Message ID | 20121115175835.652C43E197F@localhost (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted, archived |
Commit | 51e0eaf98d48dc6fc385d1aee9e208afe3ce0cf1 |
Headers | show |
Am Donnerstag, 15. November 2012, 17:58:35 schrieb Grant Likely:
> Anyway, here is a real patch.
Thanks a lot, Grant!
Your patch improves the situation significantly. However, it is still not
entirely fixed:
irq: irq-93==>hwirq-0x5d mapping failed: -22
There are a lot less error messages than before, though. Please see attached
log.
Best regards,
Dennis Schridde
Hello all of you! Am Donnerstag, 15. November 2012, 17:58:35 schrieb Grant Likely: > Umm, no. Some suggestions were made so I assumed you'd try those. > > Anyway, here is a real patch. Try this: > > - for_each_node(node) { > + for_each_online_node(node) { I am running my 3.8.6 kernel with your patch now (will this be merged anytime soon?), but I still get a bunch of irq mapping failed messages. Examples: [ 0.490734] irq: irq-93==>hwirq-0x5d mapping failed: -22 [ 22.016469] irq: no irq domain found for /axon@10000000000/plb5/pciex- utl@a00000a000004000 ! Please see attached log. In addition I see a weird issue: All programs run on CPU 0 (cores 0+1) only, while CPU 1 (cores 2+3) is always idle. Could this have anything to do with the IRQ issue, or shall I start a new thread/report for that? Best regards, Dennis
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/pmu.c index 59c1a16..348a27b 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/pmu.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/pmu.c @@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ static int __init cbe_init_pm_irq(void) unsigned int irq; int rc, node; - for_each_node(node) { + for_each_online_node(node) { irq = irq_create_mapping(NULL, IIC_IRQ_IOEX_PMI | (node << IIC_IRQ_NODE_SHIFT)); if (irq == NO_IRQ) {