[net-next,09/15] e1000e: resolve checkpatch PREFER_PR_LEVEL warning

From: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>

WARNING: Prefer netdev_info(netdev, ... then dev_info(dev, ...
then pr_info(...  to printk(KERN_INFO ...

Signed-off-by: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 02:23 -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> WARNING: Prefer netdev_info(netdev, ... then dev_info(dev, ...
> then pr_info(...  to printk(KERN_INFO ...
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
[]
> @@ -4300,9 +4300,8 @@ static void e1000_print_link_info(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
>  	u32 ctrl = er32(CTRL);
>  
>  	/* Link status message must follow this format for user tools */
> -	printk(KERN_INFO "e1000e: %s NIC Link is Up %d Mbps %s Duplex, Flow Control: %s\n",
> -		adapter->netdev->name,
> -		adapter->link_speed,
> +	pr_info("e1000e: %s NIC Link is Up %d Mbps %s Duplex, Flow Control: %s\n",
> +		adapter->netdev->name, adapter->link_speed,

Don't these changes break a user-space tool?

If not, please remove the comment above the pr_info()s
and remove the unnecessary e1000e: prefixes.

> @@ -4521,8 +4520,8 @@ static void e1000_watchdog_task(struct work_struct *work)
[]
>  			/* Link status message must follow this format */
> -			printk(KERN_INFO "e1000e: %s NIC Link is Down\n",
> -			       adapter->netdev->name);
> +			pr_info("e1000e: %s NIC Link is Down\n",
> +				adapter->netdev->name);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Perches [mailto:joe@perches.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 9:04 AM
> To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T
> Cc: davem@davemloft.net; Allan, Bruce W; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
> gospo@redhat.com; sassmann@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [net-next 09/15] e1000e: resolve checkpatch PREFER_PR_LEVEL
> warning
> 
> On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 02:23 -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > WARNING: Prefer netdev_info(netdev, ... then dev_info(dev, ...
> > then pr_info(...  to printk(KERN_INFO ...
> []
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> []
> > @@ -4300,9 +4300,8 @@ static void e1000_print_link_info(struct
> e1000_adapter *adapter)
> >  	u32 ctrl = er32(CTRL);
> >
> >  	/* Link status message must follow this format for user tools */
> > -	printk(KERN_INFO "e1000e: %s NIC Link is Up %d Mbps %s Duplex,
> Flow Control: %s\n",
> > -		adapter->netdev->name,
> > -		adapter->link_speed,
> > +	pr_info("e1000e: %s NIC Link is Up %d Mbps %s Duplex, Flow
> Control: %s\n",
> > +		adapter->netdev->name, adapter->link_speed,
> 
> Don't these changes break a user-space tool?
> 
> If not, please remove the comment above the pr_info()s
> and remove the unnecessary e1000e: prefixes.
> 
> > @@ -4521,8 +4520,8 @@ static void e1000_watchdog_task(struct
> work_struct *work)
> []
> >  			/* Link status message must follow this format */
> > -			printk(KERN_INFO "e1000e: %s NIC Link is Down\n",
> > -			       adapter->netdev->name);
> > +			pr_info("e1000e: %s NIC Link is Down\n",
> > +				adapter->netdev->name);
> 

Hmm, I'm not sure how that got past our testing even after I asked to check for
redundant instances of "e1000e".  This patch can be dropped and I will submit an
updated one but it will still have the "must follow this format for user tools" comment
since the user tools key off of "e1000e: <iface> NIC Link is ..." text.

Thanks,
Bruce.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html