[v3,6/7] i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver

On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the
AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded
Controller).  These are:
* The battery (sbs-battery).
* The power management unit tps65090.

On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C
bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using
some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge).

The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some
downsides:
* It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster)
* It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C
* It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues
  were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus).

On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to:
* The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no
  longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication.  The battery was
  exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was
  exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver.

On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now:
* The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds.
* The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel.

The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung
ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the
other side of the bus.

This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2.
Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel
on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access
tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver,
but I haven't researched that enough).

Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---
Changes in v3:
- Separate out packet sizing from packet stuffing.
- Get rid of useless dev_dbg.
- Check command_sendrecv against NULL.
- Don't check np against NULL.
- Get rid of useless error on memory alloc fail.
- Get rid of useless platform_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);

Changes in v2:
- Update tunnel binding as per swarren

 .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.txt |  39 +++
 drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig                         |   9 +
 drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile                        |   1 +
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c            | 318 +++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c                              |   5 +
 5 files changed, 372 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.txt
 create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c

On 04/30/2014 11:44 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the
> AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded
> Controller).  These are:
> * The battery (sbs-battery).
> * The power management unit tps65090.
...
> On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now:
> * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds.
> * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel.
> 
> The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung
> ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the
> other side of the bus.
> 
> This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2.
> Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel
> on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access
> tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver,
> but I haven't researched that enough).

The binding looks reasonable to me, so that part,
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

> +I2C bus that tunnels through the ChromeOS EC (cros-ec)
> +======================================================
> +On some ChromeOS board designs we've got a connection to the EC (embedded
> +controller) but no direct connection to some devices on the other side of
> +the EC (like a battery and PMIC).  To get access to those devices we need
> +to tunnel our i2c commands through the EC.
> +
> +The node for this device should be under a cros-ec node like google,cros-ec-spi
> +or google,cros-ec-i2c.
> +
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: google,cros-ec-i2c-tunnel
> +- google,remote-bus: The EC bus we'd like to talk to.
> +
> +Optional child nodes:
> +- One node per I2C device connected to the tunnelled I2C bus.
> +
> +
> +Example:
> +	cros-ec@0 {
> +		compatible = "google,cros-ec-spi";

Ooookay, now I get it. From the compatible name of this snipplet, I
assumed this node describes only an SPI IP core inside the EC. This is
why I complained about the location of the I2C busses, since placing it
as subnodes of the EC based SPI didn't make sense to me, even though the
connection of the tunnel was SPI. Now I understand that this is the core
driver for the EC, talking to it via SPI. Since this driver is an SPI
child node I would not have expected the "-spi" suffix. Sorry, for this
confusion :/ Now, the bindings make much more sense to me.

> +			google,remote-bus = <0>;

I am still not too happy about this one, but it is good enough for now,
I suppose.

Code looks good, so

Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>

I don't mind how it gets upstream. I can take it, but you can also keep
it in this series.

> Code looks good, so
> 
> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
> 
> I don't mind how it gets upstream. I can take it, but you can also keep
> it in this series.

Let's keep the series together.  Are you happy with me just merging it
through MFD, or would you like a pull-request, so you can take it in
too?

On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 06:22:58PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Code looks good, so
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
> > 
> > I don't mind how it gets upstream. I can take it, but you can also keep
> > it in this series.
> 
> Let's keep the series together.  Are you happy with me just merging it
> through MFD, or would you like a pull-request, so you can take it in
> too?

Just merge it...

> > > Code looks good, so
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
> > > 
> > > I don't mind how it gets upstream. I can take it, but you can also keep
> > > it in this series.
> > 
> > Let's keep the series together.  Are you happy with me just merging it
> > through MFD, or would you like a pull-request, so you can take it in
> > too?
> 
> Just merge it...

Thanks dude.

On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, Doug Anderson wrote:

> On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the
> AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded
> Controller).  These are:
> * The battery (sbs-battery).
> * The power management unit tps65090.
> 
> On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C
> bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using
> some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge).
> 
> The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some
> downsides:
> * It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster)
> * It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C
> * It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues
>   were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus).
> 
> On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to:
> * The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no
>   longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication.  The battery was
>   exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was
>   exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver.
> 
> On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now:
> * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds.
> * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel.
> 
> The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung
> ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the
> other side of the bus.
> 
> This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2.
> Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel
> on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access
> tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver,
> but I haven't researched that enough).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Separate out packet sizing from packet stuffing.
> - Get rid of useless dev_dbg.
> - Check command_sendrecv against NULL.
> - Don't check np against NULL.
> - Get rid of useless error on memory alloc fail.
> - Get rid of useless platform_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Update tunnel binding as per swarren
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.txt |  39 +++
>  drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig                         |   9 +
>  drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile                        |   1 +
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c            | 318 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c                              |   5 +
>  5 files changed, 372 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.txt
>  create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c

Applied, thanks.

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..898f030
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
> +I2C bus that tunnels through the ChromeOS EC (cros-ec)
> +======================================================
> +On some ChromeOS board designs we've got a connection to the EC (embedded
> +controller) but no direct connection to some devices on the other side of
> +the EC (like a battery and PMIC).  To get access to those devices we need
> +to tunnel our i2c commands through the EC.
> +
> +The node for this device should be under a cros-ec node like google,cros-ec-spi
> +or google,cros-ec-i2c.
> +
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: google,cros-ec-i2c-tunnel
> +- google,remote-bus: The EC bus we'd like to talk to.
> +
> +Optional child nodes:
> +- One node per I2C device connected to the tunnelled I2C bus.
> +
> +
> +Example:
> +	cros-ec@0 {
> +		compatible = "google,cros-ec-spi";
> +
> +		...
> +
> +		i2c-tunnel {
> +			compatible = "google,cros-ec-i2c-tunnel";
> +			#address-cells = <1>;
> +			#size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +			google,remote-bus = <0>;
> +
> +			battery: sbs-battery@b {
> +				compatible = "sbs,sbs-battery";
> +				reg = <0xb>;
> +				sbs,poll-retry-count = <1>;
> +			};
> +		};
> +	}
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> index c94db1c..9a0a6cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> @@ -993,6 +993,15 @@ config I2C_SIBYTE
>  	help
>  	  Supports the SiByte SOC on-chip I2C interfaces (2 channels).
>  
> +config I2C_CROS_EC_TUNNEL
> +	tristate "ChromeOS EC tunnel I2C bus"
> +	depends on MFD_CROS_EC
> +	help
> +	  If you say yes here you get an I2C bus that will tunnel i2c commands
> +	  through to the other side of the ChromeOS EC to the i2c bus
> +	  connected there. This will work whatever the interface used to
> +	  talk to the EC (SPI, I2C or LPC).
> +
>  config SCx200_I2C
>  	tristate "NatSemi SCx200 I2C using GPIO pins (DEPRECATED)"
>  	depends on SCx200_GPIO
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile b/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile
> index 18d18ff..e110ca9 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile
> @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_VIPERBOARD)	+= i2c-viperboard.o
>  # Other I2C/SMBus bus drivers
>  obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_ACORN)		+= i2c-acorn.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_BCM_KONA)	+= i2c-bcm-kona.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_CROS_EC_TUNNEL)	+= i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_ELEKTOR)	+= i2c-elektor.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_PCA_ISA)	+= i2c-pca-isa.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_SIBYTE)	+= i2c-sibyte.o
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..8e7a714
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,318 @@
> +/*
> + *  Copyright (C) 2013 Google, Inc
> + *
> + *  This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + *  it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + *  the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> + *  (at your option) any later version.
> + *
> + * Expose an I2C passthrough to the ChromeOS EC.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/cros_ec.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +/**
> + * struct ec_i2c_device - Driver data for I2C tunnel
> + *
> + * @dev: Device node
> + * @adap: I2C adapter
> + * @ec: Pointer to EC device
> + * @remote_bus: The EC bus number we tunnel to on the other side.
> + * @request_buf: Buffer for transmitting data; we expect most transfers to fit.
> + * @response_buf: Buffer for receiving data; we expect most transfers to fit.
> + */
> +
> +struct ec_i2c_device {
> +	struct device *dev;
> +	struct i2c_adapter adap;
> +	struct cros_ec_device *ec;
> +
> +	u16 remote_bus;
> +
> +	u8 request_buf[256];
> +	u8 response_buf[256];
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * ec_i2c_count_message - Count bytes needed for ec_i2c_construct_message
> + *
> + * @i2c_msgs: The i2c messages to read
> + * @num: The number of i2c messages.
> + *
> + * Returns the number of bytes the messages will take up.
> + */
> +static int ec_i2c_count_message(const struct i2c_msg i2c_msgs[], int num)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	int size;
> +
> +	size = sizeof(struct ec_params_i2c_passthru);
> +	size += num * sizeof(struct ec_params_i2c_passthru_msg);
> +	for (i = 0; i < num; i++)
> +		if (!(i2c_msgs[i].flags & I2C_M_RD))
> +			size += i2c_msgs[i].len;
> +
> +	return size;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * ec_i2c_construct_message - construct a message to go to the EC
> + *
> + * This function effectively stuffs the standard i2c_msg format of Linux into
> + * a format that the EC understands.
> + *
> + * @buf: The buffer to fill.  We assume that the buffer is big enough.
> + * @i2c_msgs: The i2c messages to read.
> + * @num: The number of i2c messages.
> + * @bus_num: The remote bus number we want to talk to.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 or a negative error number.
> + */
> +static int ec_i2c_construct_message(u8 *buf, const struct i2c_msg i2c_msgs[],
> +				    int num, u16 bus_num)
> +{
> +	struct ec_params_i2c_passthru *params;
> +	u8 *out_data;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	out_data = buf + sizeof(struct ec_params_i2c_passthru) +
> +		   num * sizeof(struct ec_params_i2c_passthru_msg);
> +
> +	params = (struct ec_params_i2c_passthru *)buf;
> +	params->port = bus_num;
> +	params->num_msgs = num;
> +	for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
> +		const struct i2c_msg *i2c_msg = &i2c_msgs[i];
> +		struct ec_params_i2c_passthru_msg *msg = &params->msg[i];
> +
> +		msg->len = i2c_msg->len;
> +		msg->addr_flags = i2c_msg->addr;
> +
> +		if (i2c_msg->flags & I2C_M_TEN)
> +			msg->addr_flags |= EC_I2C_FLAG_10BIT;
> +
> +		if (i2c_msg->flags & I2C_M_RD) {
> +			msg->addr_flags |= EC_I2C_FLAG_READ;
> +		} else {
> +			memcpy(out_data, i2c_msg->buf, msg->len);
> +			out_data += msg->len;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * ec_i2c_count_response - Count bytes needed for ec_i2c_parse_response
> + *
> + * @i2c_msgs: The i2c messages to to fill up.
> + * @num: The number of i2c messages expected.
> + *
> + * Returns the number of response bytes expeced.
> + */
> +static int ec_i2c_count_response(struct i2c_msg i2c_msgs[], int num)
> +{
> +	int size;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	size = sizeof(struct ec_response_i2c_passthru);
> +	for (i = 0; i < num; i++)
> +		if (i2c_msgs[i].flags & I2C_M_RD)
> +			size += i2c_msgs[i].len;
> +
> +	return size;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * ec_i2c_parse_response - Parse a response from the EC
> + *
> + * We'll take the EC's response and copy it back into msgs.
> + *
> + * @buf: The buffer to parse.
> + * @i2c_msgs: The i2c messages to to fill up.
> + * @num: The number of i2c messages; will be modified to include the actual
> + *	 number received.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 or a negative error number.
> + */
> +static int ec_i2c_parse_response(const u8 *buf, struct i2c_msg i2c_msgs[],
> +				 int *num)
> +{
> +	const struct ec_response_i2c_passthru *resp;
> +	const u8 *in_data;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	in_data = buf + sizeof(struct ec_response_i2c_passthru);
> +
> +	resp = (const struct ec_response_i2c_passthru *)buf;
> +	if (resp->i2c_status & EC_I2C_STATUS_TIMEOUT)
> +		return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +	else if (resp->i2c_status & EC_I2C_STATUS_ERROR)
> +		return -EREMOTEIO;
> +
> +	/* Other side could send us back fewer messages, but not more */
> +	if (resp->num_msgs > *num)
> +		return -EPROTO;
> +	*num = resp->num_msgs;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < *num; i++) {
> +		struct i2c_msg *i2c_msg = &i2c_msgs[i];
> +
> +		if (i2c_msgs[i].flags & I2C_M_RD) {
> +			memcpy(i2c_msg->buf, in_data, i2c_msg->len);
> +			in_data += i2c_msg->len;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ec_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg i2c_msgs[],
> +		       int num)
> +{
> +	struct ec_i2c_device *bus = adap->algo_data;
> +	struct device *dev = bus->dev;
> +	const u16 bus_num = bus->remote_bus;
> +	int request_len;
> +	int response_len;
> +	u8 *request = NULL;
> +	u8 *response = NULL;
> +	int result;
> +
> +	request_len = ec_i2c_count_message(i2c_msgs, num);
> +	if (request_len < 0) {
> +		dev_warn(dev, "Error constructing message %d\n", request_len);
> +		result = request_len;
> +		goto exit;
> +	}
> +	response_len = ec_i2c_count_response(i2c_msgs, num);
> +	if (response_len < 0) {
> +		/* Unexpected; no errors should come when NULL response */
> +		dev_warn(dev, "Error preparing response %d\n", response_len);
> +		result = response_len;
> +		goto exit;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (request_len <= ARRAY_SIZE(bus->request_buf)) {
> +		request = bus->request_buf;
> +	} else {
> +		request = kzalloc(request_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (request == NULL) {
> +			result = -ENOMEM;
> +			goto exit;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	if (response_len <= ARRAY_SIZE(bus->response_buf)) {
> +		response = bus->response_buf;
> +	} else {
> +		response = kzalloc(response_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (response == NULL) {
> +			result = -ENOMEM;
> +			goto exit;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	ec_i2c_construct_message(request, i2c_msgs, num, bus_num);
> +	result = bus->ec->command_sendrecv(bus->ec, EC_CMD_I2C_PASSTHRU,
> +					   request, request_len,
> +					   response, response_len);
> +	if (result)
> +		goto exit;
> +
> +	result = ec_i2c_parse_response(response, i2c_msgs, &num);
> +	if (result < 0)
> +		goto exit;
> +
> +	/* Indicate success by saying how many messages were sent */
> +	result = num;
> +exit:
> +	if (request != bus->request_buf)
> +		kfree(request);
> +	if (response != bus->response_buf)
> +		kfree(response);
> +
> +	return result;
> +}
> +
> +static u32 ec_i2c_functionality(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
> +{
> +	return I2C_FUNC_I2C | I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_EMUL;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct i2c_algorithm ec_i2c_algorithm = {
> +	.master_xfer	= ec_i2c_xfer,
> +	.functionality	= ec_i2c_functionality,
> +};
> +
> +static int ec_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> +	struct cros_ec_device *ec = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct ec_i2c_device *bus = NULL;
> +	u32 remote_bus;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	if (!ec->command_sendrecv) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Missing sendrecv\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	bus = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*bus), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (bus == NULL)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	err = of_property_read_u32(np, "google,remote-bus", &remote_bus);
> +	if (err) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Couldn't read remote-bus property\n");
> +		return err;
> +	}
> +	bus->remote_bus = remote_bus;
> +
> +	bus->ec = ec;
> +	bus->dev = dev;
> +
> +	bus->adap.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> +	strlcpy(bus->adap.name, "cros-ec-i2c-tunnel", sizeof(bus->adap.name));
> +	bus->adap.algo = &ec_i2c_algorithm;
> +	bus->adap.algo_data = bus;
> +	bus->adap.dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
> +	bus->adap.dev.of_node = np;
> +
> +	err = i2c_add_adapter(&bus->adap);
> +	if (err) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "cannot register i2c adapter\n");
> +		return err;
> +	}
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, bus);
> +
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int ec_i2c_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct ec_i2c_device *bus = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	i2c_del_adapter(&bus->adap);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver ec_i2c_tunnel_driver = {
> +	.probe = ec_i2c_probe,
> +	.remove = ec_i2c_remove,
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = "cros-ec-i2c-tunnel",
> +	},
> +};
> +
> +module_platform_driver(ec_i2c_tunnel_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("EC I2C tunnel driver");
> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:cros-ec-i2c-tunnel");
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c
> index c58ab96..61bc909 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c
> @@ -90,6 +90,11 @@ static const struct mfd_cell cros_devs[] = {
>  		.id = 1,
>  		.of_compatible = "google,cros-ec-keyb",
>  	},
> +	{
> +		.name = "cros-ec-i2c-tunnel",
> +		.id = 2,
> +		.of_compatible = "google,cros-ec-i2c-tunnel",
> +	},
>  };
>  
>  int cros_ec_register(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev)