Message ID | 1358274002-6042-1-git-send-email-jengelh@inai.de |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Headers | show |
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 07:20:00PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > With this, iptables-1.4.17a (current git state) is tested to compile > and, to the degree covered by this patchset, to function under > Linux 2.4.27/glibc-2.3.2/Debian-3.1. > > === > The following changes since commit 983196ceb4d3bb7b6d3cf6da18bb6d5a5eafb347: > > doc: document the -4 and -6 options (2013-01-07 02:26:16 +0100) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.inai.de/iptables old-linux > > for you to fetch changes up to 1071ec54e6d7af406fe34afea1ce2c3e49ee1914: > > parser: workaround glibc-2.3.2 bug 358 (2013-01-15 19:16:55 +0100) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Jan Engelhardt (2): > build: fix libiptc build failure on old linux-glibc-devel headers > parser: workaround glibc-2.3.2 bug 358 Helping users is a noble thing from your side. However, that glibc branch [1] and that debian release [2] are not maintained anymore. [1] http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release [2] http://www.debian.org/releases/sarge/ Sorry, I'm not taking this. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Friday 2013-01-18 01:44, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: >On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 07:20:00PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> >> With this, iptables-1.4.17a (current git state) is tested to compile >> and, to the degree covered by this patchset, to function under >> Linux 2.4.27/glibc-2.3.2/Debian-3.1. > >Helping users is a noble thing from your side. However, that glibc >branch [1] and that debian release [2] are not maintained anymore. I kinda thought so. Was fun to look at it though. So, what is the minimum {kernel, userspace} configuration that we should require from users and which to put into INSTALL? Do we still care about 2.4.x? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 02:29:43AM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: [...] > So, what is the minimum {kernel, userspace} configuration that > we should require from users and which to put into INSTALL? > Do we still care about 2.4.x? As long as it is maintained, 2.4.x matters. Same thing with maintained third party library dependencies. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Friday 2013-01-18 03:06, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: >On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 02:29:43AM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >[...] >> So, what is the minimum {kernel, userspace} configuration that >> we should require from users and which to put into INSTALL? >> Do we still care about 2.4.x? > >As long as it is maintained, 2.4.x matters. Same thing with maintained >third party library dependencies. > Then the first patch should be applied. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html