Message ID | 20130527185436.GN31290@titan.lakedaemon.net |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Hi, On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 02:54:36PM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote: > Thomas Petazzoni (2): > arm: mvebu: fix length of SATA registers area in .dtsi > arm: mvebu: fix length of Ethernet registers area in .dtsi Is this an actual regression in 3.10? I can understand having to fix this before the static mapping is removed, but if it's still there for 3.10, then it makes more sense to queue these fixes for 3.11 (we tend to collect a "fixes-non-critical" that is merged before any other branches in the next merge window). -Olof
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 07:31:58PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 02:54:36PM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote: > > > Thomas Petazzoni (2): > > arm: mvebu: fix length of SATA registers area in .dtsi > > arm: mvebu: fix length of Ethernet registers area in .dtsi > > Is this an actual regression in 3.10? Nope, it's just wrong. :) > I can understand having to fix this before the static mapping is removed, > but if it's still there for 3.10, then it makes more sense to queue these > fixes for 3.11 (we tend to collect a "fixes-non-critical" that is merged > before any other branches in the next merge window). ok, please drop this PR, I'll rework this and submit fresh ones. thx, Jason.