
 .../kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c   | 339 +++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 260 deletions(-)

Comments

Amir Goldstein Nov. 2, 2018, 10:32 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 2:34 AM Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Cyril,
>

Ping.

The affected kernel code as well as fix commits are now in v4.19.
Pushed rebased branch to:
https://github.com/amir73il/ltp/commits/overlayfs-devel

Also, there is an unrelated (besides the word "fadvise") cleanup branch
https://github.com/amir73il/ltp/commits/fadvise_cleanup
that converts the fadvise tests to newlib.

Thanks,
Amir.

> The following series adds test covergae for readahead() syscall
> over overlayfs file and adds test coverage for a specific
> posix_fadvise() syscall advice (POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED).
>
> So far, the posix_fadvise syscall tests in LTP only test for error
> conditions, but not functionality.
>
> The functionality of the advice POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED is identical
> to readahead() and since kernel commit 3d8f7615319b ("vfs: implement
> readahead(2) using POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED"), the implementations are
> also bound together.
>
> To add test coverage of the advice POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED, I decided not
> to duplicate the readahead() functional test and add test cases to
> readahead02 that use the POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED implementation.
>
> Thanks,
> Amir.
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Runtime check for readahead/fadvise support
> - Abort test case immediately if syscall fail
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Fix bugs in loop invocation of test (i.e. -i 2)
> - Address review comments from Jan Stancek
> - Make cached_max a global maximum over all test cases
> - Improve reliability of overlayfs readahead test case failure
>
> Amir Goldstein (6):
>   syscalls/readahead01: Convert to newlib
>   syscalls/readahead02: Convert to newlib and cleanup
>   syscalls/readahead02: abort test if readahead syscall fails
>   syscalls/readahead02: test readahead() on an overlayfs file
>   syscalls/readahead02: test readahead using posix_fadvise()
>   syscalls/readahead02: fail test if readahead did not use any cache
>
>  .../kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead01.c   | 119 ++----
>  .../kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c   | 339 +++++++++---------
>  2 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 260 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>