Message ID | 1535968829-19418-1-git-send-email-tony.xie@rock-chips.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | support a new type of PMIC, including two chips(rk817 and rk809) | expand |
On Mon, 03 Sep 2018, Tony Xie wrote: > The rk809 and rk817 are a Power Management IC (PMIC) for multimedia > and handheld devices. It contains the following components: > > - Regulators > - RTC > - Clocking > > Both RK809 and RK817 chips are using a similar register map, > so we can reuse the RTC and Clocking and regulators functionality. > > Signed-off-by: Tony Xie <tony.xie@rock-chips.com> > --- It's often helpful to place a Changelog in this space. > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 6 +- > drivers/mfd/rk808.c | 218 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > include/linux/mfd/rk808.h | 172 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > kernel/reboot.c | 1 + > 4 files changed, 391 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) I just reviewed v4. It looks like the review comments are still relevant.
Quoting Tony Xie (2018-09-03 03:04:00) > RK809 and RK817 are power management IC chips for multimedia products. > most of their functions and registers are same, including the clkout > funciton. > > Signed-off-by: Tony Xie <tony.xie@rock-chips.com> > --- Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
> On Mon, 03 Sep 2018, Tony Xie wrote: > >> The rk809 and rk817 are a Power Management IC (PMIC) for multimedia >> and handheld devices. It contains the following components: >> >> - Regulators >> - RTC >> - Clocking >> >> Both RK809 and RK817 chips are using a similar register map, >> so we can reuse the RTC and Clocking and regulators functionality. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tony Xie <tony.xie@rock-chips.com> >> --- > It's often helpful to place a Changelog in this space. I will output the changelog in the first mail when send-mail. > >> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 6 +- >> drivers/mfd/rk808.c | 218 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >> include/linux/mfd/rk808.h | 172 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> kernel/reboot.c | 1 + >> 4 files changed, 391 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > I just reviewed v4. > > It looks like the review comments are still relevant. I will commit the v5 today which includes some modification base on your comments base in the v3. >