| Message ID | 20180710111345.28481-1-kleber.souza@canonical.com |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Fix for LP: #1753941 | expand |
On 07/10/18 13:13, Kleber Sacilotto de Souza wrote: > BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1753941 > > == SRU Justification == > The ubuntu_bpf_jit test will fail with the following 5 test cases: > > test_bpf: #292 BPF_MAXINSNS: Ctx heavy transformations FAIL to prog_create err=-524 len=4096 > test_bpf: #293 BPF_MAXINSNS: Call heavy transformations FAIL to prog_create err=-524 len=4096 > test_bpf: #298 BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+get_processor_id FAIL to prog_create err=-524 len=4096 > test_bpf: #299 BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+vlan_push/pop FAIL to select_runtime err=-524 > test_bpf: #300 BPF_MAXINSNS: jump around ld_abs FAIL to select_runtime err=-524 > > test_bpf: Summary: 337 PASSED, 5 FAILED, [329/329 JIT'ed] > > And modprobe error can be found in the report as well: > modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'test_bpf': Invalid argument > > Issue can be reproduce on both zVM and Ubuntu on LPAR s390x systems. > > == Fix == > 3203c9010060 ("test_bpf: flag tests that cannot be jited on s390") > > A backport of the fix is needed to compile out "BPF_MAXINSNS: > ld_abs+vlan_push/pop" and "BPF_MAXINSNS: jump around ld_abs" testcases. They > have been removed from lib/test_bpf.c with 93731ef086ce ("bpf: migrate ebpf > ld_abs/ld_ind tests to test_verifier"), however, backporting this patch would > require pulling other patches as prereqs. > > == Regression Potential == > None, the fix is in a test module and only masks failing testcases on s390 only. > > == Test Case == > Load the test_bpf module, it should load without errors. > > Kleber Sacilotto de Souza (1): > test_bpf: flag tests that cannot be jited on s390 > > lib/test_bpf.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) > Applied to bionic/master-next branch. Thanks, Kleber
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1753941 == SRU Justification == The ubuntu_bpf_jit test will fail with the following 5 test cases: test_bpf: #292 BPF_MAXINSNS: Ctx heavy transformations FAIL to prog_create err=-524 len=4096 test_bpf: #293 BPF_MAXINSNS: Call heavy transformations FAIL to prog_create err=-524 len=4096 test_bpf: #298 BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+get_processor_id FAIL to prog_create err=-524 len=4096 test_bpf: #299 BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+vlan_push/pop FAIL to select_runtime err=-524 test_bpf: #300 BPF_MAXINSNS: jump around ld_abs FAIL to select_runtime err=-524 test_bpf: Summary: 337 PASSED, 5 FAILED, [329/329 JIT'ed] And modprobe error can be found in the report as well: modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'test_bpf': Invalid argument Issue can be reproduce on both zVM and Ubuntu on LPAR s390x systems. == Fix == 3203c9010060 ("test_bpf: flag tests that cannot be jited on s390") A backport of the fix is needed to compile out "BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+vlan_push/pop" and "BPF_MAXINSNS: jump around ld_abs" testcases. They have been removed from lib/test_bpf.c with 93731ef086ce ("bpf: migrate ebpf ld_abs/ld_ind tests to test_verifier"), however, backporting this patch would require pulling other patches as prereqs. == Regression Potential == None, the fix is in a test module and only masks failing testcases on s390 only. == Test Case == Load the test_bpf module, it should load without errors. Kleber Sacilotto de Souza (1): test_bpf: flag tests that cannot be jited on s390 lib/test_bpf.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)