Message ID | alpine.LNX.2.00.1208211303130.2054@ghan.fvgr |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > One question: in general we are using the term "command-line option". > You are introducing two uses of "flag", and the two existing uses of > that are also in the Fortran section. Is this Fortran terminology or > would it be fine to make this more consistent? Well, "flag" is GCC teminology (see "man gcc"), though it seems to be only used for the -f* options while I (mis)used it here for -W*. I think it is better to use the more common term "command-line option". Tobias
Index: changes.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.8/changes.html,v retrieving revision 1.55 diff -u -3 -p -r1.55 changes.html --- changes.html 11 Nov 2012 09:22:18 -0000 1.55 +++ changes.html 12 Nov 2012 15:17:53 -0000 @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ B b(42); // OK warnings are issued when comparing <code>REAL</code> or <code>COMPLEX</code> types for equality and inequality; consider replacing <code>a == b</code> by <code>abs(a−b) < eps</code> with a suitable - <code>eps</code>. The <code>-Wcompare-reals</code> flag is enabled by + <code>eps</code>. <code>-Wcompare-reals</code> is enabled by <code>-Wextra</code>.</li> <li>The <a