| Message ID | 20140623182138.GL14420@redhat.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
is this ok to backport to 4.9? testsuite passes without regressions with this patch on the 4.9 branch. Matthias Am 23.06.2014 um 20:21 schrieb Marek Polacek: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 04:39:55PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote: >> --- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr61553.c >> +++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr61553.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ >> +/* PR c/61553 */ >> +/* { dg-do compile } */ >> + >> +void >> +foo (char *s) >> +{ >> + __atomic_store (s, (void *) 0, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST); > > Oops, dg-error disappeared from the final patch. I'm fixing it with > the following. > > 2014-06-23 Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com> > > PR c/61553 > * c-c++-common/pr61553.c (foo): Add dg-error. > > diff --git gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr61553.c gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr61553.c > index fa97e94..8a3b699 100644 > --- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr61553.c > +++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr61553.c > @@ -4,5 +4,5 @@ > void > foo (char *s) > { > - __atomic_store (s, (void *) 0, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST); > + __atomic_store (s, (void *) 0, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST); /* { dg-error "size mismatch" } */ > } > > Marek >
diff --git gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr61553.c gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr61553.c index fa97e94..8a3b699 100644 --- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr61553.c +++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr61553.c @@ -4,5 +4,5 @@ void foo (char *s) { - __atomic_store (s, (void *) 0, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST); + __atomic_store (s, (void *) 0, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST); /* { dg-error "size mismatch" } */ }