| Message ID | 8259832.260591393840570438.JavaMail.weblogic@epml16 |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 09:56:11AM +0000, Kukjin Kim wrote: > The following changes since commit 38dbfb59d1175ef458d006556061adeaa8751b72: > > Linus 3.14-rc1 (2014-02-02 16:42:13 -0800) > > are available in the git repository at: > > http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git tags/samsung-pm-1 > > for you to fetch changes up to e11d919e4aa2009077e3e4f829ff991d37adca61: > > ARM: EXYNOS: Drop legacy Exynos4 clock suspend/resume code (2014-02-14 08:16:01 +0900) Hi, I don't see a single cc or acked-by line from Mike Turquette here. I'll hold off until he's had a chance to take a look at these ones; I suspect they'll be fine since it's mostly code refactoring though. -Olof
On 09.03.2014 19:35, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 09:56:11AM +0000, Kukjin Kim wrote: >> The following changes since commit 38dbfb59d1175ef458d006556061adeaa8751b72: >> >> Linus 3.14-rc1 (2014-02-02 16:42:13 -0800) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> >> http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git tags/samsung-pm-1 >> >> for you to fetch changes up to e11d919e4aa2009077e3e4f829ff991d37adca61: >> >> ARM: EXYNOS: Drop legacy Exynos4 clock suspend/resume code (2014-02-14 08:16:01 +0900) > > Hi, > > I don't see a single cc or acked-by line from Mike Turquette here. I'll hold > off until he's had a chance to take a look at these ones; I suspect they'll be > fine since it's mostly code refactoring though. I guess I should have ACKed them too, but it felt kind of strange to ACK my own patches. ;) Anyway, for all samsung-clk patches: Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com> Best regards, Tomasz
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> wrote: > On 09.03.2014 19:35, Olof Johansson wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 09:56:11AM +0000, Kukjin Kim wrote: >>> >>> The following changes since commit >>> 38dbfb59d1175ef458d006556061adeaa8751b72: >>> >>> Linus 3.14-rc1 (2014-02-02 16:42:13 -0800) >>> >>> are available in the git repository at: >>> >>> http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git >>> tags/samsung-pm-1 >>> >>> for you to fetch changes up to e11d919e4aa2009077e3e4f829ff991d37adca61: >>> >>> ARM: EXYNOS: Drop legacy Exynos4 clock suspend/resume code (2014-02-14 >>> 08:16:01 +0900) >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I don't see a single cc or acked-by line from Mike Turquette here. I'll >> hold >> off until he's had a chance to take a look at these ones; I suspect >> they'll be >> fine since it's mostly code refactoring though. > > > I guess I should have ACKed them too, but it felt kind of strange to ACK my > own patches. ;) > > Anyway, for all samsung-clk patches: > > Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com> Yeah, self-acking doesn't make much sense. :) I'm mostly worried about patches touching other subsystems without the other maintainer being aware of it or having reviewed them. As I said, these mostly look like refactorings but it's still good habit. -Olof
Olof Johansson wrote: > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I don't see a single cc or acked-by line from Mike Turquette here. I'll > >> hold > >> off until he's had a chance to take a look at these ones; I suspect > >> they'll be > >> fine since it's mostly code refactoring though. > > > > > > I guess I should have ACKed them too, but it felt kind of strange to ACK > my > > own patches. ;) > > > > Anyway, for all samsung-clk patches: > > > > Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com> > > Yeah, self-acking doesn't make much sense. :) > > I'm mostly worried about patches touching other subsystems without the > other maintainer being aware of it or having reviewed them. As I said, > these mostly look like refactorings but it's still good habit. > OK, agreed, I think Mike knew about that though. Let's wait for Mike's response. BTW, should I sort out the branch again if Mike gives ack on that? - Kukjin
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote: > Olof Johansson wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I don't see a single cc or acked-by line from Mike Turquette here. I'll >> >> hold >> >> off until he's had a chance to take a look at these ones; I suspect >> >> they'll be >> >> fine since it's mostly code refactoring though. >> > >> > >> > I guess I should have ACKed them too, but it felt kind of strange to ACK >> my >> > own patches. ;) >> > >> > Anyway, for all samsung-clk patches: >> > >> > Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com> >> >> Yeah, self-acking doesn't make much sense. :) >> >> I'm mostly worried about patches touching other subsystems without the >> other maintainer being aware of it or having reviewed them. As I said, >> these mostly look like refactorings but it's still good habit. >> > OK, agreed, I think Mike knew about that though. Let's wait for Mike's > response. > > BTW, should I sort out the branch again if Mike gives ack on that? If I hear from Mike that he's OK with it then I can merge it, no need to rebase. -Olof
Hi Mike, On 10.03.2014 01:08, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 09.03.2014 19:35, Olof Johansson wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 09:56:11AM +0000, Kukjin Kim wrote: >>>> >>>> The following changes since commit >>>> 38dbfb59d1175ef458d006556061adeaa8751b72: >>>> >>>> Linus 3.14-rc1 (2014-02-02 16:42:13 -0800) >>>> >>>> are available in the git repository at: >>>> >>>> http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git >>>> tags/samsung-pm-1 >>>> >>>> for you to fetch changes up to e11d919e4aa2009077e3e4f829ff991d37adca61: >>>> >>>> ARM: EXYNOS: Drop legacy Exynos4 clock suspend/resume code (2014-02-14 >>>> 08:16:01 +0900) >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I don't see a single cc or acked-by line from Mike Turquette here. I'll >>> hold >>> off until he's had a chance to take a look at these ones; I suspect >>> they'll be >>> fine since it's mostly code refactoring though. >> >> >> I guess I should have ACKed them too, but it felt kind of strange to ACK my >> own patches. ;) >> >> Anyway, for all samsung-clk patches: >> >> Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com> > > Yeah, self-acking doesn't make much sense. :) > > I'm mostly worried about patches touching other subsystems without the > other maintainer being aware of it or having reviewed them. As I said, > these mostly look like refactorings but it's still good habit. May we get your ACK for this? I hope it's not too late already to have them merged for 3.15. Best regards, Tomasz
Quoting Olof Johansson (2014-03-10 19:52:01) > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote: > > Olof Johansson wrote: > >> > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> I don't see a single cc or acked-by line from Mike Turquette here. I'll > >> >> hold > >> >> off until he's had a chance to take a look at these ones; I suspect > >> >> they'll be > >> >> fine since it's mostly code refactoring though. > >> > > >> > > >> > I guess I should have ACKed them too, but it felt kind of strange to ACK > >> my > >> > own patches. ;) > >> > > >> > Anyway, for all samsung-clk patches: > >> > > >> > Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com> > >> > >> Yeah, self-acking doesn't make much sense. :) > >> > >> I'm mostly worried about patches touching other subsystems without the > >> other maintainer being aware of it or having reviewed them. As I said, > >> these mostly look like refactorings but it's still good habit. > >> > > OK, agreed, I think Mike knew about that though. Let's wait for Mike's > > response. > > > > BTW, should I sort out the branch again if Mike gives ack on that? > > If I hear from Mike that he's OK with it then I can merge it, no need to rebase. Acked-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org> > > > -Olof
On 03/19/14 13:01, Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Olof Johansson (2014-03-10 19:52:01) >> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Kukjin Kim<kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote: >>> Olof Johansson wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't see a single cc or acked-by line from Mike Turquette here. I'll >>>>>> hold >>>>>> off until he's had a chance to take a look at these ones; I suspect >>>>>> they'll be >>>>>> fine since it's mostly code refactoring though. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I guess I should have ACKed them too, but it felt kind of strange to ACK >>>> my >>>>> own patches. ;) >>>>> >>>>> Anyway, for all samsung-clk patches: >>>>> >>>>> Acked-by: Tomasz Figa<t.figa@samsung.com> >>>> >>>> Yeah, self-acking doesn't make much sense. :) >>>> >>>> I'm mostly worried about patches touching other subsystems without the >>>> other maintainer being aware of it or having reviewed them. As I said, >>>> these mostly look like refactorings but it's still good habit. >>>> >>> OK, agreed, I think Mike knew about that though. Let's wait for Mike's >>> response. >>> >>> BTW, should I sort out the branch again if Mike gives ack on that? >> >> If I hear from Mike that he's OK with it then I can merge it, no need to rebase. > Thanks :-) > Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org> > It's time. Please pull this [5/6] and "[GIT PULL 6/6] Samsung clk-s3c24xx updates for v3.15". Thanks, Kukjin
Kukjin Kim wrote: > > On 03/19/14 13:01, Mike Turquette wrote: > > Quoting Olof Johansson (2014-03-10 19:52:01) > >> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Kukjin Kim<kgene.kim@samsung.com> > wrote: > >>> Olof Johansson wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I don't see a single cc or acked-by line from Mike Turquette here. > I'll > >>>>>> hold > >>>>>> off until he's had a chance to take a look at these ones; I suspect > >>>>>> they'll be > >>>>>> fine since it's mostly code refactoring though. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> I guess I should have ACKed them too, but it felt kind of strange to > ACK > >>>> my > >>>>> own patches. ;) > >>>>> > >>>>> Anyway, for all samsung-clk patches: > >>>>> > >>>>> Acked-by: Tomasz Figa<t.figa@samsung.com> > >>>> > >>>> Yeah, self-acking doesn't make much sense. :) > >>>> > >>>> I'm mostly worried about patches touching other subsystems without > the > >>>> other maintainer being aware of it or having reviewed them. As I said, > >>>> these mostly look like refactorings but it's still good habit. > >>>> > >>> OK, agreed, I think Mike knew about that though. Let's wait for Mike's > >>> response. > >>> > >>> BTW, should I sort out the branch again if Mike gives ack on that? > >> > >> If I hear from Mike that he's OK with it then I can merge it, no need > to rebase. > > > Thanks :-) > > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org> > > > It's time. Please pull this [5/6] and "[GIT PULL 6/6] Samsung > clk-s3c24xx updates for v3.15". > Hi Arnd, Olof and Mike, Still I cannot see this in arm-soc. Any problems? - Kukjin
On Friday 28 March 2014, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > > On 03/19/14 13:01, Mike Turquette wrote: > > > > > Thanks :-) > > > > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org> > > > > > It's time. Please pull this [5/6] and "[GIT PULL 6/6] Samsung > > clk-s3c24xx updates for v3.15". > > > Hi Arnd, Olof and Mike, > > Still I cannot see this in arm-soc. Any problems? > Sorry, I didn't have this one on my radar any more, merged into next/drivers now. Arnd
Hi Arnd, Am Samstag, 29. März 2014, 02:47:33 schrieb Arnd Bergmann: > On Friday 28 March 2014, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > On 03/19/14 13:01, Mike Turquette wrote: > > > > > > Thanks :-) > > > > > > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org> > > > > > > It's time. Please pull this [5/6] and "[GIT PULL 6/6] Samsung > > > clk-s3c24xx updates for v3.15". > > > > Hi Arnd, Olof and Mike, > > > > Still I cannot see this in arm-soc. Any problems? > > Sorry, I didn't have this one on my radar any more, merged into > next/drivers now. maybe you could also take a look at the depending "[GIT PULL 6/6] Samsung clk- s3c24xx updates for v3.15" we walked about at the beginning of the week? :-) Thanks Heiko
Heiko Stübner wrote: > > Hi Arnd, > > Am Samstag, 29. März 2014, 02:47:33 schrieb Arnd Bergmann: > > On Friday 28 March 2014, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > > On 03/19/14 13:01, Mike Turquette wrote: > > > > > > > > Thanks :-) > > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org> > > > > > > > > It's time. Please pull this [5/6] and "[GIT PULL 6/6] Samsung > > > > clk-s3c24xx updates for v3.15". > > > > > > Hi Arnd, Olof and Mike, > > > > > > Still I cannot see this in arm-soc. Any problems? > > > > Sorry, I didn't have this one on my radar any more, merged into > > next/drivers now. > > maybe you could also take a look at the depending "[GIT PULL 6/6] Samsung > clk- > s3c24xx updates for v3.15" we walked about at the beginning of the > week? :-) > Yeah, so I've informed that [5/6] and [6/6] is needed... Arnd, Olof and Mike, Probably you guys missed "[6/6] Samsung clk-s3c24xx updates" when dependency with [5/6] has been cleared but since it's already 3.15 merge window, I'm not sure it can be sent to Linus in this time... - Kukjin
Quoting Kukjin Kim (2014-04-01 21:25:45) > Heiko Stübner wrote: > > > > Hi Arnd, > > > > Am Samstag, 29. März 2014, 02:47:33 schrieb Arnd Bergmann: > > > On Friday 28 March 2014, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > > Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > > > On 03/19/14 13:01, Mike Turquette wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Thanks :-) > > > > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org> > > > > > > > > > > It's time. Please pull this [5/6] and "[GIT PULL 6/6] Samsung > > > > > clk-s3c24xx updates for v3.15". > > > > > > > > Hi Arnd, Olof and Mike, > > > > > > > > Still I cannot see this in arm-soc. Any problems? > > > > > > Sorry, I didn't have this one on my radar any more, merged into > > > next/drivers now. > > > > maybe you could also take a look at the depending "[GIT PULL 6/6] Samsung > > clk- > > s3c24xx updates for v3.15" we walked about at the beginning of the > > week? :-) > > > Yeah, so I've informed that [5/6] and [6/6] is needed... > > Arnd, Olof and Mike, > > Probably you guys missed "[6/6] Samsung clk-s3c24xx updates" when dependency > with [5/6] has been cleared but since it's already 3.15 merge window, I'm > not sure it can be sent to Linus in this time... Both PRs were Acked by me, so no problems from my end. Pretty late for 3.15 though. Regards, Mike > > - Kukjin >
Mike Turquette wrote: > > Quoting Kukjin Kim (2014-04-01 21:25:45) > > Heiko Stübner wrote: > > > > > > Hi Arnd, > > > > > > Am Samstag, 29. März 2014, 02:47:33 schrieb Arnd Bergmann: > > > > On Friday 28 March 2014, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > > > Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > > > > On 03/19/14 13:01, Mike Turquette wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > It's time. Please pull this [5/6] and "[GIT PULL 6/6] Samsung > > > > > > clk-s3c24xx updates for v3.15". > > > > > > > > > > Hi Arnd, Olof and Mike, > > > > > > > > > > Still I cannot see this in arm-soc. Any problems? > > > > > > > > Sorry, I didn't have this one on my radar any more, merged into > > > > next/drivers now. > > > > > > maybe you could also take a look at the depending "[GIT PULL 6/6] > Samsung > > > clk- > > > s3c24xx updates for v3.15" we walked about at the beginning of the > > > week? :-) > > > > > Yeah, so I've informed that [5/6] and [6/6] is needed... > > > > Arnd, Olof and Mike, > > > > Probably you guys missed "[6/6] Samsung clk-s3c24xx updates" when > dependency > > with [5/6] has been cleared but since it's already 3.15 merge window, > I'm > > not sure it can be sent to Linus in this time... > > Both PRs were Acked by me, so no problems from my end. Pretty late for > 3.15 though. > Yeah, I know. I mean 'Arnd, Olof and Kevin' ;-) BTW, hmm...I know, it's too late for v3.15...so...unfortunately maybe I should queue it for v3.16?... - Kukjin
Am Donnerstag, 3. April 2014, 18:24:25 schrieb Kukjin Kim: > Mike Turquette wrote: > > Quoting Kukjin Kim (2014-04-01 21:25:45) > > > > > Heiko Stübner wrote: > > > > Hi Arnd, > > > > > > > > Am Samstag, 29. März 2014, 02:47:33 schrieb Arnd Bergmann: > > > > > On Friday 28 March 2014, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > > > > Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > > > > > On 03/19/14 13:01, Mike Turquette wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's time. Please pull this [5/6] and "[GIT PULL 6/6] Samsung > > > > > > > clk-s3c24xx updates for v3.15". > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Arnd, Olof and Mike, > > > > > > > > > > > > Still I cannot see this in arm-soc. Any problems? > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, I didn't have this one on my radar any more, merged into > > > > > next/drivers now. > > > > > > > > maybe you could also take a look at the depending "[GIT PULL 6/6] > > > > Samsung > > > > > > clk- > > > > s3c24xx updates for v3.15" we walked about at the beginning of the > > > > week? :-) > > > > > > Yeah, so I've informed that [5/6] and [6/6] is needed... > > > > > > Arnd, Olof and Mike, > > > > > > Probably you guys missed "[6/6] Samsung clk-s3c24xx updates" when > > > > dependency > > > > > with [5/6] has been cleared but since it's already 3.15 merge window, > > > > I'm > > > > > not sure it can be sent to Linus in this time... > > > > Both PRs were Acked by me, so no problems from my end. Pretty late for > > 3.15 though. > > Yeah, I know. I mean 'Arnd, Olof and Kevin' ;-) > > BTW, hmm...I know, it's too late for v3.15...so...unfortunately maybe I > should queue it for v3.16?... I guess this would be the best option. I should also be able to finish the s3c2410/2440/2442 conversion until then, which needs a bit more work. Heiko
Heiko Stübner wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 3. April 2014, 18:24:25 schrieb Kukjin Kim: > > Mike Turquette wrote: > > > Quoting Kukjin Kim (2014-04-01 21:25:45) > > > > > > > Heiko Stübner wrote: > > > > > Hi Arnd, > > > > > > > > > > Am Samstag, 29. März 2014, 02:47:33 schrieb Arnd Bergmann: > > > > > > On Friday 28 March 2014, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > > > > > Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > > > > > > On 03/19/14 13:01, Mike Turquette wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's time. Please pull this [5/6] and "[GIT PULL 6/6] > Samsung > > > > > > > > clk-s3c24xx updates for v3.15". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Arnd, Olof and Mike, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Still I cannot see this in arm-soc. Any problems? > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, I didn't have this one on my radar any more, merged into > > > > > > next/drivers now. > > > > > > > > > > maybe you could also take a look at the depending "[GIT PULL 6/6] > > > > > > Samsung > > > > > > > > clk- > > > > > s3c24xx updates for v3.15" we walked about at the beginning of the > > > > > week? :-) > > > > > > > > Yeah, so I've informed that [5/6] and [6/6] is needed... > > > > > > > > Arnd, Olof and Mike, > > > > > > > > Probably you guys missed "[6/6] Samsung clk-s3c24xx updates" when > > > > > > dependency > > > > > > > with [5/6] has been cleared but since it's already 3.15 merge window, > > > > > > I'm > > > > > > > not sure it can be sent to Linus in this time... > > > > > > Both PRs were Acked by me, so no problems from my end. Pretty late for > > > 3.15 though. > > > > Yeah, I know. I mean 'Arnd, Olof and Kevin' ;-) > > > > BTW, hmm...I know, it's too late for v3.15...so...unfortunately maybe I > > should queue it for v3.16?... > > I guess this would be the best option. I should also be able to finish the > s3c2410/2440/2442 conversion until then, which needs a bit more work. > Hi Heiko, OK, I will rebase the branch once 3.15-rc1 is ready for 3.16. Thanks and Sorry ;-) - Kukjin
The following changes since commit 38dbfb59d1175ef458d006556061adeaa8751b72: Linus 3.14-rc1 (2014-02-02 16:42:13 -0800) are available in the git repository at: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git tags/samsung-pm-1 for you to fetch changes up to e11d919e4aa2009077e3e4f829ff991d37adca61: ARM: EXYNOS: Drop legacy Exynos4 clock suspend/resume code (2014-02-14 08:16:01 +0900) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Samsung S2R PM updates for v3.15 >From Tomasz Figa: This series reworks suspend/resume handling of Samsung clock drivers to cover more SoC specific aspects that are beyond simple register save and restore. The goal is to have all the suspend/resume code that touches the clock controller in single place, which is the clock driver. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Tomasz Figa (9): clk: exynos4: Remove remnants of non-DT support clk: samsung: Provide common helpers for register save/restore clk: samsung: exynos4: Move suspend/resume handling to SoC driver clk: samsung: exynos5250: Move suspend/resume handling to SoC driver clk: samsung: exynos5420: Move suspend/resume handling to SoC driver clk: samsung: s3c64xx: Move suspend/resume handling to SoC driver clk: samsung: Drop old suspend/resume code clk: samsung: exynos4: Add remaining suspend/resume handling ARM: EXYNOS: Drop legacy Exynos4 clock suspend/resume code arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 148 +---------------------------- drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c | 172 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c | 49 +++++++++- drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c | 49 +++++++++- drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5440.c | 2 +- drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c64xx.c | 79 +++++++++++++--- drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c | 71 +++++--------- drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h | 14 ++- 8 files changed, 348 insertions(+), 236 deletions(-)