Message ID | 1369410151-7837-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Hi, I'll pull this for now, but... > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD (1): > ARM: at91: at91sam9n12: move external irq declatation to DT This one is not a fix. While OK this time, please stick to only sending true fixes for 3.10 from here on out. -Olof
On 10:11 Fri 24 May , Olof Johansson wrote: > Hi, > > I'll pull this for now, but... > > > > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD (1): > > ARM: at91: at91sam9n12: move external irq declatation to DT > > This one is not a fix. While OK this time, please stick to only > sending true fixes for 3.10 from here on out. it's as you must specify them via DT, the C code is not event use in case of DT I should have put fix in the commit Best Regards, J. > > > -Olof > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> wrote: > On 10:11 Fri 24 May , Olof Johansson wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'll pull this for now, but... >> >> >> > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD (1): >> > ARM: at91: at91sam9n12: move external irq declatation to DT >> >> This one is not a fix. While OK this time, please stick to only >> sending true fixes for 3.10 from here on out. > > it's as you must specify them via DT, the C code is not event use in case of > DT > I should have put fix in the commit > I don't understand. -Olof
On 10:25 Fri 24 May , Olof Johansson wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> wrote: > > On 10:11 Fri 24 May , Olof Johansson wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'll pull this for now, but... > >> > >> > >> > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD (1): > >> > ARM: at91: at91sam9n12: move external irq declatation to DT > >> > >> This one is not a fix. While OK this time, please stick to only > >> sending true fixes for 3.10 from here on out. > > > > it's as you must specify them via DT, the C code is not event use in case of > > DT > > I should have put fix in the commit > > > > I don't understand. for DT SoC you must use dt to descrive the external irq on at91 now the sam9n12 (dt-only soc) was not converted when we did it this commit fix it Best Regards, J.