| Message ID | 1365146271-6220-1-git-send-email-hutao@cn.fujitsu.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
Il 05/04/2013 09:17, Hu Tao ha scritto: > pvpanic device is used to notify host(qemu) when guest panic happens. > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com> > --- > > No change from v16. qemu patches at: > > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-04/msg01028.html Ping. The QEMU parts will be committed shortly. Paolo
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 06:00:09PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 05/04/2013 09:17, Hu Tao ha scritto: > > pvpanic device is used to notify host(qemu) when guest panic happens. > > > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> > > Signed-off-by: Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com> > > --- > > > > No change from v16. qemu patches at: > > > > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-04/msg01028.html > > Ping. The QEMU parts will be committed shortly. Thanks. I pushed this patch to SeaBIOS head. -Kevin
On 04/05/13 09:17, Hu Tao wrote: > + Method(RDPT, 0, NotSerialized) { > + Store(PEPT, Local0) > + Return (Local0) > + } > + > + Method(WRPT, 1, NotSerialized) { > + Store(Arg0, PEPT) > + } Please excuse my asking, I haven't been following this -- who's supposed to call these methods? The latest guest kernel patch I managed to find ([PATCH v7] kvm: notify host when the guest is panicked -- probably obsolete by now) appears to do a direct outl(). Thanks, Laszlo
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:21:54AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 04/05/13 09:17, Hu Tao wrote: > > > + Method(RDPT, 0, NotSerialized) { > > + Store(PEPT, Local0) > > + Return (Local0) > > + } > > + > > + Method(WRPT, 1, NotSerialized) { > > + Store(Arg0, PEPT) > > + } > > Please excuse my asking, I haven't been following this -- who's supposed > to call these methods? The latest guest kernel patch I managed to find > ([PATCH v7] kvm: notify host when the guest is panicked -- probably > obsolete by now) appears to do a direct outl(). An old version calls WRPT but is buggy, so you see the outl version. This patch is in seabios before the outl version. If you think these methods are needless, feel free to send a patch.
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 03:27:39PM +0800, Hu Tao wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:21:54AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > > On 04/05/13 09:17, Hu Tao wrote: > > > > > + Method(RDPT, 0, NotSerialized) { > > > + Store(PEPT, Local0) > > > + Return (Local0) > > > + } > > > + > > > + Method(WRPT, 1, NotSerialized) { > > > + Store(Arg0, PEPT) > > > + } > > > > Please excuse my asking, I haven't been following this -- who's supposed > > to call these methods? The latest guest kernel patch I managed to find > > ([PATCH v7] kvm: notify host when the guest is panicked -- probably > > obsolete by now) appears to do a direct outl(). > > An old version calls WRPT but is buggy, so you see the outl version. > This patch is in seabios before the outl version. If you think these > methods are needless, feel free to send a patch. I mean v19 by outl verson. Sorry for confusing.
On 05/04/13 09:17, Hu Tao wrote: > pvpanic device is used to notify host(qemu) when guest panic happens. > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com> Another question: are you planning to provide libvirt support? Currently I see the guest as paused after a crash. Since there is a crashed state in libvirt it might make sense to use that. Christian
On 05/15/13 09:27, Hu Tao wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:21:54AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> On 04/05/13 09:17, Hu Tao wrote: >> >>> + Method(RDPT, 0, NotSerialized) { >>> + Store(PEPT, Local0) >>> + Return (Local0) >>> + } >>> + >>> + Method(WRPT, 1, NotSerialized) { >>> + Store(Arg0, PEPT) >>> + } >> >> Please excuse my asking, I haven't been following this -- who's supposed >> to call these methods? The latest guest kernel patch I managed to find >> ([PATCH v7] kvm: notify host when the guest is panicked -- probably >> obsolete by now) appears to do a direct outl(). > > An old version calls WRPT but is buggy, so you see the outl version. > This patch is in seabios before the outl version. If you think these > methods are needless, feel free to send a patch. Oh no, that's not what I meant! I'm just rounding up backport candidates :) Thanks! Laszlo
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:32:40AM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 05/04/13 09:17, Hu Tao wrote: > > pvpanic device is used to notify host(qemu) when guest panic happens. > > > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> > > Signed-off-by: Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com> > > Another question: are you planning to provide libvirt support? Currently > I see the guest as paused after a crash. Since there is a crashed state in > libvirt it might make sense to use that. Yep, patch for libvirt is in progress.
Il 15/05/2013 18:25, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto: > (Not sure why the CC list has grown this huge, but I'm adding Drew for > good mesaure.) > > On 05/15/13 09:27, Hu Tao wrote: >> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:21:54AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >>> On 04/05/13 09:17, Hu Tao wrote: >>> >>>> + Method(RDPT, 0, NotSerialized) { >>>> + Store(PEPT, Local0) >>>> + Return (Local0) >>>> + } >>>> + >>>> + Method(WRPT, 1, NotSerialized) { >>>> + Store(Arg0, PEPT) >>>> + } >>> >>> Please excuse my asking, I haven't been following this -- who's supposed >>> to call these methods? The latest guest kernel patch I managed to find >>> ([PATCH v7] kvm: notify host when the guest is panicked -- probably >>> obsolete by now) appears to do a direct outl(). >> >> An old version calls WRPT but is buggy, so you see the outl version. >> This patch is in seabios before the outl version. If you think these >> methods are needless, feel free to send a patch. > > After Drew located the guest kernel commit for me, > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=8b10acd7 > > I can see this SeaBIOS patch *is* necessary -- even though the RDPT / > WRPT methods are not used for port access, the port number itself is > available from ACPI (\_SB.PCI0.ISA.PEVT._CRS, identified by the > "QEMU0001" HID) to the kernel. > > Hu, can you (and are you willing to) relicense this commit (seabios > commit e9725dd7) under the 2-clause BSDL so I can port it to OVMF? > > (Actually I'm somewhat confused because the first S-o-b is from Paolo. > Since I share an employer with Paolo, getting permission from Paolo > would be either quite easy or even unnecessary. Anyway it's better to ask!) I and Hu did half of the patch each. :) But I think it's simpler to avoid OVMF and wait for the time when QEMU will produce the ACPI tables. Paolo
(Not sure why the CC list has grown this huge, but I'm adding Drew for good mesaure.) On 05/15/13 09:27, Hu Tao wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:21:54AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> On 04/05/13 09:17, Hu Tao wrote: >> >>> + Method(RDPT, 0, NotSerialized) { >>> + Store(PEPT, Local0) >>> + Return (Local0) >>> + } >>> + >>> + Method(WRPT, 1, NotSerialized) { >>> + Store(Arg0, PEPT) >>> + } >> >> Please excuse my asking, I haven't been following this -- who's supposed >> to call these methods? The latest guest kernel patch I managed to find >> ([PATCH v7] kvm: notify host when the guest is panicked -- probably >> obsolete by now) appears to do a direct outl(). > > An old version calls WRPT but is buggy, so you see the outl version. > This patch is in seabios before the outl version. If you think these > methods are needless, feel free to send a patch. After Drew located the guest kernel commit for me, http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=8b10acd7 I can see this SeaBIOS patch *is* necessary -- even though the RDPT / WRPT methods are not used for port access, the port number itself is available from ACPI (\_SB.PCI0.ISA.PEVT._CRS, identified by the "QEMU0001" HID) to the kernel. Hu, can you (and are you willing to) relicense this commit (seabios commit e9725dd7) under the 2-clause BSDL so I can port it to OVMF? (Actually I'm somewhat confused because the first S-o-b is from Paolo. Since I share an employer with Paolo, getting permission from Paolo would be either quite easy or even unnecessary. Anyway it's better to ask!) Thanks, Laszlo
On 05/15/13 18:25, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 15/05/2013 18:25, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto: >> (Not sure why the CC list has grown this huge, but I'm adding Drew for >> good mesaure.) >> >> On 05/15/13 09:27, Hu Tao wrote: >>> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:21:54AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >>>> On 04/05/13 09:17, Hu Tao wrote: >>>> >>>>> + Method(RDPT, 0, NotSerialized) { >>>>> + Store(PEPT, Local0) >>>>> + Return (Local0) >>>>> + } >>>>> + >>>>> + Method(WRPT, 1, NotSerialized) { >>>>> + Store(Arg0, PEPT) >>>>> + } >>>> >>>> Please excuse my asking, I haven't been following this -- who's supposed >>>> to call these methods? The latest guest kernel patch I managed to find >>>> ([PATCH v7] kvm: notify host when the guest is panicked -- probably >>>> obsolete by now) appears to do a direct outl(). >>> >>> An old version calls WRPT but is buggy, so you see the outl version. >>> This patch is in seabios before the outl version. If you think these >>> methods are needless, feel free to send a patch. >> >> After Drew located the guest kernel commit for me, >> >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=8b10acd7 >> >> I can see this SeaBIOS patch *is* necessary -- even though the RDPT / >> WRPT methods are not used for port access, the port number itself is >> available from ACPI (\_SB.PCI0.ISA.PEVT._CRS, identified by the >> "QEMU0001" HID) to the kernel. >> >> Hu, can you (and are you willing to) relicense this commit (seabios >> commit e9725dd7) under the 2-clause BSDL so I can port it to OVMF? >> >> (Actually I'm somewhat confused because the first S-o-b is from Paolo. >> Since I share an employer with Paolo, getting permission from Paolo >> would be either quite easy or even unnecessary. Anyway it's better to ask!) > > I and Hu did half of the patch each. :) > > But I think it's simpler to avoid OVMF and wait for the time when QEMU > will produce the ACPI tables. That's fine by me; thanks. Laszlo
diff --git a/src/acpi.c b/src/acpi.c index bc4d8ea..fe504f0 100644 --- a/src/acpi.c +++ b/src/acpi.c @@ -534,6 +534,9 @@ build_ssdt(void) ssdt_ptr[acpi_pci64_valid[0]] = 0; } + int pvpanic_port = romfile_loadint("etc/pvpanic-port", 0x0); + *(u16 *)(ssdt_ptr + *ssdt_isa_pest) = pvpanic_port; + ssdt_ptr += sizeof(ssdp_misc_aml); // build Scope(_SB_) header diff --git a/src/ssdt-misc.dsl b/src/ssdt-misc.dsl index 679422b..acc850e 100644 --- a/src/ssdt-misc.dsl +++ b/src/ssdt-misc.dsl @@ -55,4 +55,50 @@ DefinitionBlock ("ssdt-misc.aml", "SSDT", 0x01, "BXPC", "BXSSDTSUSP", 0x1) Zero /* reserved */ }) } + + External(\_SB.PCI0, DeviceObj) + External(\_SB.PCI0.ISA, DeviceObj) + + Scope(\_SB.PCI0.ISA) { + Device(PEVT) { + Name(_HID, "QEMU0001") + /* PEST will be patched to be Zero if no such device */ + ACPI_EXTRACT_NAME_WORD_CONST ssdt_isa_pest + Name(PEST, 0xFFFF) + OperationRegion(PEOR, SystemIO, PEST, 0x01) + Field(PEOR, ByteAcc, NoLock, Preserve) { + PEPT, 8, + } + + Method(_STA, 0, NotSerialized) { + Store(PEST, Local0) + If (LEqual(Local0, Zero)) { + Return (0x00) + } Else { + Return (0x0F) + } + } + + Method(RDPT, 0, NotSerialized) { + Store(PEPT, Local0) + Return (Local0) + } + + Method(WRPT, 1, NotSerialized) { + Store(Arg0, PEPT) + } + + Name(_CRS, ResourceTemplate() { + IO(Decode16, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01, 0x01, IO) + }) + + CreateWordField(_CRS, IO._MIN, IOMN) + CreateWordField(_CRS, IO._MAX, IOMX) + + Method(_INI, 0, NotSerialized) { + Store(PEST, IOMN) + Store(PEST, IOMX) + } + } + } }