| Message ID | 20090618233752.GA13279@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted, archived |
| Commit | 66c6b856d8738278a4a6e558d25c90e9950aa112 |
| Delegated to: | Kumar Gala |
| Headers | show |
On Jun 18, 2009, at 6:37 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > For yet unknown reason 4-bit mode doesn't work on MPC8569E-MDS boards, > so make 1-bit mode default. When we resolve the issue, u-boot will > remove sdhci,1-bit-only property from the device tree, while SDHCI > will still work with older u-boots. > > Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com> > --- > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8569mds.dts | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Did I miss the patch that adds this property defn. to our docs? - k
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 09:25:46PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Jun 18, 2009, at 6:37 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > >> For yet unknown reason 4-bit mode doesn't work on MPC8569E-MDS boards, >> so make 1-bit mode default. When we resolve the issue, u-boot will >> remove sdhci,1-bit-only property from the device tree, while SDHCI >> will still work with older u-boots. >> >> Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com> >> --- >> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8569mds.dts | 1 + >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > Did I miss the patch that adds this property defn. to our docs? Yep. ;-) http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-June/073394.html Thanks,
On Jun 19, 2009, at 10:31 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 09:25:46PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: >> >> On Jun 18, 2009, at 6:37 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: >> >>> For yet unknown reason 4-bit mode doesn't work on MPC8569E-MDS >>> boards, >>> so make 1-bit mode default. When we resolve the issue, u-boot will >>> remove sdhci,1-bit-only property from the device tree, while SDHCI >>> will still work with older u-boots. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com> >>> --- >>> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8569mds.dts | 1 + >>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> Did I miss the patch that adds this property defn. to our docs? > > Yep. ;-) > > http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-June/073394.html Ok. I'll wait for Pierre to ack or pick up that patch before pulling in the .dts change. - k
On Jun 18, 2009, at 6:37 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > For yet unknown reason 4-bit mode doesn't work on MPC8569E-MDS boards, > so make 1-bit mode default. When we resolve the issue, u-boot will > remove sdhci,1-bit-only property from the device tree, while SDHCI > will still work with older u-boots. > > Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com> > --- > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8569mds.dts | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) applied to next - k
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8569mds.dts b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8569mds.dts index 39c2927..63e8109 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8569mds.dts +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8569mds.dts @@ -229,6 +229,7 @@ /* Filled in by U-Boot */ clock-frequency = <0>; status = "disabled"; + sdhci,1-bit-only; }; crypto@30000 {
For yet unknown reason 4-bit mode doesn't work on MPC8569E-MDS boards, so make 1-bit mode default. When we resolve the issue, u-boot will remove sdhci,1-bit-only property from the device tree, while SDHCI will still work with older u-boots. Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com> --- arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8569mds.dts | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)