Message ID | f10055cc-4430-ff30-f892-3d3d6f24354c@sigmadesigns.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Tango PCIe host bridge MSI support + required API | expand |
On 29/08/2017 16:19, Marc Gonzalez wrote: > Bjorn, Marc Z, > > This patch-set includes: > > o [PATCH v11] PCI: tango: Add MSI controller support > with the doorbell address parsed from DT instead of hard-coded > in the driver. > > o A wrapper to parse dma-ranges was added to drivers/of/address.c > > o A few drivers were converted to use the new wrapper > > Marc Gonzalez (3): > of/pci: Add dma-ranges parsing support > PCI: Use of_pci_dma_range_parser_init API > PCI: tango: Add MSI controller support > > drivers/of/address.c | 19 +++- > drivers/pci/host/pci-ftpci100.c | 20 +--- > drivers/pci/host/pci-rcar-gen2.c | 20 +--- > drivers/pci/host/pci-xgene.c | 20 +--- > drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c | 20 +--- > drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c | 20 +--- > drivers/pci/host/pcie-tango.c | 205 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > include/linux/of_address.h | 10 +- > 8 files changed, 232 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-) What's the word on this patch series? Marc Z, Robin: is the computation of pcie->msi_doorbell alright? (Is u64 the correct type for a PCI address?) Should the first two patches be squashed together, in case reverting is required? Regards.