Message ID | 20130409111349.GA14821@redhat.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On 04/09/2013 05:13 AM, Marek Polacek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 11:45:04AM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote: >>> Alternatively, we can bump the minimum of that param, as usual ;) >> >> Let's do that and bump it to 1, my understanding is that 0 and 1 are >> equivalent for this param. > > Alright. So ok to apply this one (trunk/4.8)? > > 2013-04-09 Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com> > > PR tree-optimization/48762 > * params.def (PARAM_MAX_CSE_INSNS): Increase the minimum > value to 1. OK. Jeff
--- gcc/params.def.mp 2013-04-09 12:52:07.838278693 +0200 +++ gcc/params.def 2013-04-09 12:52:28.705349278 +0200 @@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ DEFPARAM(PARAM_MAX_GOTO_DUPLICATION_INSN DEFPARAM(PARAM_MAX_CSE_PATH_LENGTH, "max-cse-path-length", "The maximum length of path considered in cse", - 10, 0, 0) + 10, 1, 0) DEFPARAM(PARAM_MAX_CSE_INSNS, "max-cse-insns", "The maximum instructions CSE process before flushing",