[SRU,trusty/linux-lts-xenial,0/1] fixes for signed-only
mbox series

Message ID 20190212135051.24890-1-apw@canonical.com
Headers show
Series
  • fixes for signed-only
Related show

Message

Andy Whitcroft Feb. 12, 2019, 1:50 p.m. UTC
Following this email is a configuration update for trusty/linux-lts-xenial which
fixes flavour-control.stub to match the rather confusing delta we carry in all lts backports.

At the bottom of this email are two pull requests for trusty/linux-signed-lts-xenial
and trusty/linux-meta-lts-xenial.

Proposing these to fix the current cycle.

-apw

Andy Whitcroft (1):
  UBUNTU: [Config] linux-headers common package is in the linux
    namespace

 debian.xenial/control.d/flavour-control.stub | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Kleber Souza Feb. 12, 2019, 2:41 p.m. UTC | #1
On 2/12/19 2:50 PM, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> Following this email is a configuration update for trusty/linux-lts-xenial which
> fixes flavour-control.stub to match the rather confusing delta we carry in all lts backports.
>
> At the bottom of this email are two pull requests for trusty/linux-signed-lts-xenial
> and trusty/linux-meta-lts-xenial.
>
> Proposing these to fix the current cycle.
>
> -apw
>
> Andy Whitcroft (1):
>   UBUNTU: [Config] linux-headers common package is in the linux
>     namespace
>
>  debian.xenial/control.d/flavour-control.stub | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
Difficult to review it all in a short time, but we can do some install
tests to make sure the packages are being produced correctly.

Acked-by: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza <kleber.souza@canonical.com>
Stefan Bader Feb. 13, 2019, 9:28 a.m. UTC | #2
On 12.02.19 14:50, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> Following this email is a configuration update for trusty/linux-lts-xenial which
> fixes flavour-control.stub to match the rather confusing delta we carry in all lts backports.
> 
> At the bottom of this email are two pull requests for trusty/linux-signed-lts-xenial
> and trusty/linux-meta-lts-xenial.
> 
> Proposing these to fix the current cycle.
> 
> -apw
> 
> Andy Whitcroft (1):
>   UBUNTU: [Config] linux-headers common package is in the linux
>     namespace
> 
>  debian.xenial/control.d/flavour-control.stub | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
Agreed that this likely can only be checked against the resulting packages when
things are applied. I fail to understand what the commit message of the
additional patch (which depends on common headers) wants to say. I am guessing
maybe that we used to produce a headers package for the backport which was the
same as the common one in the originating series and now get rid of it?
If whoever commits the patch has a better wording I would not mind getting this
updated.

Acked-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Kleber Souza Feb. 14, 2019, 8:49 a.m. UTC | #3
On 2/12/19 2:50 PM, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> Following this email is a configuration update for trusty/linux-lts-xenial which
> fixes flavour-control.stub to match the rather confusing delta we carry in all lts backports.
>
> At the bottom of this email are two pull requests for trusty/linux-signed-lts-xenial
> and trusty/linux-meta-lts-xenial.
>
> Proposing these to fix the current cycle.
>
> -apw
>
> Andy Whitcroft (1):
>   UBUNTU: [Config] linux-headers common package is in the linux
>     namespace
>
>  debian.xenial/control.d/flavour-control.stub | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
Applied to trusty/lts-backport-xenial (linux, linux-meta and
linux-signed), with some changes to the wording of the path for
linux-headers.

Thanks,
Kleber