| Message ID | 20121016040152.GQ1218@drongo |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On 10/16/2012 06:01 AM, Paul Mackerras wrote: > A new ioctl, KVM_PPC_GET_HTAB_FD, returns a file descriptor. Reads on > this fd return the contents of the HPT (hashed page table), writes > create and/or remove entries in the HPT. There is a new capability, > KVM_CAP_PPC_HTAB_FD, to indicate the presence of the ioctl. The ioctl > takes an argument structure with the index of the first HPT entry to > read out and a set of flags. The flags indicate whether the user is > intending to read or write the HPT, and whether to return all entries > or only the "bolted" entries (those with the bolted bit, 0x10, set in > the first doubleword). > > This is intended for use in implementing qemu's savevm/loadvm and for > live migration. Therefore, on reads, the first pass returns information > about all HPTEs (or all bolted HPTEs). When the first pass reaches the > end of the HPT, it returns from the read. Subsequent reads only return > information about HPTEs that have changed since they were last read. > A read that finds no changed HPTEs in the HPT following where the last > read finished will return 0 bytes. Copying people with interest in migration. > +4.78 KVM_PPC_GET_HTAB_FD > + > +Capability: KVM_CAP_PPC_HTAB_FD > +Architectures: powerpc > +Type: vm ioctl > +Parameters: Pointer to struct kvm_get_htab_fd (in) > +Returns: file descriptor number (>= 0) on success, -1 on error > + > +This returns a file descriptor that can be used either to read out the > +entries in the guest's hashed page table (HPT), or to write entries to > +initialize the HPT. The returned fd can only be written to if the > +KVM_GET_HTAB_WRITE bit is set in the flags field of the argument, and > +can only be read if that bit is clear. The argument struct looks like > +this: > + > +/* For KVM_PPC_GET_HTAB_FD */ > +struct kvm_get_htab_fd { > + __u64 flags; > + __u64 start_index; > +}; > + > +/* Values for kvm_get_htab_fd.flags */ > +#define KVM_GET_HTAB_BOLTED_ONLY ((__u64)0x1) > +#define KVM_GET_HTAB_WRITE ((__u64)0x2) > + > +The `start_index' field gives the index in the HPT of the entry at > +which to start reading. It is ignored when writing. > + > +Reads on the fd will initially supply information about all > +"interesting" HPT entries. Interesting entries are those with the > +bolted bit set, if the KVM_GET_HTAB_BOLTED_ONLY bit is set, otherwise > +all entries. When the end of the HPT is reached, the read() will > +return. What happens if the read buffer is smaller than the HPT size? What happens if the read buffer size is not a multiple of entry size? Does/should the fd support O_NONBLOCK and poll? (=waiting for an entry to change). > If read() is called again on the fd, it will start again from > +the beginning of the HPT, but will only return HPT entries that have > +changed since they were last read. > + > +Data read or written is structured as a header (8 bytes) followed by a > +series of valid HPT entries (16 bytes) each. The header indicates how > +many valid HPT entries there are and how many invalid entries follow > +the valid entries. The invalid entries are not represented explicitly > +in the stream. The header format is: > + > +struct kvm_get_htab_header { > + __u32 index; > + __u16 n_valid; > + __u16 n_invalid; > +}; This structure forces the kernel to return entries sequentially. Will this block changing the data structure in the future? Or is the hardware spec sufficiently strict that such changes are not realistic? > + > +Writes to the fd create HPT entries starting at the index given in the > +header; first `n_valid' valid entries with contents from the data > +written, then `n_invalid' invalid entries, invalidating any previously > +valid entries found. This scheme is a clever, original, and very interesting approach to live migration. That doesn't necessarily mean a NAK, we should see if it makes sense for other migration APIs as well (we currently have difficulties migrating very large/wide guests). What is the typical number of entries in the HPT? Do you have estimates of the change rate? Suppose new hardware arrives that supports nesting HPTs, so that kvm is no longer synchronously aware of the guest HPT (similar to how NPT/EPT made kvm unaware of guest virtual->physical translations on x86). How will we deal with that? But I guess this will be a non-guest-transparent and non-userspace-transparent change, unlike NPT/EPT, so a userspace ABI addition will be needed anyway).
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:06:58PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 10/16/2012 06:01 AM, Paul Mackerras wrote: > > +4.78 KVM_PPC_GET_HTAB_FD > > + > > +Capability: KVM_CAP_PPC_HTAB_FD > > +Architectures: powerpc > > +Type: vm ioctl > > +Parameters: Pointer to struct kvm_get_htab_fd (in) > > +Returns: file descriptor number (>= 0) on success, -1 on error > > + > > +This returns a file descriptor that can be used either to read out the > > +entries in the guest's hashed page table (HPT), or to write entries to > > +initialize the HPT. The returned fd can only be written to if the > > +KVM_GET_HTAB_WRITE bit is set in the flags field of the argument, and > > +can only be read if that bit is clear. The argument struct looks like > > +this: > > + > > +/* For KVM_PPC_GET_HTAB_FD */ > > +struct kvm_get_htab_fd { > > + __u64 flags; > > + __u64 start_index; > > +}; > > + > > +/* Values for kvm_get_htab_fd.flags */ > > +#define KVM_GET_HTAB_BOLTED_ONLY ((__u64)0x1) > > +#define KVM_GET_HTAB_WRITE ((__u64)0x2) > > + > > +The `start_index' field gives the index in the HPT of the entry at > > +which to start reading. It is ignored when writing. > > + > > +Reads on the fd will initially supply information about all > > +"interesting" HPT entries. Interesting entries are those with the > > +bolted bit set, if the KVM_GET_HTAB_BOLTED_ONLY bit is set, otherwise > > +all entries. When the end of the HPT is reached, the read() will > > +return. > > What happens if the read buffer is smaller than the HPT size? That's fine; the read stops when it has filled the buffer and a subsequent read will continue from where the previous one finished. > What happens if the read buffer size is not a multiple of entry size? Then we don't use the last few bytes of the buffer. The read() call returns the number of bytes that were filled in, of course. In any case, the header size is 8 bytes and the HPT entry size is 16 bytes, so the number of bytes filled in won't necessarily be a multiple of 16 bytes. > Does/should the fd support O_NONBLOCK and poll? (=waiting for an entry > to change). No. > > If read() is called again on the fd, it will start again from > > +the beginning of the HPT, but will only return HPT entries that have > > +changed since they were last read. > > + > > +Data read or written is structured as a header (8 bytes) followed by a > > +series of valid HPT entries (16 bytes) each. The header indicates how > > +many valid HPT entries there are and how many invalid entries follow > > +the valid entries. The invalid entries are not represented explicitly > > +in the stream. The header format is: > > + > > +struct kvm_get_htab_header { > > + __u32 index; > > + __u16 n_valid; > > + __u16 n_invalid; > > +}; > > This structure forces the kernel to return entries sequentially. Will > this block changing the data structure in the future? Or is the > hardware spec sufficiently strict that such changes are not realistic? By "data structure", do you mean the stream format on the file descriptor, or the HPT structure? If we want a new stream format, then we would define a bit in the flags field of struct kvm_get_htab_fd to mean "I want the new stream format". The code fails the ioctl if any unknown flag bits are set, so a new userspace that wants to use the new format could then detect that it is running on an old kernel and fall back to the old format. The HPT entry format is very unlikely to change in size or basic layout (though the architects do redefine some of the bits occasionally). > > + > > +Writes to the fd create HPT entries starting at the index given in the > > +header; first `n_valid' valid entries with contents from the data > > +written, then `n_invalid' invalid entries, invalidating any previously > > +valid entries found. > > This scheme is a clever, original, and very interesting approach to live > migration. That doesn't necessarily mean a NAK, we should see if it > makes sense for other migration APIs as well (we currently have > difficulties migrating very large/wide guests). > > What is the typical number of entries in the HPT? Do you have estimates > of the change rate? Typically the HPT would have about a million entries, i.e. it would be 16MiB in size. The usual guideline is to make it about 1/64 of the maximum amount of RAM the guest could ever have, rounded up to a power of two, although we often run with less, say 1/128 or even 1/256. Because it is a hash table, updates tend to be scattered throughout the whole table, which is another reason why per-page dirty tracking and updates would be pretty inefficient. As for the change rate, it depends on the application of course, but basically every time the guest changes a PTE in its Linux page tables we do the corresponding change to the corresponding HPT entry, so the rate can be quite high. Workloads that do a lot of fork, exit, mmap, exec, etc. have a high rate of HPT updates. > Suppose new hardware arrives that supports nesting HPTs, so that kvm is > no longer synchronously aware of the guest HPT (similar to how NPT/EPT > made kvm unaware of guest virtual->physical translations on x86). How > will we deal with that? But I guess this will be a > non-guest-transparent and non-userspace-transparent change, unlike > NPT/EPT, so a userspace ABI addition will be needed anyway). Nested HPTs or other changes to the MMU architecture would certainly need new guest kernels and new support in KVM. With a nested approach, the guest-side MMU data structures (HPT or whatever) would presumably be in guest memory and thus be handled along with all the other guest memory, while the host-side MMU data structures would not need to be saved, so from the migration point of view that would make it all a lot simpler. Paul. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 10/16/2012 01:58 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote: > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:06:58PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: >> On 10/16/2012 06:01 AM, Paul Mackerras wrote: >> > +4.78 KVM_PPC_GET_HTAB_FD >> > + >> > +Capability: KVM_CAP_PPC_HTAB_FD >> > +Architectures: powerpc >> > +Type: vm ioctl >> > +Parameters: Pointer to struct kvm_get_htab_fd (in) >> > +Returns: file descriptor number (>= 0) on success, -1 on error >> > + >> > +This returns a file descriptor that can be used either to read out the >> > +entries in the guest's hashed page table (HPT), or to write entries to >> > +initialize the HPT. The returned fd can only be written to if the >> > +KVM_GET_HTAB_WRITE bit is set in the flags field of the argument, and >> > +can only be read if that bit is clear. The argument struct looks like >> > +this: >> > + >> > +/* For KVM_PPC_GET_HTAB_FD */ >> > +struct kvm_get_htab_fd { >> > + __u64 flags; >> > + __u64 start_index; >> > +}; >> > + >> > +/* Values for kvm_get_htab_fd.flags */ >> > +#define KVM_GET_HTAB_BOLTED_ONLY ((__u64)0x1) >> > +#define KVM_GET_HTAB_WRITE ((__u64)0x2) >> > + >> > +The `start_index' field gives the index in the HPT of the entry at >> > +which to start reading. It is ignored when writing. >> > + >> > +Reads on the fd will initially supply information about all >> > +"interesting" HPT entries. Interesting entries are those with the >> > +bolted bit set, if the KVM_GET_HTAB_BOLTED_ONLY bit is set, otherwise >> > +all entries. When the end of the HPT is reached, the read() will >> > +return. >> >> What happens if the read buffer is smaller than the HPT size? > > That's fine; the read stops when it has filled the buffer and a > subsequent read will continue from where the previous one finished. > >> What happens if the read buffer size is not a multiple of entry size? > > Then we don't use the last few bytes of the buffer. The read() call > returns the number of bytes that were filled in, of course. In any > case, the header size is 8 bytes and the HPT entry size is 16 bytes, > so the number of bytes filled in won't necessarily be a multiple of 16 > bytes. That's sane and expected, but it should be documented. > >> Does/should the fd support O_NONBLOCK and poll? (=waiting for an entry >> to change). > > No. This forces userspace to dedicate a thread for the HPT. > >> > If read() is called again on the fd, it will start again from >> > +the beginning of the HPT, but will only return HPT entries that have >> > +changed since they were last read. >> > + >> > +Data read or written is structured as a header (8 bytes) followed by a >> > +series of valid HPT entries (16 bytes) each. The header indicates how >> > +many valid HPT entries there are and how many invalid entries follow >> > +the valid entries. The invalid entries are not represented explicitly >> > +in the stream. The header format is: >> > + >> > +struct kvm_get_htab_header { >> > + __u32 index; >> > + __u16 n_valid; >> > + __u16 n_invalid; >> > +}; >> >> This structure forces the kernel to return entries sequentially. Will >> this block changing the data structure in the future? Or is the >> hardware spec sufficiently strict that such changes are not realistic? > > By "data structure", do you mean the stream format on the file > descriptor, or the HPT structure? If we want a new stream format, > then we would define a bit in the flags field of struct > kvm_get_htab_fd to mean "I want the new stream format". The code > fails the ioctl if any unknown flag bits are set, so a new userspace > that wants to use the new format could then detect that it is running > on an old kernel and fall back to the old format. > > The HPT entry format is very unlikely to change in size or basic > layout (though the architects do redefine some of the bits > occasionally). I meant the internal data structure that holds HPT entries. I guess I don't understand the index. Do we expect changes to be in contiguous ranges? And invalid entries to be contiguous as well? That doesn't fit with how hash tables work. Does the index represent the position of the entry within the table, or something else? > >> > + >> > +Writes to the fd create HPT entries starting at the index given in the >> > +header; first `n_valid' valid entries with contents from the data >> > +written, then `n_invalid' invalid entries, invalidating any previously >> > +valid entries found. >> >> This scheme is a clever, original, and very interesting approach to live >> migration. That doesn't necessarily mean a NAK, we should see if it >> makes sense for other migration APIs as well (we currently have >> difficulties migrating very large/wide guests). >> >> What is the typical number of entries in the HPT? Do you have estimates >> of the change rate? > > Typically the HPT would have about a million entries, i.e. it would be > 16MiB in size. The usual guideline is to make it about 1/64 of the > maximum amount of RAM the guest could ever have, rounded up to a power > of two, although we often run with less, say 1/128 or even 1/256. 16MiB is transferred in ~0.15 sec on GbE, much faster with 10GbE. Does it warrant a live migration protocol? > Because it is a hash table, updates tend to be scattered throughout > the whole table, which is another reason why per-page dirty tracking > and updates would be pretty inefficient. This suggests a stream format that includes the index in every entry. > > As for the change rate, it depends on the application of course, but > basically every time the guest changes a PTE in its Linux page tables > we do the corresponding change to the corresponding HPT entry, so the > rate can be quite high. Workloads that do a lot of fork, exit, mmap, > exec, etc. have a high rate of HPT updates. If the rate is high enough, then there's no point in a live update. > >> Suppose new hardware arrives that supports nesting HPTs, so that kvm is >> no longer synchronously aware of the guest HPT (similar to how NPT/EPT >> made kvm unaware of guest virtual->physical translations on x86). How >> will we deal with that? But I guess this will be a >> non-guest-transparent and non-userspace-transparent change, unlike >> NPT/EPT, so a userspace ABI addition will be needed anyway). > > Nested HPTs or other changes to the MMU architecture would certainly > need new guest kernels and new support in KVM. With a nested > approach, the guest-side MMU data structures (HPT or whatever) would > presumably be in guest memory and thus be handled along with all the > other guest memory, while the host-side MMU data structures would not > need to be saved, so from the migration point of view that would make > it all a lot simpler. Yeah.
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> writes: > On 10/16/2012 01:58 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:06:58PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: >>> On 10/16/2012 06:01 AM, Paul Mackerras wrote: >>> > +4.78 KVM_PPC_GET_HTAB_FD >>> > + >>> > +Capability: KVM_CAP_PPC_HTAB_FD >>> > +Architectures: powerpc >>> > +Type: vm ioctl >>> > +Parameters: Pointer to struct kvm_get_htab_fd (in) >>> > +Returns: file descriptor number (>= 0) on success, -1 on error >>> > + >>> > +This returns a file descriptor that can be used either to read out the >>> > +entries in the guest's hashed page table (HPT), or to write entries to >>> > +initialize the HPT. The returned fd can only be written to if the >>> > +KVM_GET_HTAB_WRITE bit is set in the flags field of the argument, and >>> > +can only be read if that bit is clear. The argument struct looks like >>> > +this: >>> > + >>> > +/* For KVM_PPC_GET_HTAB_FD */ >>> > +struct kvm_get_htab_fd { >>> > + __u64 flags; >>> > + __u64 start_index; >>> > +}; >>> > + >>> > +/* Values for kvm_get_htab_fd.flags */ >>> > +#define KVM_GET_HTAB_BOLTED_ONLY ((__u64)0x1) >>> > +#define KVM_GET_HTAB_WRITE ((__u64)0x2) >>> > + >>> > +The `start_index' field gives the index in the HPT of the entry at >>> > +which to start reading. It is ignored when writing. >>> > + >>> > +Reads on the fd will initially supply information about all >>> > +"interesting" HPT entries. Interesting entries are those with the >>> > +bolted bit set, if the KVM_GET_HTAB_BOLTED_ONLY bit is set, otherwise >>> > +all entries. When the end of the HPT is reached, the read() will >>> > +return. >>> >>> What happens if the read buffer is smaller than the HPT size? >> >> That's fine; the read stops when it has filled the buffer and a >> subsequent read will continue from where the previous one finished. >> >>> What happens if the read buffer size is not a multiple of entry size? >> >> Then we don't use the last few bytes of the buffer. The read() call >> returns the number of bytes that were filled in, of course. In any >> case, the header size is 8 bytes and the HPT entry size is 16 bytes, >> so the number of bytes filled in won't necessarily be a multiple of 16 >> bytes. > > That's sane and expected, but it should be documented. > >> >>> Does/should the fd support O_NONBLOCK and poll? (=waiting for an entry >>> to change). >> >> No. > > This forces userspace to dedicate a thread for the HPT. If no changes are available, does read return a size > 0? I don't think it's necessary to support polling. The kernel should always be able to respond to userspace here. The only catch is whether to return !0 read sizes when there are no changes. At any case, I can't see why a dedicated thread is needed. QEMU is going to poll HPT based on how fast we can send data over the wire. >>> > If read() is called again on the fd, it will start again from >>> > +the beginning of the HPT, but will only return HPT entries that have >>> > +changed since they were last read. >>> > + >>> > +Data read or written is structured as a header (8 bytes) followed by a >>> > +series of valid HPT entries (16 bytes) each. The header indicates how >>> > +many valid HPT entries there are and how many invalid entries follow >>> > +the valid entries. The invalid entries are not represented explicitly >>> > +in the stream. The header format is: >>> > + >>> > +struct kvm_get_htab_header { >>> > + __u32 index; >>> > + __u16 n_valid; >>> > + __u16 n_invalid; >>> > +}; >>> >>> This structure forces the kernel to return entries sequentially. Will >>> this block changing the data structure in the future? Or is the >>> hardware spec sufficiently strict that such changes are not realistic? >> >> By "data structure", do you mean the stream format on the file >> descriptor, or the HPT structure? If we want a new stream format, >> then we would define a bit in the flags field of struct >> kvm_get_htab_fd to mean "I want the new stream format". The code >> fails the ioctl if any unknown flag bits are set, so a new userspace >> that wants to use the new format could then detect that it is running >> on an old kernel and fall back to the old format. >> >> The HPT entry format is very unlikely to change in size or basic >> layout (though the architects do redefine some of the bits >> occasionally). > > I meant the internal data structure that holds HPT entries. > > I guess I don't understand the index. Do we expect changes to be in > contiguous ranges? And invalid entries to be contiguous as well? That > doesn't fit with how hash tables work. Does the index represent the > position of the entry within the table, or something else? > > >> >>> > + >>> > +Writes to the fd create HPT entries starting at the index given in the >>> > +header; first `n_valid' valid entries with contents from the data >>> > +written, then `n_invalid' invalid entries, invalidating any previously >>> > +valid entries found. >>> >>> This scheme is a clever, original, and very interesting approach to live >>> migration. That doesn't necessarily mean a NAK, we should see if it >>> makes sense for other migration APIs as well (we currently have >>> difficulties migrating very large/wide guests). >>> >>> What is the typical number of entries in the HPT? Do you have estimates >>> of the change rate? >> >> Typically the HPT would have about a million entries, i.e. it would be >> 16MiB in size. The usual guideline is to make it about 1/64 of the >> maximum amount of RAM the guest could ever have, rounded up to a power >> of two, although we often run with less, say 1/128 or even 1/256. > > 16MiB is transferred in ~0.15 sec on GbE, much faster with 10GbE. Does > it warrant a live migration protocol? 0.15 sec == 150ms. The typical downtime window is 30ms. So yeah, I think it does. >> Because it is a hash table, updates tend to be scattered throughout >> the whole table, which is another reason why per-page dirty tracking >> and updates would be pretty inefficient. > > This suggests a stream format that includes the index in every entry. > >> >> As for the change rate, it depends on the application of course, but >> basically every time the guest changes a PTE in its Linux page tables >> we do the corresponding change to the corresponding HPT entry, so the >> rate can be quite high. Workloads that do a lot of fork, exit, mmap, >> exec, etc. have a high rate of HPT updates. > > If the rate is high enough, then there's no point in a live update. Do we have practical data here? Regards, Anthony Liguori > >> >>> Suppose new hardware arrives that supports nesting HPTs, so that kvm is >>> no longer synchronously aware of the guest HPT (similar to how NPT/EPT >>> made kvm unaware of guest virtual->physical translations on x86). How >>> will we deal with that? But I guess this will be a >>> non-guest-transparent and non-userspace-transparent change, unlike >>> NPT/EPT, so a userspace ABI addition will be needed anyway). >> >> Nested HPTs or other changes to the MMU architecture would certainly >> need new guest kernels and new support in KVM. With a nested >> approach, the guest-side MMU data structures (HPT or whatever) would >> presumably be in guest memory and thus be handled along with all the >> other guest memory, while the host-side MMU data structures would not >> need to be saved, so from the migration point of view that would make >> it all a lot simpler. > > Yeah. > > > -- > error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 03:06:33PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 10/16/2012 01:58 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:06:58PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> Does/should the fd support O_NONBLOCK and poll? (=waiting for an entry > >> to change). > > > > No. > > This forces userspace to dedicate a thread for the HPT. Why? Reads never block in any case. > >> > If read() is called again on the fd, it will start again from > >> > +the beginning of the HPT, but will only return HPT entries that have > >> > +changed since they were last read. > >> > + > >> > +Data read or written is structured as a header (8 bytes) followed by a > >> > +series of valid HPT entries (16 bytes) each. The header indicates how > >> > +many valid HPT entries there are and how many invalid entries follow > >> > +the valid entries. The invalid entries are not represented explicitly > >> > +in the stream. The header format is: > >> > + > >> > +struct kvm_get_htab_header { > >> > + __u32 index; > >> > + __u16 n_valid; > >> > + __u16 n_invalid; > >> > +}; > >> > >> This structure forces the kernel to return entries sequentially. Will > >> this block changing the data structure in the future? Or is the > >> hardware spec sufficiently strict that such changes are not realistic? > > > > By "data structure", do you mean the stream format on the file > > descriptor, or the HPT structure? If we want a new stream format, > > then we would define a bit in the flags field of struct > > kvm_get_htab_fd to mean "I want the new stream format". The code > > fails the ioctl if any unknown flag bits are set, so a new userspace > > that wants to use the new format could then detect that it is running > > on an old kernel and fall back to the old format. > > > > The HPT entry format is very unlikely to change in size or basic > > layout (though the architects do redefine some of the bits > > occasionally). > > I meant the internal data structure that holds HPT entries. Oh, that's just an array, and userspace already knows how big it is. > I guess I don't understand the index. Do we expect changes to be in > contiguous ranges? And invalid entries to be contiguous as well? That > doesn't fit with how hash tables work. Does the index represent the > position of the entry within the table, or something else? The index is just the position in the array. Typically, in each group of 8 it will tend to be the low-numbered ones that are valid, since creating an entry usually uses the first empty slot. So I expect that on the first pass, most of the records will represent 8 HPTEs. On subsequent passes, probably most records will represent a single HPTE. > >> > + > >> > +Writes to the fd create HPT entries starting at the index given in the > >> > +header; first `n_valid' valid entries with contents from the data > >> > +written, then `n_invalid' invalid entries, invalidating any previously > >> > +valid entries found. > >> > >> This scheme is a clever, original, and very interesting approach to live > >> migration. That doesn't necessarily mean a NAK, we should see if it > >> makes sense for other migration APIs as well (we currently have > >> difficulties migrating very large/wide guests). > >> > >> What is the typical number of entries in the HPT? Do you have estimates > >> of the change rate? > > > > Typically the HPT would have about a million entries, i.e. it would be > > 16MiB in size. The usual guideline is to make it about 1/64 of the > > maximum amount of RAM the guest could ever have, rounded up to a power > > of two, although we often run with less, say 1/128 or even 1/256. > > 16MiB is transferred in ~0.15 sec on GbE, much faster with 10GbE. Does > it warrant a live migration protocol? The qemu people I talked to seemed to think so. > > Because it is a hash table, updates tend to be scattered throughout > > the whole table, which is another reason why per-page dirty tracking > > and updates would be pretty inefficient. > > This suggests a stream format that includes the index in every entry. That would amount to dropping the n_valid and n_invalid fields from the current header format. That would be less efficient for the initial pass (assuming we achieve an average n_valid of at least 2 on the initial pass), and probably less efficient for the incremental updates, since a newly-invalidated entry would have to be represented as 16 zero bytes rather than just an 8-byte header with n_valid=0 and n_invalid=1. I'm assuming here that the initial pass would omit invalid entries. > > > > As for the change rate, it depends on the application of course, but > > basically every time the guest changes a PTE in its Linux page tables > > we do the corresponding change to the corresponding HPT entry, so the > > rate can be quite high. Workloads that do a lot of fork, exit, mmap, > > exec, etc. have a high rate of HPT updates. > > If the rate is high enough, then there's no point in a live update. True, but doesn't that argument apply to memory pages as well? Paul. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 10/16/2012 10:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >> This forces userspace to dedicate a thread for the HPT. > > If no changes are available, does read return a size > 0? I don't think > it's necessary to support polling. The kernel should always be able to > respond to userspace here. The only catch is whether to return !0 read > sizes when there are no changes. > > At any case, I can't see why a dedicated thread is needed. QEMU is > going to poll HPT based on how fast we can send data over the wire. That means spinning if we can send the data faster than we dirty it. But we do that anyway for memory.
On 10/16/2012 11:52 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote: > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 03:06:33PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: >> On 10/16/2012 01:58 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote: >> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:06:58PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: >> >> Does/should the fd support O_NONBLOCK and poll? (=waiting for an entry >> >> to change). >> > >> > No. >> >> This forces userspace to dedicate a thread for the HPT. > > Why? Reads never block in any case. Ok. This parallels KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG. >> >> I meant the internal data structure that holds HPT entries. > > Oh, that's just an array, and userspace already knows how big it is. > >> I guess I don't understand the index. Do we expect changes to be in >> contiguous ranges? And invalid entries to be contiguous as well? That >> doesn't fit with how hash tables work. Does the index represent the >> position of the entry within the table, or something else? > > The index is just the position in the array. Typically, in each group > of 8 it will tend to be the low-numbered ones that are valid, since > creating an entry usually uses the first empty slot. So I expect that > on the first pass, most of the records will represent 8 HPTEs. On > subsequent passes, probably most records will represent a single HPTE. So it's a form of RLE compression. Ok. >> >> 16MiB is transferred in ~0.15 sec on GbE, much faster with 10GbE. Does >> it warrant a live migration protocol? > > The qemu people I talked to seemed to think so. > >> > Because it is a hash table, updates tend to be scattered throughout >> > the whole table, which is another reason why per-page dirty tracking >> > and updates would be pretty inefficient. >> >> This suggests a stream format that includes the index in every entry. > > That would amount to dropping the n_valid and n_invalid fields from > the current header format. That would be less efficient for the > initial pass (assuming we achieve an average n_valid of at least 2 on > the initial pass), and probably less efficient for the incremental > updates, since a newly-invalidated entry would have to be represented > as 16 zero bytes rather than just an 8-byte header with n_valid=0 and > n_invalid=1. I'm assuming here that the initial pass would omit > invalid entries. I agree. But let's have some measurements to make sure. > >> > >> > As for the change rate, it depends on the application of course, but >> > basically every time the guest changes a PTE in its Linux page tables >> > we do the corresponding change to the corresponding HPT entry, so the >> > rate can be quite high. Workloads that do a lot of fork, exit, mmap, >> > exec, etc. have a high rate of HPT updates. >> >> If the rate is high enough, then there's no point in a live update. > > True, but doesn't that argument apply to memory pages as well? In some cases it does. The question is what happens in practice. If you migrate a kernel build, how many entries are sent in the guest stopped phase?
diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt index 4258180..8df3e53 100644 --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt @@ -2071,6 +2071,59 @@ KVM_S390_INT_EXTERNAL_CALL (vcpu) - sigp external call; source cpu in parm Note that the vcpu ioctl is asynchronous to vcpu execution. +4.78 KVM_PPC_GET_HTAB_FD + +Capability: KVM_CAP_PPC_HTAB_FD +Architectures: powerpc +Type: vm ioctl +Parameters: Pointer to struct kvm_get_htab_fd (in) +Returns: file descriptor number (>= 0) on success, -1 on error + +This returns a file descriptor that can be used either to read out the +entries in the guest's hashed page table (HPT), or to write entries to +initialize the HPT. The returned fd can only be written to if the +KVM_GET_HTAB_WRITE bit is set in the flags field of the argument, and +can only be read if that bit is clear. The argument struct looks like +this: + +/* For KVM_PPC_GET_HTAB_FD */ +struct kvm_get_htab_fd { + __u64 flags; + __u64 start_index; +}; + +/* Values for kvm_get_htab_fd.flags */ +#define KVM_GET_HTAB_BOLTED_ONLY ((__u64)0x1) +#define KVM_GET_HTAB_WRITE ((__u64)0x2) + +The `start_index' field gives the index in the HPT of the entry at +which to start reading. It is ignored when writing. + +Reads on the fd will initially supply information about all +"interesting" HPT entries. Interesting entries are those with the +bolted bit set, if the KVM_GET_HTAB_BOLTED_ONLY bit is set, otherwise +all entries. When the end of the HPT is reached, the read() will +return. If read() is called again on the fd, it will start again from +the beginning of the HPT, but will only return HPT entries that have +changed since they were last read. + +Data read or written is structured as a header (8 bytes) followed by a +series of valid HPT entries (16 bytes) each. The header indicates how +many valid HPT entries there are and how many invalid entries follow +the valid entries. The invalid entries are not represented explicitly +in the stream. The header format is: + +struct kvm_get_htab_header { + __u32 index; + __u16 n_valid; + __u16 n_invalid; +}; + +Writes to the fd create HPT entries starting at the index given in the +header; first `n_valid' valid entries with contents from the data +written, then `n_invalid' invalid entries, invalidating any previously +valid entries found. + 5. The kvm_run structure ------------------------ diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm.h index b89ae4d..6518e38 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm.h @@ -331,6 +331,30 @@ struct kvm_book3e_206_tlb_params { __u32 reserved[8]; }; +/* For KVM_PPC_GET_HTAB_FD */ +struct kvm_get_htab_fd { + __u64 flags; + __u64 start_index; +}; + +/* Values for kvm_get_htab_fd.flags */ +#define KVM_GET_HTAB_BOLTED_ONLY ((__u64)0x1) +#define KVM_GET_HTAB_WRITE ((__u64)0x2) + +/* + * Data read on the file descriptor is formatted as a series of + * records, each consisting of a header followed by a series of + * `n_valid' HPTEs (16 bytes each), which are all valid. Following + * those valid HPTEs there are `n_invalid' invalid HPTEs, which + * are not represented explicitly in the stream. The same format + * is used for writing. + */ +struct kvm_get_htab_header { + __u32 index; + __u16 n_valid; + __u16 n_invalid; +}; + #define KVM_REG_PPC_HIOR (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x1) #define KVM_REG_PPC_IAC1 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x2) #define KVM_REG_PPC_IAC2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x3) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_64.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_64.h index 4ca4f25..dc0a78d 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_64.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_64.h @@ -243,4 +243,22 @@ static inline bool slot_is_aligned(struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot, return !(memslot->base_gfn & mask) && !(memslot->npages & mask); } +static inline unsigned long slb_pgsize_encoding(unsigned long psize) +{ + unsigned long senc = 0; + + if (psize > 0x1000) { + senc = SLB_VSID_L; + if (psize == 0x10000) + senc |= SLB_VSID_LP_01; + } + return senc; +} + +static inline int is_vrma_hpte(unsigned long hpte_v) +{ + return (hpte_v & ~0xffffffUL) == + (HPTE_V_1TB_SEG | (VRMA_VSID << (40 - 16))); +} + #endif /* __ASM_KVM_BOOK3S_64_H__ */ diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h index 609cca3..1ca31e9 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h @@ -164,6 +164,8 @@ extern void kvmppc_bookehv_exit(void); extern int kvmppc_prepare_to_enter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); +extern int kvm_vm_ioctl_get_htab_fd(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_get_htab_fd *); + /* * Cuts out inst bits with ordering according to spec. * That means the leftmost bit is zero. All given bits are included. diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c index 351f2ac..3c47f61 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ #include <linux/hugetlb.h> #include <linux/vmalloc.h> #include <linux/srcu.h> +#include <linux/anon_inodes.h> +#include <linux/file.h> #include <asm/tlbflush.h> #include <asm/kvm_ppc.h> @@ -1145,6 +1147,348 @@ void kvmppc_unpin_guest_page(struct kvm *kvm, void *va) put_page(page); } +/* + * Functions for reading and writing the hash table via reads and + * writes on a file descriptor. + * + * Reads return the guest view of the hash table, which has to be + * pieced together from the real hash table and the guest_rpte + * values in the revmap array. + * + * On writes, each HPTE written is considered in turn, and if it + * is valid, it is written to the HPT as if an H_ENTER with the + * exact flag set was done. When the invalid count is non-zero + * in the header written to the stream, the kernel will make + * sure that that many HPTEs are invalid, and invalidate them + * if not. + */ + +struct kvm_htab_ctx { + unsigned long index; + unsigned long flags; + struct kvm *kvm; + int first_pass; +}; + +#define HPTE_SIZE (2 * sizeof(unsigned long)) + +static long record_hpte(unsigned long flags, unsigned long *hptp, + unsigned long *hpte, struct revmap_entry *revp, + int want_valid, int first_pass) +{ + unsigned long v, r; + int ok = 1; + int valid, dirty; + + /* Unmodified entries are uninteresting except on the first pass */ + dirty = !!(revp->guest_rpte & HPTE_GR_MODIFIED); + if (!first_pass && !dirty) + return 0; + + valid = 0; + if (hptp[0] & (HPTE_V_VALID | HPTE_V_ABSENT)) { + valid = 1; + if ((flags & KVM_GET_HTAB_BOLTED_ONLY) && + !(hptp[0] & HPTE_V_BOLTED)) + valid = 0; + } + if (valid != want_valid) + return 0; + + v = r = 0; + if (valid || dirty) { + /* lock the HPTE so it's stable and read it */ + preempt_disable(); + while (!try_lock_hpte(hptp, HPTE_V_HVLOCK)) + cpu_relax(); + v = hptp[0]; + if (v & HPTE_V_ABSENT) { + v &= ~HPTE_V_ABSENT; + v |= HPTE_V_VALID; + } + /* re-evaluate valid and dirty from synchronized HPTE value */ + valid = !!(v & HPTE_V_VALID); + if ((flags & KVM_GET_HTAB_BOLTED_ONLY) && !(v & HPTE_V_BOLTED)) + valid = 0; + r = revp->guest_rpte | (hptp[1] & (HPTE_R_R | HPTE_R_C)); + dirty = !!(revp->guest_rpte & HPTE_GR_MODIFIED); + /* only clear modified if this is the right sort of entry */ + if (valid == want_valid && dirty) { + r &= ~HPTE_GR_MODIFIED; + revp->guest_rpte = r; + } + asm volatile(PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER "" : : : "memory"); + hptp[0] &= ~HPTE_V_HVLOCK; + preempt_enable(); + if (!(valid == want_valid && (first_pass || dirty))) + ok = 0; + } + hpte[0] = v; + hpte[1] = r; + return ok; +} + +static ssize_t kvm_htab_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, + size_t count, loff_t *ppos) +{ + struct kvm_htab_ctx *ctx = file->private_data; + struct kvm *kvm = ctx->kvm; + struct kvm_get_htab_header hdr; + unsigned long *hptp; + struct revmap_entry *revp; + unsigned long i, nb, nw; + unsigned long __user *lbuf; + struct kvm_get_htab_header __user *hptr; + unsigned long flags; + int first_pass; + unsigned long hpte[2]; + + if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, buf, count)) + return -EFAULT; + + first_pass = ctx->first_pass; + flags = ctx->flags; + + i = ctx->index; + hptp = (unsigned long *)(kvm->arch.hpt_virt + (i * HPTE_SIZE)); + revp = kvm->arch.revmap + i; + lbuf = (unsigned long __user *)buf; + + nb = 0; + while (nb + sizeof(hdr) + HPTE_SIZE < count) { + /* Initialize header */ + hptr = (struct kvm_get_htab_header __user *)buf; + hdr.index = i; + hdr.n_valid = 0; + hdr.n_invalid = 0; + nw = nb; + nb += sizeof(hdr); + lbuf = (unsigned long __user *)(buf + sizeof(hdr)); + + /* Skip uninteresting entries, i.e. clean on not-first pass */ + if (!first_pass) { + while (i < kvm->arch.hpt_npte && + !(revp->guest_rpte & HPTE_GR_MODIFIED)) { + ++i; + hptp += 2; + ++revp; + } + } + + /* Grab a series of valid entries */ + while (i < kvm->arch.hpt_npte && + hdr.n_valid < 0xffff && + nb + HPTE_SIZE < count && + record_hpte(flags, hptp, hpte, revp, 1, first_pass)) { + /* valid entry, write it out */ + ++hdr.n_valid; + if (__put_user(hpte[0], lbuf) || + __put_user(hpte[1], lbuf + 1)) + return -EFAULT; + nb += HPTE_SIZE; + lbuf += 2; + ++i; + hptp += 2; + ++revp; + } + /* Now skip invalid entries while we can */ + while (i < kvm->arch.hpt_npte && + hdr.n_invalid < 0xffff && + record_hpte(flags, hptp, hpte, revp, 0, first_pass)) { + /* found an invalid entry */ + ++hdr.n_invalid; + ++i; + hptp += 2; + ++revp; + } + + if (hdr.n_valid || hdr.n_invalid) { + /* write back the header */ + if (__copy_to_user(hptr, &hdr, sizeof(hdr))) + return -EFAULT; + nw = nb; + buf = (char __user *)lbuf; + } else { + nb = nw; + } + + /* Check if we've wrapped around the hash table */ + if (i >= kvm->arch.hpt_npte) { + i = 0; + ctx->first_pass = 0; + break; + } + } + + ctx->index = i; + + return nb; +} + +static ssize_t kvm_htab_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, + size_t count, loff_t *ppos) +{ + struct kvm_htab_ctx *ctx = file->private_data; + struct kvm *kvm = ctx->kvm; + struct kvm_get_htab_header hdr; + unsigned long i, j; + unsigned long v, r; + unsigned long __user *lbuf; + unsigned long *hptp; + unsigned long tmp[2]; + ssize_t nb; + long int err, ret; + int rma_setup; + + if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, buf, count)) + return -EFAULT; + + /* lock out vcpus from running while we're doing this */ + mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); + rma_setup = kvm->arch.rma_setup_done; + if (rma_setup) { + kvm->arch.rma_setup_done = 0; /* temporarily */ + /* order rma_setup_done vs. vcpus_running */ + smp_mb(); + if (atomic_read(&kvm->arch.vcpus_running)) { + kvm->arch.rma_setup_done = 1; + mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + return -EBUSY; + } + } + + err = 0; + for (nb = 0; nb + sizeof(hdr) <= count; ) { + err = -EFAULT; + if (__copy_from_user(&hdr, buf, sizeof(hdr))) + break; + + err = 0; + if (nb + hdr.n_valid * HPTE_SIZE > count) + break; + + nb += sizeof(hdr); + buf += sizeof(hdr); + + err = -EINVAL; + i = hdr.index; + if (i >= kvm->arch.hpt_npte || + i + hdr.n_valid + hdr.n_invalid > kvm->arch.hpt_npte) + break; + + hptp = (unsigned long *)(kvm->arch.hpt_virt + (i * HPTE_SIZE)); + lbuf = (unsigned long __user *)buf; + for (j = 0; j < hdr.n_valid; ++j) { + err = -EFAULT; + if (__get_user(v, lbuf) || __get_user(r, lbuf + 1)) + goto out; + err = -EINVAL; + if (!(v & HPTE_V_VALID)) + goto out; + lbuf += 2; + nb += HPTE_SIZE; + + if (hptp[0] & (HPTE_V_VALID | HPTE_V_ABSENT)) + kvmppc_do_h_remove(kvm, 0, i, 0, tmp); + err = -EIO; + ret = kvmppc_virtmode_do_h_enter(kvm, H_EXACT, i, v, r, + tmp); + if (ret != H_SUCCESS) { + pr_err("kvm_htab_write ret %ld i=%ld v=%lx " + "r=%lx\n", ret, i, v, r); + goto out; + } + if (!rma_setup && is_vrma_hpte(v)) { + unsigned long psize = hpte_page_size(v, r); + unsigned long senc = slb_pgsize_encoding(psize); + unsigned long lpcr; + + kvm->arch.vrma_slb_v = senc | SLB_VSID_B_1T | + (VRMA_VSID << SLB_VSID_SHIFT_1T); + lpcr = kvm->arch.lpcr & ~LPCR_VRMASD; + lpcr |= senc << (LPCR_VRMASD_SH - 4); + kvm->arch.lpcr = lpcr; + rma_setup = 1; + } + ++i; + hptp += 2; + } + + for (j = 0; j < hdr.n_invalid; ++j) { + if (hptp[0] & (HPTE_V_VALID | HPTE_V_ABSENT)) + kvmppc_do_h_remove(kvm, 0, i, 0, tmp); + ++i; + hptp += 2; + } + err = 0; + } + + out: + /* Order HPTE updates vs. rma_setup_done */ + smp_wmb(); + kvm->arch.rma_setup_done = rma_setup; + mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + + if (err) + return err; + return nb; +} + +static int kvm_htab_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) +{ + struct kvm_htab_ctx *ctx = filp->private_data; + + filp->private_data = NULL; + if (!(ctx->flags & KVM_GET_HTAB_WRITE)) + atomic_dec(&ctx->kvm->arch.hpte_mod_interest); + kvm_put_kvm(ctx->kvm); + kfree(ctx); + return 0; +} + +static struct file_operations kvm_htab_fops = { + .read = kvm_htab_read, + .write = kvm_htab_write, + .llseek = default_llseek, + .release = kvm_htab_release, +}; + +int kvm_vm_ioctl_get_htab_fd(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_get_htab_fd *ghf) +{ + int ret; + struct kvm_htab_ctx *ctx; + int rwflag; + + /* reject flags we don't recognize */ + if (ghf->flags & ~(KVM_GET_HTAB_BOLTED_ONLY | KVM_GET_HTAB_WRITE)) + return -EINVAL; + ctx = kzalloc(sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ctx) + return -ENOMEM; + kvm_get_kvm(kvm); + ctx->kvm = kvm; + ctx->index = ghf->start_index; + ctx->flags = ghf->flags; + ctx->first_pass = 1; + + rwflag = (ghf->flags & KVM_GET_HTAB_WRITE) ? O_WRONLY : O_RDONLY; + ret = anon_inode_getfd("kvm-htab", &kvm_htab_fops, ctx, rwflag); + if (ret < 0) { + kvm_put_kvm(kvm); + return ret; + } + + if (rwflag == O_RDONLY) { + mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock); + atomic_inc(&kvm->arch.hpte_mod_interest); + /* make sure kvmppc_do_h_enter etc. see the increment */ + synchronize_srcu_expedited(&kvm->srcu); + mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock); + } + + return ret; +} + void kvmppc_mmu_book3s_hv_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { struct kvmppc_mmu *mmu = &vcpu->arch.mmu; diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c index 812764c..df5ae3e 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c @@ -1563,18 +1563,6 @@ out: return r; } -static unsigned long slb_pgsize_encoding(unsigned long psize) -{ - unsigned long senc = 0; - - if (psize > 0x1000) { - senc = SLB_VSID_L; - if (psize == 0x10000) - senc |= SLB_VSID_LP_01; - } - return senc; -} - static void unpin_slot(struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot) { unsigned long *physp; diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c index deb0d59..3aa52d9 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c @@ -353,6 +353,12 @@ int kvm_dev_ioctl_check_extension(long ext) r = 1; #else r = 0; + break; +#endif +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_64_HV + case KVM_CAP_PPC_HTAB_FD: + r = 1; + break; #endif break; case KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS: @@ -934,6 +940,17 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp, r = 0; break; } + + case KVM_PPC_GET_HTAB_FD: { + struct kvm *kvm = filp->private_data; + struct kvm_get_htab_fd ghf; + + r = -EFAULT; + if (copy_from_user(&ghf, argp, sizeof(ghf))) + break; + r = kvm_vm_ioctl_get_htab_fd(kvm, &ghf); + break; + } #endif /* CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_64_HV */ #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64 diff --git a/include/linux/kvm.h b/include/linux/kvm.h index 65ad5c6..f1427c3 100644 --- a/include/linux/kvm.h +++ b/include/linux/kvm.h @@ -630,6 +630,7 @@ struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info { #endif #define KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE 82 #define KVM_CAP_PPC_BOOKE_WATCHDOG 83 +#define KVM_CAP_PPC_HTAB_FD 84 #ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING @@ -855,6 +856,8 @@ struct kvm_s390_ucas_mapping { #define KVM_CREATE_SPAPR_TCE _IOW(KVMIO, 0xa8, struct kvm_create_spapr_tce) /* Available with KVM_CAP_RMA */ #define KVM_ALLOCATE_RMA _IOR(KVMIO, 0xa9, struct kvm_allocate_rma) +/* Available with KVM_CAP_PPC_HTAB_FD */ +#define KVM_PPC_GET_HTAB_FD _IOW(KVMIO, 0xaa, struct kvm_get_htab_fd) /* * ioctls for vcpu fds
A new ioctl, KVM_PPC_GET_HTAB_FD, returns a file descriptor. Reads on this fd return the contents of the HPT (hashed page table), writes create and/or remove entries in the HPT. There is a new capability, KVM_CAP_PPC_HTAB_FD, to indicate the presence of the ioctl. The ioctl takes an argument structure with the index of the first HPT entry to read out and a set of flags. The flags indicate whether the user is intending to read or write the HPT, and whether to return all entries or only the "bolted" entries (those with the bolted bit, 0x10, set in the first doubleword). This is intended for use in implementing qemu's savevm/loadvm and for live migration. Therefore, on reads, the first pass returns information about all HPTEs (or all bolted HPTEs). When the first pass reaches the end of the HPT, it returns from the read. Subsequent reads only return information about HPTEs that have changed since they were last read. A read that finds no changed HPTEs in the HPT following where the last read finished will return 0 bytes. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> --- Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 53 +++++ arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm.h | 24 +++ arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_64.h | 18 ++ arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h | 2 + arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c | 344 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 12 -- arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 17 ++ include/linux/kvm.h | 3 + 8 files changed, 461 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)