diff mbox

[v3,20/36] mtd: st_spi_fsm: Provide a method to put the chip into 32bit addressing mode

Message ID 1385727565-25794-21-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org
State Superseded
Headers show

Commit Message

Lee Jones Nov. 29, 2013, 12:19 p.m. UTC
Most Serial Flash chips support 24bit addressing as a default but more
recent incarnations can support 32bit. Based on information provided
though platform specific data and capabilities we can determine whether
or not our current chip can. This patch provides a means to setup the
FSM message sequence to put the chip into 32bit mode.

Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/mtd/devices/st_spi_fsm.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

Comments

Brian Norris Dec. 11, 2013, 1:49 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:19:09PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> --- a/drivers/mtd/devices/st_spi_fsm.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/st_spi_fsm.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@
>  #include "st_spi_fsm.h"
>  #include "serial_flash_cmds.h"
>  
> +static struct stfsm_seq stfsm_seq_en_32bit_addr;/* Dynamically populated */

You need a space between the semicolon and the comment.

But why isn't this struct just embedded in the struct stfsm? I don't
like static instances like this, especially when they are dynamically
configured (as your comment notes). In the crazy even that we ever have
two of these FSMs on an SoC (can this happen?), you'll be introducing a
race on needlessly-shared data.

The same comment applies to your later structs stfsm_seq_read and
stfsm_seq_write.

Brian
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/devices/st_spi_fsm.c b/drivers/mtd/devices/st_spi_fsm.c
index 4edd3f2..325fd7a 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/devices/st_spi_fsm.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/st_spi_fsm.c
@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ 
 #include "st_spi_fsm.h"
 #include "serial_flash_cmds.h"
 
+static struct stfsm_seq stfsm_seq_en_32bit_addr;/* Dynamically populated */
+
 static struct stfsm_seq stfsm_seq_read_jedec = {
 	.data_size = TRANSFER_SIZE(8),
 	.seq_opc[0] = (SEQ_OPC_PADS_1 |
@@ -170,6 +172,23 @@  static void stfsm_read_fifo(struct stfsm *fsm, uint32_t *buf,
 	}
 }
 
+static int stfsm_enter_32bit_addr(struct stfsm *fsm, int enter)
+{
+	struct stfsm_seq *seq = &stfsm_seq_en_32bit_addr;
+	uint32_t cmd = enter ? FLASH_CMD_EN4B_ADDR : FLASH_CMD_EX4B_ADDR;
+
+	seq->seq_opc[0] = (SEQ_OPC_PADS_1 |
+			   SEQ_OPC_CYCLES(8) |
+			   SEQ_OPC_OPCODE(cmd) |
+			   SEQ_OPC_CSDEASSERT);
+
+	stfsm_load_seq(fsm, seq);
+
+	stfsm_wait_seq(fsm);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * SoC reset on 'boot-from-spi' systems
  *