[4/5] lockd: Remove unused nfsd headers #includes

In what history where these ever needed? Well not
any more.

Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
---
 fs/lockd/svc4proc.c |    4 ----
 fs/lockd/svcproc.c  |    4 ----
 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 08:03:12PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> 
> In what history where these ever needed? Well not
> any more.

Applied, thanks.--b.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
> ---
>  fs/lockd/svc4proc.c |    4 ----
>  fs/lockd/svcproc.c  |    4 ----
>  2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/lockd/svc4proc.c b/fs/lockd/svc4proc.c
> index bd173a6..a7966ee 100644
> --- a/fs/lockd/svc4proc.c
> +++ b/fs/lockd/svc4proc.c
> @@ -11,10 +11,6 @@
>  #include <linux/time.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/smp_lock.h>
> -#include <linux/in.h>
> -#include <linux/sunrpc/svc.h>
> -#include <linux/sunrpc/clnt.h>
> -#include <linux/nfsd/nfsd.h>
>  #include <linux/lockd/lockd.h>
>  #include <linux/lockd/share.h>
>  
> diff --git a/fs/lockd/svcproc.c b/fs/lockd/svcproc.c
> index e1d28dd..56c9519 100644
> --- a/fs/lockd/svcproc.c
> +++ b/fs/lockd/svcproc.c
> @@ -11,10 +11,6 @@
>  #include <linux/time.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/smp_lock.h>
> -#include <linux/in.h>
> -#include <linux/sunrpc/svc.h>
> -#include <linux/sunrpc/clnt.h>
> -#include <linux/nfsd/nfsd.h>
>  #include <linux/lockd/lockd.h>
>  #include <linux/lockd/share.h>
>  
> -- 
> 1.6.5.2
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 03:10:11PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 08:03:12PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> > 
> > In what history where these ever needed? Well not
> > any more.
> 
> Applied, thanks.--b.

Um, I said that before I actually tried to compile it....  OK, dropping
for now (assuming I'm missing some earlier patch).

--b.

> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/lockd/svc4proc.c |    4 ----
> >  fs/lockd/svcproc.c  |    4 ----
> >  2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/lockd/svc4proc.c b/fs/lockd/svc4proc.c
> > index bd173a6..a7966ee 100644
> > --- a/fs/lockd/svc4proc.c
> > +++ b/fs/lockd/svc4proc.c
> > @@ -11,10 +11,6 @@
> >  #include <linux/time.h>
> >  #include <linux/slab.h>
> >  #include <linux/smp_lock.h>
> > -#include <linux/in.h>
> > -#include <linux/sunrpc/svc.h>
> > -#include <linux/sunrpc/clnt.h>
> > -#include <linux/nfsd/nfsd.h>
> >  #include <linux/lockd/lockd.h>
> >  #include <linux/lockd/share.h>
> >  
> > diff --git a/fs/lockd/svcproc.c b/fs/lockd/svcproc.c
> > index e1d28dd..56c9519 100644
> > --- a/fs/lockd/svcproc.c
> > +++ b/fs/lockd/svcproc.c
> > @@ -11,10 +11,6 @@
> >  #include <linux/time.h>
> >  #include <linux/slab.h>
> >  #include <linux/smp_lock.h>
> > -#include <linux/in.h>
> > -#include <linux/sunrpc/svc.h>
> > -#include <linux/sunrpc/clnt.h>
> > -#include <linux/nfsd/nfsd.h>
> >  #include <linux/lockd/lockd.h>
> >  #include <linux/lockd/share.h>
> >  
> > -- 
> > 1.6.5.2
> > 
> > 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

On 11/25/2009 10:23 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 03:10:11PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 08:03:12PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>>>
>>> In what history where these ever needed? Well not
>>> any more.
>>
>> Applied, thanks.--b.
> 
> Um, I said that before I actually tried to compile it....  OK, dropping
> for now (assuming I'm missing some earlier patch).
> 
> --b.
> 

OK, I didn't realize it but, yes I have these on top of the previous 6
so it makes sense.

I have posted the previous 6 rebased on your new current tree, have you seen
it? All the patches are the same but [5/6] which has a "version 3". Do I need
to re post?

Thanks
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 02:39:17PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 11/25/2009 10:23 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 03:10:11PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 08:03:12PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> >>>
> >>> In what history where these ever needed? Well not
> >>> any more.
> >>
> >> Applied, thanks.--b.
> > 
> > Um, I said that before I actually tried to compile it....  OK, dropping
> > for now (assuming I'm missing some earlier patch).
> > 
> > --b.
> > 
> 
> OK, I didn't realize it but, yes I have these on top of the previous 6
> so it makes sense.
> 
> I have posted the previous 6 rebased on your new current tree, have you seen
> it? All the patches are the same but [5/6] which has a "version 3". Do I need
> to re post?

Apologies, yes, would you mind reposting?

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html