Message ID | 20130307043859.GA11944@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 12:38:59PM +0800, Lee Jones wrote: > The following changes since commit 6dbe51c251a327e012439c4772097a13df43c5b8: > > Linux 3.9-rc1 (2013-03-03 15:11:05 -0800) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.linaro.org/people/ljones/linux-3.0-ux500.git for-mfd-and-power Pulled, thanks a lot! Anton
Hi Lee, On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 12:38:59PM +0800, Lee Jones wrote: > The following changes since commit 6dbe51c251a327e012439c4772097a13df43c5b8: > > Linux 3.9-rc1 (2013-03-03 15:11:05 -0800) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.linaro.org/people/ljones/linux-3.0-ux500.git for-mfd-and-power I was expecting to get an MFD only branch (Basically what your for-mfd branch looks like, and then the for-mfd-and-power one to be based on the mfd only with the power patches applied on top of it. Now, I have to pull the power patches as well, which is no big deal but not ideal neither. Anyway, I pulled this branch into mfd-next, with a tiny conflict. Cheers, Samuel.
Hi Sam, > > The following changes since commit 6dbe51c251a327e012439c4772097a13df43c5b8: > > > > Linux 3.9-rc1 (2013-03-03 15:11:05 -0800) > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > git://git.linaro.org/people/ljones/linux-3.0-ux500.git for-mfd-and-power > I was expecting to get an MFD only branch (Basically what your for-mfd branch > looks like, and then the for-mfd-and-power one to be based on the mfd only > with the power patches applied on top of it. > Now, I have to pull the power patches as well, which is no big deal but not > ideal neither. Sorry Sam, I guess I understood you differently: "I can Ack the MFD parts, they look good to me. And then you can take the whole thing through your tree, but I'd prefer you to do so by pulling the branch Lee prepared for us. I want to avoid conflicts this way." When you said you wanted the "whole thing" to go through Anton's Tree, I thought that's what you meant? > Anyway, I pulled this branch into mfd-next, with a tiny conflict. Okay, that's good.
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 10:33:03AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > The following changes since commit 6dbe51c251a327e012439c4772097a13df43c5b8: > > > > > > Linux 3.9-rc1 (2013-03-03 15:11:05 -0800) > > > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > > > git://git.linaro.org/people/ljones/linux-3.0-ux500.git for-mfd-and-power > > I was expecting to get an MFD only branch (Basically what your for-mfd branch > > looks like, and then the for-mfd-and-power one to be based on the mfd only > > with the power patches applied on top of it. > > Now, I have to pull the power patches as well, which is no big deal but not > > ideal neither. > > Sorry Sam, I guess I understood you differently: > > "I can Ack the MFD parts, they look good to me. And then you can take > the whole thing through your tree, but I'd prefer you to do so by > pulling the branch Lee prepared for us. I want to avoid conflicts this > way." I realize this was not very clear from me, sorry. I meant I'm fine with Anton taking the whole thing, but by pulling from what is your current for-mfd-and-power branch. Anton did that and that's all good. Now, to prevent being flamed to death by Linus, I need to carry the MFD patches from this branch as well, and that should have come from a common for-mfd branch. Basically, what I had in mind: - You create a for-mfd branch with all the MFD patches need for the power patches to be applied properly. - You create a for-mfd-and-power branch, where you first merge your for-mfd branch and then apply the power patches. - Anton pulls from for-mfd-and-power. - I pull from for-mfd. - Anton and me carry the exact same set of MFD patches and regardless of who Linus pulls from first, it should work fine. That should still work from your for-mfd-and-power branch, just slightly less clean imo, as I will carry power patches I really don't need. Cheers, Samuel.