| Message ID | CACRpkdYeWi2cx2weXao9=2f78eM0_J=gK-8o6gKjcG7pjYFAxA@mail.gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On Friday 03 May 2013, Linus Walleij wrote: > Hi ARM SoC folks, > > here are two ux500 fixes for the v3.10 series, please pull > them in. Since -rc1 is not out this is based on Torvald's > HEAD from yesterday. We try hard to avoid doing bug fixes on top of random HEADs. Can you send these on top of the minimum set of branches? Arnd
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > On Friday 03 May 2013, Linus Walleij wrote: >> Hi ARM SoC folks, >> >> here are two ux500 fixes for the v3.10 series, please pull >> them in. Since -rc1 is not out this is based on Torvald's >> HEAD from yesterday. > > We try hard to avoid doing bug fixes on top of random HEADs. > Can you send these on top of the minimum set of branches? I think I'll just wait for -rc1. It's not *that* urgent, just wanted to clean my desk. Yours, Linus Walleij
On Friday 03 May 2013 22:43:10 Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > > On Friday 03 May 2013, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> Hi ARM SoC folks, > >> > >> here are two ux500 fixes for the v3.10 series, please pull > >> them in. Since -rc1 is not out this is based on Torvald's > >> HEAD from yesterday. > > > > We try hard to avoid doing bug fixes on top of random HEADs. > > Can you send these on top of the minimum set of branches? > > I think I'll just wait for -rc1. > > It's not *that* urgent, just wanted to clean my desk. Ok, sounds good. Arnd
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 10:43:10PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > > On Friday 03 May 2013, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> Hi ARM SoC folks, > >> > >> here are two ux500 fixes for the v3.10 series, please pull > >> them in. Since -rc1 is not out this is based on Torvald's > >> HEAD from yesterday. > > > > We try hard to avoid doing bug fixes on top of random HEADs. > > Can you send these on top of the minimum set of branches? > > I think I'll just wait for -rc1. > > It's not *that* urgent, just wanted to clean my desk. I've got a branch started at a non-rc for fixes right now, since we want some of them in before the first -rc. So I'll cherry-pick these over while I'm at it. -Olof
Hi ARM SoC folks, here are two ux500 fixes for the v3.10 series, please pull them in. Since -rc1 is not out this is based on Torvald's HEAD from yesterday. Yours, Linus Walleij The following changes since commit ce857229e0c3adc211944a13a5579ef84fd7b4af: ipc: fix GETALL/IPC_RM race for sysv semaphores (2013-05-02 19:51:31 -0700) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-stericsson.git tags/ux500-fixes-for-v3.10-1 for you to fetch changes up to 9b7a2104e7e5dd02210ac26f5dc488ceb29778f7: ARM: ux500: Rid ignored return value of regulator_enable() compiler warning (2013-05-03 10:27:12 +0200) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Two ux500 fixes for the v3.10 series: - SoC ID fix - Fix errorpath for proximity regulator ---------------------------------------------------------------- Fabio Baltieri (1): ARM: ux500: read the correct soc_id number Lee Jones (1): ARM: ux500: Rid ignored return value of regulator_enable() compiler warning arch/arm/mach-ux500/board-mop500.c | 4 ++-- arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)