Message ID | CAO2gOZV8DiimCQ+dRT9a9bU3ZTzvcHp4A81kHpgQBJNpGjRkRg@mail.gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
ping... Dehao On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Dehao Chen <dehao@google.com> wrote: > Thanks, test updated: > > Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-8.c > =================================================================== > --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-8.c (revision 0) > +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-8.c (revision 0) > @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ > +/* { dg-do compile { target { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } } */ > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-rtl-expand" } */ > + > +int foo(float a, float b) { > + if (a == b) > + return 1; > + else > + return 2; > +} > + > +/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "REG_BR_PROB 100" 1 "expand"} } */ > +/* { dg-final { cleanup-rtl-dump "expand" } } */ > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:38 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:20:53AM -0800, Dehao Chen wrote: >>>> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-8.c (revision 0) >>>> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-8.c (revision 0) >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ >>>> +/* { dg-do compile { target { x86_64-*-* } } } */ >>> >>> If you want it for x86_64 64-bit, then >>> /* { dg-do compile { target { { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } && lp64 } } } */ >>> >> >> It should be "! { ia32 }" instead of "lp64" unless it doesn't work >> for x32. >> >> -- >> H.J.
ping ^2... Dehao On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Dehao Chen <dehao@google.com> wrote: > ping... > > Dehao > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Dehao Chen <dehao@google.com> wrote: >> Thanks, test updated: >> >> Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-8.c >> =================================================================== >> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-8.c (revision 0) >> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-8.c (revision 0) >> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ >> +/* { dg-do compile { target { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } } */ >> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-rtl-expand" } */ >> + >> +int foo(float a, float b) { >> + if (a == b) >> + return 1; >> + else >> + return 2; >> +} >> + >> +/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "REG_BR_PROB 100" 1 "expand"} } */ >> +/* { dg-final { cleanup-rtl-dump "expand" } } */ >> >> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:38 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote: >>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:20:53AM -0800, Dehao Chen wrote: >>>>> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-8.c (revision 0) >>>>> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-8.c (revision 0) >>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ >>>>> +/* { dg-do compile { target { x86_64-*-* } } } */ >>>> >>>> If you want it for x86_64 64-bit, then >>>> /* { dg-do compile { target { { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } && lp64 } } } */ >>>> >>> >>> It should be "! { ia32 }" instead of "lp64" unless it doesn't work >>> for x32. >>> >>> -- >>> H.J.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Dehao Chen <dehao@google.com> wrote:
> ping ^2...
Assuming this concerns
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg01460.html and
follow-ups.
OK.
Ciao!
Steven
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-8.c =================================================================== --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-8.c (revision 0) +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-8.c (revision 0) @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +/* { dg-do compile { target { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-rtl-expand" } */ + +int foo(float a, float b) { + if (a == b) + return 1; + else + return 2; +} + +/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "REG_BR_PROB 100" 1 "expand"} } */ +/* { dg-final { cleanup-rtl-dump "expand" } } */