Message ID | 20121121162702.GB32567@kam.mff.cuni.cz |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
> ... I believe I posted a patch?
Yes: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg01799.html
I have found another fall out: I have some avatars of the polyhedron tests
where the REAL(8) have been replaced with REAL(10). Some of them are now
Should I open a new PR for that?
Cheers,
Dominique
My mailer has eaten a line in my previous mail. One should read: I have found another fall out: I have some avatars of the polyhedron tests where the REAL(8) have been replaced with REAL(10). Some of them are now ~50% slower with the new value of max-completely-peeled-insns. Should I open a new PR for that? Sorry for the noise. Dominique
Index: reassoc_4.f =================================================================== --- reassoc_4.f (revision 193698) +++ reassoc_4.f (working copy) @@ -1,7 +1,5 @@ ! { dg-do compile } -! { dg-options "-O3 -ffast-math -fdump-tree-reassoc1" } -! { dg-additional-options "--param max-completely-peel-times=16" { target spu-*-* } } -! { dg-additional-options "--param max-completely-peeled-insns=400" { target s390*-*-* } } +! { dg-options "-O3 -ffast-math -fdump-tree-reassoc1 --param max-completely-peel-times=16 --param max-completely-peeled-insns=400" } subroutine anisonl(w,vo,anisox,s,ii1,jj1,weight) integer ii1,jj1,i1,iii1,j1,jjj1,k1,l1,m1,n1 real*8 w(3,3),vo(3,3),anisox(3,3,3,3),s(60,60),weight