Message ID | 20171109234830.5067-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers | expand |
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 08:48:24AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > All Ack-s/Tested-by-s were dropped, since the patch set has been > reworked. I'm kindly asking arch-s maintainers and developers to test it > once again. Sorry for any inconveniences and thanks for your help in > advance. You can add back the: Tested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> #ia64 Apart from my comment about dropping the Examples from the Documentation the series looks OK to me. -Tony
On (11/10/17 10:11), Luck, Tony wrote: > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 08:48:24AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > All Ack-s/Tested-by-s were dropped, since the patch set has been > > reworked. I'm kindly asking arch-s maintainers and developers to test it > > once again. Sorry for any inconveniences and thanks for your help in > > advance. > > You can add back the: > > Tested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> #ia64 Thanks a ton, Tony! -ss
On 10.11.2017 00:48, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > All Ack-s/Tested-by-s were dropped, since the patch set has been > reworked. I'm kindly asking arch-s maintainers and developers to test it > once again. Sorry for any inconveniences and thanks for your help in > advance. I tested it successfully on parisc64. You can add back the Tested-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> #parisc64 Thanks! Helge
On (11/13/17 18:17), Helge Deller wrote: > On 10.11.2017 00:48, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > All Ack-s/Tested-by-s were dropped, since the patch set has been > > reworked. I'm kindly asking arch-s maintainers and developers to test it > > once again. Sorry for any inconveniences and thanks for your help in > > advance. > > I tested it successfully on parisc64. > You can add back the > Tested-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> #parisc64 thanks! -ss
On Fri 2017-11-10 08:48:24, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > Hello, > > A reworked version. There is a new dereference_symbol_descriptor() > function now, where "the magic happens", so I don't touch kallsyms_lookup() > and module_address_lookup() anymore. The new version looks good to me. Thanks a lot for reworking it. I feel much better now. For the whole series: Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> > All Ack-s/Tested-by-s were dropped, since the patch set has been > reworked. I'm kindly asking arch-s maintainers and developers to test it > once again. Sorry for any inconveniences and thanks for your help in > advance. I see that it was tested on all affected architectures. Thanks a lot all testers. It seems that we are ready to go. I am going to push this into for-4.16 branch in printk.git. Best Regards, Petr
On (11/28/17 16:47), Petr Mladek wrote: > On Fri 2017-11-10 08:48:24, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > Hello, > > > > A reworked version. There is a new dereference_symbol_descriptor() > > function now, where "the magic happens", so I don't touch kallsyms_lookup() > > and module_address_lookup() anymore. > > The new version looks good to me. Thanks a lot for reworking it. > I feel much better now. For the whole series: > > Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> > > > All Ack-s/Tested-by-s were dropped, since the patch set has been > > reworked. I'm kindly asking arch-s maintainers and developers to test it > > once again. Sorry for any inconveniences and thanks for your help in > > advance. > > I see that it was tested on all affected architectures. Thanks a lot > all testers. > > It seems that we are ready to go. I am going to push this into > for-4.16 branch in printk.git. thanks. -ss