Message ID | 50AA5ED5.8090901@atmel.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Hi Nicolas, On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> wrote: > Arnd, Olof, > > Here is another "fixes" pull request for AT91. It enables the sd/mmc driver > for Device Tree enabled platforms. Those patches where part of a series that > was split in two for reaching upstream: the MMC part is already in Linus' tree > and this is the arm-soc part. > I have placed these patches on top of the fixes that you already have for AT91. What regressions do these fixes resolve? It looks more like they are DT-enablement patches to me, and thus 3.8 material, not 3.7. I'll be happy to queue them up in next/dt though. Thanks, -Olof
On 11/19/2012 05:52 PM, Olof Johansson : > Hi Nicolas, > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> wrote: >> Arnd, Olof, >> >> Here is another "fixes" pull request for AT91. It enables the sd/mmc driver >> for Device Tree enabled platforms. Those patches where part of a series that >> was split in two for reaching upstream: the MMC part is already in Linus' tree >> and this is the arm-soc part. >> I have placed these patches on top of the fixes that you already have for AT91. > > What regressions do these fixes resolve? > > It looks more like they are DT-enablement patches to me, and thus 3.8 > material, not 3.7. I'll be happy to queue them up in next/dt though. Hi Olof, You are right, it does not strictly fixes a regression and we were late for including these patches which are around since end of July... I still sent this pull-request to enable more people to use device tree on AT91 for the upcoming release. If you do not take it for 3.7, maybe we will have to queue these patches on top of our AT91 pinctrl work (on Linus Walleij side), so, you do need to queue this one for the moment... Best regards,
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> wrote: > If you do not take it for 3.7, maybe we will have to queue these patches > on top of our AT91 pinctrl work (on Linus Walleij side), so, you do need > to queue this one for the moment... Tell me what the outcome is, if I should merge some stuff on top of my pinctrl tree just send me the patches... Yours, Linus Walleij
On 19:47 Tue 20 Nov , Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> wrote: > > > If you do not take it for 3.7, maybe we will have to queue these patches > > on top of our AT91 pinctrl work (on Linus Walleij side), so, you do need > > to queue this one for the moment... > > Tell me what the outcome is, if I should merge some stuff on top > of my pinctrl tree just send me the patches... I send you the pull with few patch for pinctrl Best Regards, J.