diff mbox

[PATCHv3,10/11] arm: mvebu: indicate that this platform supports MSI

Message ID 1371660979-21588-11-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com
State Not Applicable
Headers show

Commit Message

Thomas Petazzoni June 19, 2013, 4:56 p.m. UTC
Now that all the pieces are in place, we can adjust the
mach-mvebu/Kconfig file to indicate that this platform supports MSIs.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Thierry Reding June 21, 2013, 10:28 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 06:56:18PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Now that all the pieces are in place, we can adjust the
> mach-mvebu/Kconfig file to indicate that this platform supports MSIs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig
> index 9eb63d7..36951b1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ config ARCH_MVEBU
>  	select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
>  	select MIGHT_HAVE_PCI
>  	select PCI_QUIRKS if PCI
> +	select ARCH_SUPPORTS_MSI if PCI

I think we can get rid of ARCH_SUPPORTS_MSI now. I actually wrote a
patch once to do that but haven't posted it yet. The reason is that
the new weak functions do the right thing if MSI isn't supported by
some architecture or platform.

Thierry
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig
index 9eb63d7..36951b1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@  config ARCH_MVEBU
 	select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
 	select MIGHT_HAVE_PCI
 	select PCI_QUIRKS if PCI
+	select ARCH_SUPPORTS_MSI if PCI
 
 if ARCH_MVEBU