Message ID | 20130705092835.GA15500@adacore.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On 07/05/2013 11:28 AM, Thomas Quinot wrote: > 2013-07-06 Thomas Quinot <quinot@adacore.com> > > gcc/ > * tree-complex.c: Fix minor typo in comment > > OK to commit? I think this falls under the "obvious" rule. (But your date in the changelog is off.)
On 07/05/2013 11:28 AM, Thomas Quinot wrote: > 2013-07-06 Thomas Quinot <quinot@adacore.com> > > gcc/ > * tree-complex.c: Fix minor typo in comment > > OK to commit? In my opinion this qualifies as obvious. Paolo.
diff --git a/gcc/tree-complex.c b/gcc/tree-complex.c index c45ba19..acd0169 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-complex.c +++ b/gcc/tree-complex.c @@ -1476,7 +1476,7 @@ expand_complex_operations_1 (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi) case EQ_EXPR: case NE_EXPR: /* Note, both GIMPLE_ASSIGN and GIMPLE_COND may have an EQ_EXPR - subocde, so we need to access the operands using gimple_op. */ + subcode, so we need to access the operands using gimple_op. */ inner_type = TREE_TYPE (gimple_op (stmt, 1)); if (TREE_CODE (inner_type) != COMPLEX_TYPE) return;