[6/9] ARM: dt: tegra114: Add new SoC base, Tegra 114 SoC

Initial support for Tegra 114 SoC. This is expected to be included in
the board DTS files, Tegra 114 SoC based evaluation board family.

Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@nvidia.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114.dtsi |   89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114.dtsi

On 20/12/12 09:44, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Initial support for Tegra 114 SoC. This is expected to be included in
> the board DTS files, Tegra 114 SoC based evaluation board family.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@nvidia.com>

You definitely need to add some cpu nodes here, or get someone to merge
the NR_CPUS=0 patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/31/131

;-)

> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114.dtsi |   89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 89 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114.dtsi
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..a5b7330
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
> +/include/ "skeleton.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> +	compatible = "nvidia,tegra114";
> +	interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> +
> +	gic: interrupt-controller {
> +		compatible = "arm,cortex-a15-gic", "arm,cortex-a9-gic";
> +		reg = <0x50041000 0x1000
> +		       0x50042000 0x1000>;

If this is indeed an A15 GIC, how about adding the GICH and GICV
regions, as well as the VGIC maintenance interrupt?

> +		interrupt-controller;
> +		#interrupt-cells = <3>;
> +	};
> +
> +	timer@60005000 {
> +		compatible = "nvidia,tegra114-timer", "nvidia,tegra20-timer";
> +		reg = <0x60005000 0x400>;
> +		interrupts = <0 0 0x04
> +			      0 1 0x04
> +			      0 41 0x04
> +			      0 42 0x04
> +			      0 121 0x04
> +			      0 122 0x04>;
> +	};
> +
> +	serial@70006000 {
> +		compatible = "nvidia,tegra114-uart", "nvidia,tegra20-uart";
> +		reg = <0x70006000 0x40>;
> +		reg-shift = <2>;
> +		interrupts = <0 36 0x04>;
> +		status = "disabled";
> +	};
> +
> +	serial@70006040 {
> +		compatible = "nvidia,tegra114-uart", "nvidia,tegra20-uart";
> +		reg = <0x70006040 0x40>;
> +		reg-shift = <2>;
> +		interrupts = <0 37 0x04>;
> +		status = "disabled";
> +	};
> +
> +	serial@70006200 {
> +		compatible = "nvidia,tegra114-uart", "nvidia,tegra20-uart";
> +		reg = <0x70006200 0x100>;
> +		reg-shift = <2>;
> +		interrupts = <0 46 0x04>;
> +		status = "disabled";
> +	};
> +
> +	serial@70006300 {
> +		compatible = "nvidia,tegra114-uart", "nvidia,tegra20-uart";
> +		reg = <0x70006300 0x100>;
> +		reg-shift = <2>;
> +		interrupts = <0 90 0x04>;
> +		status = "disabled";
> +	};
> +
> +	serial@70006400 {
> +		compatible = "nvidia,tegra114-uart", "nvidia,tegra20-uart";
> +		reg = <0x70006400 0x100>;
> +		reg-shift = <2>;
> +		interrupts = <0 91 0x04>;
> +		status = "disabled";
> +	};
> +
> +	rtc {
> +		compatible = "nvidia,tegra114-rtc", "nvidia,tegra20-rtc";
> +		reg = <0x7000e000 0x100>;
> +		interrupts = <0 2 0x04>;
> +	};
> +
> +	pmc {
> +		compatible = "nvidia,tegra114-pmc", "nvidia,tegra20-pmc";
> +		reg = <0x7000e400 0x400>;
> +	};
> +
> +	tsc {
> +		compatible = "nvidia,tegra114-tsc";
> +		reg = <0x700f0000 0x20000>;
> +	};
> +
> +	timer {
> +		compatible = "arm,armv7-timer";
> +		interrupts = <1 13 0xf08>,
> +			     <1 14 0xf08>,
> +			     <1 11 0xf08>,
> +			     <1 10 0xf08>;
> +	};
> +};
>

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:44:04AM +0200, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Initial support for Tegra 114 SoC. This is expected to be included in
> the board DTS files, Tegra 114 SoC based evaluation board family.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@nvidia.com>

Hi,

I think it could be a good idea to start documenting the cpu configuration in
the device tree on some of these larger platforms as well, i.e. include a cpus/
hierarchy. Would you mind adding those, please?

It would give you the flexibility of switching over to using device
tree to probe the number of cpus in case the platform grows yet another
way to figure out the number of cores in the future, without having to
update the device-trees at that time. :)


-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Hi Olof,

Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote @ Sat, 29 Dec 2012 07:39:13 +0100:

> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:44:04AM +0200, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> > Initial support for Tegra 114 SoC. This is expected to be included in
> > the board DTS files, Tegra 114 SoC based evaluation board family.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@nvidia.com>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I think it could be a good idea to start documenting the cpu configuration in
> the device tree on some of these larger platforms as well, i.e. include a cpus/
> hierarchy. Would you mind adding those, please?

Ok, I'll.

> It would give you the flexibility of switching over to using device
> tree to probe the number of cpus in case the platform grows yet another
> way to figure out the number of cores in the future, without having to
> update the device-trees at that time. :)
> 
> 
> -Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html