Message ID | 20090404192802.GA12183@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded, archived |
Delegated to: | Kumar Gala |
Headers | show |
On Apr 4, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > With this patch we'll able to select spi_mpc83xx driver on the MPC86xx > platforms. Let the driver depend on FSL_SOC, so we don't have to worry > about Kconfig anymore. > > Also remove the "experimental" dependency, the driver has been tested > to work on a various hardware, and surely not experimental anymore. > > Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com> > --- > drivers/spi/Kconfig | 14 ++++++-------- > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) this looks fine, but why don't we go ahead and rename things as well? SPI_MPC83xx -> SPI_MPC8xxx, spi_mpc83xx.c -> spi_mpc8xxx.c - k
Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Apr 4, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > >> With this patch we'll able to select spi_mpc83xx driver on the MPC86xx >> platforms. Let the driver depend on FSL_SOC, so we don't have to worry >> about Kconfig anymore. >> >> Also remove the "experimental" dependency, the driver has been tested >> to work on a various hardware, and surely not experimental anymore. >> >> Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com> >> --- >> drivers/spi/Kconfig | 14 ++++++-------- >> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > this looks fine, but why don't we go ahead and rename things as well? > SPI_MPC83xx -> SPI_MPC8xxx, spi_mpc83xx.c -> spi_mpc8xxx.c mpc8xxx implies mpc82xx (e.g. mpc8272) which is not the same controller as on the mpc83xx
On Apr 6, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: > Kumar Gala wrote: >> >> On Apr 4, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: >> >>> With this patch we'll able to select spi_mpc83xx driver on the >>> MPC86xx >>> platforms. Let the driver depend on FSL_SOC, so we don't have to >>> worry >>> about Kconfig anymore. >>> >>> Also remove the "experimental" dependency, the driver has been >>> tested >>> to work on a various hardware, and surely not experimental anymore. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/spi/Kconfig | 14 ++++++-------- >>> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> >> this looks fine, but why don't we go ahead and rename things as well? >> SPI_MPC83xx -> SPI_MPC8xxx, spi_mpc83xx.c -> spi_mpc8xxx.c > > mpc8xxx implies mpc82xx (e.g. mpc8272) which is not the same > controller > as on the mpc83xx True, but normally the 82xx drivers are "cpm" prefixed. I think 8xxx is at better name than 83xx. - k
diff --git a/drivers/spi/Kconfig b/drivers/spi/Kconfig index 83a185d..3c1845c 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/spi/Kconfig @@ -140,16 +140,14 @@ config SPI_MPC52xx_PSC Controller in master SPI mode. config SPI_MPC83xx - tristate "Freescale MPC83xx/QUICC Engine SPI controller" - depends on (PPC_83xx || QUICC_ENGINE) && EXPERIMENTAL + tristate "Freescale MPC8xxx SPI controller" + depends on FSL_SOC help - This enables using the Freescale MPC83xx and QUICC Engine SPI - controllers in master mode. + This enables using the Freescale MPC8xxx SPI controllers in master + mode. - Note, this driver uniquely supports the SPI controller on the MPC83xx - family of PowerPC processors, plus processors with QUICC Engine - technology. This driver uses a simple set of shift registers for data - (opposed to the CPM based descriptor model). + This driver uses a simple set of shift registers for data (opposed + to the CPM based descriptor model). config SPI_OMAP_UWIRE tristate "OMAP1 MicroWire"
With this patch we'll able to select spi_mpc83xx driver on the MPC86xx platforms. Let the driver depend on FSL_SOC, so we don't have to worry about Kconfig anymore. Also remove the "experimental" dependency, the driver has been tested to work on a various hardware, and surely not experimental anymore. Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com> --- drivers/spi/Kconfig | 14 ++++++-------- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)