| Message ID | 1369410151-7837-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
Hi, I'll pull this for now, but... > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD (1): > ARM: at91: at91sam9n12: move external irq declatation to DT This one is not a fix. While OK this time, please stick to only sending true fixes for 3.10 from here on out. -Olof
On 10:11 Fri 24 May , Olof Johansson wrote: > Hi, > > I'll pull this for now, but... > > > > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD (1): > > ARM: at91: at91sam9n12: move external irq declatation to DT > > This one is not a fix. While OK this time, please stick to only > sending true fixes for 3.10 from here on out. it's as you must specify them via DT, the C code is not event use in case of DT I should have put fix in the commit Best Regards, J. > > > -Olof > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> wrote: > On 10:11 Fri 24 May , Olof Johansson wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'll pull this for now, but... >> >> >> > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD (1): >> > ARM: at91: at91sam9n12: move external irq declatation to DT >> >> This one is not a fix. While OK this time, please stick to only >> sending true fixes for 3.10 from here on out. > > it's as you must specify them via DT, the C code is not event use in case of > DT > I should have put fix in the commit > I don't understand. -Olof
On 10:25 Fri 24 May , Olof Johansson wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> wrote: > > On 10:11 Fri 24 May , Olof Johansson wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'll pull this for now, but... > >> > >> > >> > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD (1): > >> > ARM: at91: at91sam9n12: move external irq declatation to DT > >> > >> This one is not a fix. While OK this time, please stick to only > >> sending true fixes for 3.10 from here on out. > > > > it's as you must specify them via DT, the C code is not event use in case of > > DT > > I should have put fix in the commit > > > > I don't understand. for DT SoC you must use dt to descrive the external irq on at91 now the sam9n12 (dt-only soc) was not converted when we did it this commit fix it Best Regards, J.
Arnd, Olof, Second AT91 fixes pull-request for 3.10-rc. The PMC definition fix is the most important of this batch. Thanks, best regards, The following changes since commit b7a8ca5173ef9aa55fa039d7c216426ff0b25a12: ARM: at91: rm9200 fix time support (2013-05-15 12:37:45 +0200) are available in the git repository at: git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-fixes for you to fetch changes up to 144ea15e4fefbee14a7dcb05c7cd0822fda3ebf6: ARM: at91/sama5: fix incorrect PMC pcr div definition (2013-05-24 10:53:51 +0200) ---------------------------------------------------------------- One definition fix that can lead to mis-clock some AT91 peripherals on SAMA5. Two DT related fixes. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Boris BREZILLON (1): ARM: at91/dt: fix macb pinctrl_macb_rmii_mii_alt definition Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD (1): ARM: at91: at91sam9n12: move external irq declatation to DT Josh Wu (1): ARM: at91/sama5: fix incorrect PMC pcr div definition arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9260.dtsi | 2 +- arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9n12.dtsi | 1 + arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9n12.c | 6 ------ arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91_pmc.h | 6 +++--- 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)