| Message ID | 1345472926-21528-2-git-send-email-jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On 20.08.2012, at 16:28, Jens Freimann wrote: > From: Heinz Graalfs <graalfs@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > This adds a more generic infrastructure for handling Service-Call > requests on s390. Currently we only support a small subset of Read > SCP Info directly in target-s390x. This patch provides the base > infrastructure for supporting more commands and moves Read SCP > Info. > In the future we could add additional commands for hotplug, call > home and event handling. > > Signed-off-by: Heinz Graalfs <graalfs@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Jens Freimann <jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > hw/s390x/Makefile.objs | 1 + > hw/s390x/sclp.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > hw/s390x/sclp.h | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > target-s390x/cpu.h | 14 +------ > target-s390x/kvm.c | 5 +-- > target-s390x/op_helper.c | 31 +++----------- > 6 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 hw/s390x/sclp.c > create mode 100644 hw/s390x/sclp.h > > diff --git a/hw/s390x/Makefile.objs b/hw/s390x/Makefile.objs > index dcdcac8..1c14b96 100644 > --- a/hw/s390x/Makefile.objs > +++ b/hw/s390x/Makefile.objs > @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ > obj-y = s390-virtio-bus.o s390-virtio.o > > obj-y := $(addprefix ../,$(obj-y)) > +obj-y += sclp.o > diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..322a0e2 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c > @@ -0,0 +1,107 @@ > +/* > + * SCLP Support > + * > + * Copyright IBM, Corp. 2012 > + * > + * Authors: > + * Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> > + * Heinz Graalfs <graalfs@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > + * > + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or (at your > + * option) any later version. See the COPYING file in the top-level directory. > + * > + */ > + > +#include "cpu.h" > +#include "kvm.h" > + > +#include "sclp.h" > + > +/* Provide information about the configuration, CPUs and storage */ > +static void read_SCP_info(SCCB *sccb) > +{ > + ReadInfo *read_info = (ReadInfo *) sccb; > + int shift = 0; > + > + while ((ram_size >> (20 + shift)) > 65535) { > + shift++; > + } > + read_info->rnmax = cpu_to_be16(ram_size >> (20 + shift)); > + read_info->rnsize = 1 << shift; Any reason we can't just always expose rnmax2 and rnsize2 instead? This way we're quite limited on the amount of RAM we can support, right? > + sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_NORMAL_READ_COMPLETION); > +} > + > +static void sclp_execute(SCCB *sccb, uint64_t code) > +{ > + switch (code) { > + case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO: > + case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO_FORCED: > + read_SCP_info(sccb); > + break; > + default: > + sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND); > + break; > + } > +} > + > +int do_sclp_service_call(uint32_t sccb, uint64_t code) > +{ > + int r = 0; > + SCCB work_sccb; > + > + target_phys_addr_t sccb_len = sizeof(SCCB); > + > + /* > + * we want to work on a private copy of the sccb, to prevent guests > + * from playing dirty tricks by modifying the memory content after > + * the host has checked the values > + */ > + cpu_physical_memory_read(sccb, &work_sccb, sccb_len); > + > + /* Valid sccb sizes */ > + if (be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length) < 8 || sizeof(SCCBHeader) > + be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length) > 4096) { SCCB_SIZE > + r = -PGM_SPECIFICATION; > + goto out; > + } > + > + sclp_execute((SCCB *)&work_sccb, code); > + > + cpu_physical_memory_write(sccb, &work_sccb, > + be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length)); > + > + sclp_service_interrupt(sccb); > + > +out: > + return r; > +} > + > +void sclp_service_interrupt(uint32_t sccb) > +{ > + s390_sclp_extint(sccb & ~3); > +} > + > +/* qemu object creation and initialization functions */ > + > +static void s390_sclp_device_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data) > +{ > + SysBusDeviceClass *dc = SYS_BUS_DEVICE_CLASS(klass); > + > + dc->init = s390_sclp_dev_init; > +} > + > +static TypeInfo s390_sclp_device_info = { > + .name = TYPE_DEVICE_S390_SCLP, > + .parent = TYPE_SYS_BUS_DEVICE, > + .instance_size = sizeof(S390SCLPDevice), > + .class_init = s390_sclp_device_class_init, > + .class_size = sizeof(S390SCLPDeviceClass), > + .abstract = true, > +}; > + > +static void s390_sclp_register_types(void) > +{ > + type_register_static(&s390_sclp_device_info); > +} > + > +type_init(s390_sclp_register_types) > diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.h b/hw/s390x/sclp.h > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..e9ad42b > --- /dev/null > +++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.h > @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ > +/* > + * SCLP Support > + * > + * Copyright IBM, Corp. 2012 > + * > + * Authors: > + * Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> > + * > + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or (at your > + * option) any later version. See the COPYING file in the top-level directory. > + * > + */ > + > +#ifndef HW_S390_SCLP_H > +#define HW_S390_SCLP_H > + > +#include <hw/sysbus.h> > +#include <hw/qdev.h> > + > +/* SCLP command codes */ > +#define SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO 0x00020001 > +#define SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO_FORCED 0x00120001 > + > +/* SCLP response codes */ > +#define SCLP_RC_NORMAL_READ_COMPLETION 0x0010 > +#define SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND 0x01f0 > + > +/* Service Call Control Block (SCCB) and its elements */ > + > +#define SCCB_SIZE 4096 > + > +/* > + * Normally packed structures are not the right thing to do, since all code > + * must take care of endianess. We cant use ldl_phys and friends for two > + * reasons, though: > + * - some of the embedded structures below the SCCB can appear multiple times > + * at different locations, so there is no fixed offset > + * - we work on a private copy of the SCCB, since there are several length > + * fields, that would cause a security nightmare if we allow the guest to > + * alter the structure while we parse it. We cannot use ldl_p and friends > + * either without doing pointer arithmetics > + * So we have to double check that all users of sclp data structures use the > + * right endianess wrappers. > + */ > +typedef struct SCCBHeader { > + uint16_t length; > + uint8_t function_code; > + uint8_t control_mask[3]; > + uint16_t response_code; > +} QEMU_PACKED SCCBHeader; > + > +#define SCCB_DATA_LEN (SCCB_SIZE - sizeof(SCCBHeader)) > + > +typedef struct ReadInfo { > + SCCBHeader h; > + uint16_t rnmax; > + uint8_t rnsize; > +} QEMU_PACKED ReadInfo; > + > +typedef struct SCCB { > + SCCBHeader h; > + char data[SCCB_DATA_LEN]; > + } QEMU_PACKED SCCB; > + > +typedef struct S390SCLPDevice { > + SysBusDevice busdev; > +} S390SCLPDevice; > + > +typedef struct S390SCLPDeviceClass { > + DeviceClass qdev; > + int (*init)(S390SCLPDevice *sdev); > +} S390SCLPDeviceClass; > + > +void sclp_service_interrupt(uint32_t sccb); > + > +#endif > diff --git a/target-s390x/cpu.h b/target-s390x/cpu.h > index 18ac6e3..efd2cda 100644 > --- a/target-s390x/cpu.h > +++ b/target-s390x/cpu.h > @@ -294,6 +294,7 @@ void s390x_tod_timer(void *opaque); > void s390x_cpu_timer(void *opaque); > > int s390_virtio_hypercall(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t mem, uint64_t hypercall); > +int do_sclp_service_call(uint32_t sccb, uint64_t code); > > #ifdef CONFIG_KVM > void kvm_s390_interrupt(CPUS390XState *env, int type, uint32_t code); > @@ -596,17 +597,6 @@ static inline const char *cc_name(int cc_op) > return cc_names[cc_op]; > } > > -/* SCLP PV interface defines */ > -#define SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO 0x00020001 > -#define SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO_FORCED 0x00120001 > - > -#define SCP_LENGTH 0x00 > -#define SCP_FUNCTION_CODE 0x02 > -#define SCP_CONTROL_MASK 0x03 > -#define SCP_RESPONSE_CODE 0x06 > -#define SCP_MEM_CODE 0x08 > -#define SCP_INCREMENT 0x0a > - > typedef struct LowCore > { > /* prefix area: defined by architecture */ > @@ -955,7 +945,7 @@ static inline void ebcdic_put(uint8_t *p, const char *ascii, int len) > void load_psw(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t mask, uint64_t addr); > int mmu_translate(CPUS390XState *env, target_ulong vaddr, int rw, uint64_t asc, > target_ulong *raddr, int *flags); > -int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint32_t sccb, uint64_t code); > +int sclp_service_call(uint32_t sccb, uint64_t code); > uint32_t calc_cc(CPUS390XState *env, uint32_t cc_op, uint64_t src, uint64_t dst, > uint64_t vr); > > diff --git a/target-s390x/kvm.c b/target-s390x/kvm.c > index 07edf93..bcb6b2e 100644 > --- a/target-s390x/kvm.c > +++ b/target-s390x/kvm.c > @@ -60,9 +60,6 @@ > #define SIGP_STORE_STATUS_ADDR 0x0e > #define SIGP_SET_ARCH 0x12 > > -#define SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO 0x00020001 > -#define SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO_FORCED 0x00120001 > - > const KVMCapabilityInfo kvm_arch_required_capabilities[] = { > KVM_CAP_LAST_INFO > }; > @@ -272,7 +269,7 @@ static int kvm_sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, struct kvm_run *run, > sccb = env->regs[ipbh0 & 0xf]; > code = env->regs[(ipbh0 & 0xf0) >> 4]; > > - r = sclp_service_call(env, sccb, code); > + r = sclp_service_call(sccb, code); > if (r < 0) { > enter_pgmcheck(env, -r); > } > diff --git a/target-s390x/op_helper.c b/target-s390x/op_helper.c > index abc35dd..e7bb980 100644 > --- a/target-s390x/op_helper.c > +++ b/target-s390x/op_helper.c > @@ -2363,13 +2363,11 @@ static void program_interrupt(CPUS390XState *env, uint32_t code, int ilc) > } > > /* > + * we handle here the part that belongs to the cpu, e.g. program checks > * ret < 0 indicates program check, ret = 0,1,2,3 -> cc > */ > -int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint32_t sccb, uint64_t code) > +int sclp_service_call(uint32_t sccb, uint64_t code) Why not move the whole thing into sclp.c? The only thing remaining here are a few sanity checks that would just as well work in generic sclp handling code, right? Alex > { > - int r = 0; > - int shift = 0; > - > #ifdef DEBUG_HELPER > printf("sclp(0x%x, 0x%" PRIx64 ")\n", sccb, code); > #endif > @@ -2382,27 +2380,8 @@ int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint32_t sccb, uint64_t code) > return -PGM_SPECIFICATION; > } > > - switch(code) { > - case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO: > - case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO_FORCED: > - while ((ram_size >> (20 + shift)) > 65535) { > - shift++; > - } > - stw_phys(sccb + SCP_MEM_CODE, ram_size >> (20 + shift)); > - stb_phys(sccb + SCP_INCREMENT, 1 << shift); > - stw_phys(sccb + SCP_RESPONSE_CODE, 0x10); > - > - s390_sclp_extint(sccb & ~3); > - break; > - default: > -#ifdef DEBUG_HELPER > - printf("KVM: invalid sclp call 0x%x / 0x%" PRIx64 "x\n", sccb, code); > -#endif > - r = 3; > - break; > - } > - > - return r; > + /* the complex part is handled by external components */ > + return do_sclp_service_call(sccb, code); > } > > /* SCLP service call */ > @@ -2410,7 +2389,7 @@ uint32_t HELPER(servc)(uint32_t r1, uint64_t r2) > { > int r; > > - r = sclp_service_call(env, r1, r2); > + r = sclp_service_call(r1, r2); > if (r < 0) { > program_interrupt(env, -r, 4); > return 0; > -- > 1.7.11.5 >
On 26/09/12 17:00, Alexander Graf wrote: >> +/* Provide information about the configuration, CPUs and storage */ >> +static void read_SCP_info(SCCB *sccb) >> +{ >> + ReadInfo *read_info = (ReadInfo *) sccb; >> + int shift = 0; >> + >> + while ((ram_size >> (20 + shift)) > 65535) { >> + shift++; >> + } >> + read_info->rnmax = cpu_to_be16(ram_size >> (20 + shift)); >> + read_info->rnsize = 1 << shift; > > Any reason we can't just always expose rnmax2 and rnsize2 instead? This way we're quite limited on the amount of RAM we can support, right? Well, we have 65535 * 256 * 1MB == 16TB which is ok for the next 2 or 3 years I guess. There are actually some rules that decide about rnmax vs rnmax2 etc, and here the non-2 are appropriate. This might change for systems > 16TB or systems with memory hotplug, but I would prefer to use those for now. We will add the full logic in case we add memory hotplug. [...] >> + if (be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length) < 8 || > > sizeof(SCCBHeader) ok > >> + be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length) > 4096) { > > SCCB_SIZE ok >> */ >> -int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint32_t sccb, uint64_t code) >> +int sclp_service_call(uint32_t sccb, uint64_t code) > > Why not move the whole thing into sclp.c? The only thing remaining here are a few sanity checks that would just as well work in generic sclp handling code, right? The idea was two-fold: - to have one single place were we cross between target-s390x and hw (review feedback from the first series, originally we had all everything in sclp.c) - to have the checks that the CPU can do over there and the complex things that look into the sccb in sclp.c But we could certainly move that, your take Christian
On 26.09.2012, at 18:06, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 26/09/12 17:00, Alexander Graf wrote: > >>> +/* Provide information about the configuration, CPUs and storage */ >>> +static void read_SCP_info(SCCB *sccb) >>> +{ >>> + ReadInfo *read_info = (ReadInfo *) sccb; >>> + int shift = 0; >>> + >>> + while ((ram_size >> (20 + shift)) > 65535) { >>> + shift++; >>> + } >>> + read_info->rnmax = cpu_to_be16(ram_size >> (20 + shift)); >>> + read_info->rnsize = 1 << shift; >> >> Any reason we can't just always expose rnmax2 and rnsize2 instead? This way we're quite limited on the amount of RAM we can support, right? > > Well, we have 65535 * 256 * 1MB == 16TB which is ok for the next 2 or 3 years I guess. > There are actually some rules that decide about rnmax vs rnmax2 etc, and here > the non-2 are appropriate. This might change for systems > 16TB or systems with memory hotplug, > but I would prefer to use those for now. We will add the full logic in case we add memory > hotplug. Fair enough :). > > > [...] > >>> + if (be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length) < 8 || >> >> sizeof(SCCBHeader) > > ok > > >> >>> + be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length) > 4096) { >> >> SCCB_SIZE > > ok > > >>> */ >>> -int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint32_t sccb, uint64_t code) >>> +int sclp_service_call(uint32_t sccb, uint64_t code) >> >> Why not move the whole thing into sclp.c? The only thing remaining here are a few sanity checks that would just as well work in generic sclp handling code, right? > > The idea was two-fold: > - to have one single place were we cross between target-s390x and hw (review feedback from the first series, originally we had all everything in sclp.c) > - to have the checks that the CPU can do over there and the complex things that look into the sccb in sclp.c > > But we could certainly move that, your take I would still see both fulfilled by having the 2 condition checks in sclp.c. Why don't we need them for kvm? Does kvm check them in the kernel? Alex
On 26/09/12 21:01, Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 26.09.2012, at 18:06, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > >> On 26/09/12 17:00, Alexander Graf wrote: >> >>>> +/* Provide information about the configuration, CPUs and storage */ >>>> +static void read_SCP_info(SCCB *sccb) >>>> +{ >>>> + ReadInfo *read_info = (ReadInfo *) sccb; >>>> + int shift = 0; >>>> + >>>> + while ((ram_size >> (20 + shift)) > 65535) { >>>> + shift++; >>>> + } >>>> + read_info->rnmax = cpu_to_be16(ram_size >> (20 + shift)); >>>> + read_info->rnsize = 1 << shift; >>> >>> Any reason we can't just always expose rnmax2 and rnsize2 instead? This way we're quite limited on the amount of RAM we can support, right? >> >> Well, we have 65535 * 256 * 1MB == 16TB which is ok for the next 2 or 3 years I guess. >> There are actually some rules that decide about rnmax vs rnmax2 etc, and here >> the non-2 are appropriate. This might change for systems > 16TB or systems with memory hotplug, >> but I would prefer to use those for now. We will add the full logic in case we add memory >> hotplug. > > Fair enough :). > >> >> >> [...] >> >>>> + if (be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length) < 8 || >>> >>> sizeof(SCCBHeader) >> >> ok >> >> >>> >>>> + be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length) > 4096) { >>> >>> SCCB_SIZE >> >> ok >> >> >>>> */ >>>> -int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint32_t sccb, uint64_t code) >>>> +int sclp_service_call(uint32_t sccb, uint64_t code) >>> >>> Why not move the whole thing into sclp.c? The only thing remaining here are a few sanity checks that would just as well work in generic sclp handling code, right? >> >> The idea was two-fold: >> - to have one single place were we cross between target-s390x and hw (review feedback from the first series, originally we had all everything in sclp.c) >> - to have the checks that the CPU can do over there and the complex things that look into the sccb in sclp.c >> >> But we could certainly move that, your take > > I would still see both fulfilled by having the 2 condition checks in sclp.c. Why don't we need them for kvm? Does kvm check them in the kernel? KVM needs the checks as well. Thats why kvm calls into sclp_service_call (like the tcg) and then evaluates the return value (like tcg). sclp_service_call is the only place that calls into hw/* code. If we move that code into sclp we have two places that call from target to hw/: kvm.c and op_helper.c (now misc_helper.c). But it really doesnt matter, so lets just move that code. Christian
On 26.09.2012, at 21:25, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 26/09/12 21:01, Alexander Graf wrote: >> >> On 26.09.2012, at 18:06, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> >>> On 26/09/12 17:00, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> >>>>> +/* Provide information about the configuration, CPUs and storage */ >>>>> +static void read_SCP_info(SCCB *sccb) >>>>> +{ >>>>> + ReadInfo *read_info = (ReadInfo *) sccb; >>>>> + int shift = 0; >>>>> + >>>>> + while ((ram_size >> (20 + shift)) > 65535) { >>>>> + shift++; >>>>> + } >>>>> + read_info->rnmax = cpu_to_be16(ram_size >> (20 + shift)); >>>>> + read_info->rnsize = 1 << shift; >>>> >>>> Any reason we can't just always expose rnmax2 and rnsize2 instead? This way we're quite limited on the amount of RAM we can support, right? >>> >>> Well, we have 65535 * 256 * 1MB == 16TB which is ok for the next 2 or 3 years I guess. >>> There are actually some rules that decide about rnmax vs rnmax2 etc, and here >>> the non-2 are appropriate. This might change for systems > 16TB or systems with memory hotplug, >>> but I would prefer to use those for now. We will add the full logic in case we add memory >>> hotplug. >> >> Fair enough :). >> >>> >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>>> + if (be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length) < 8 || >>>> >>>> sizeof(SCCBHeader) >>> >>> ok >>> >>> >>>> >>>>> + be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length) > 4096) { >>>> >>>> SCCB_SIZE >>> >>> ok >>> >>> >>>>> */ >>>>> -int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint32_t sccb, uint64_t code) >>>>> +int sclp_service_call(uint32_t sccb, uint64_t code) >>>> >>>> Why not move the whole thing into sclp.c? The only thing remaining here are a few sanity checks that would just as well work in generic sclp handling code, right? >>> >>> The idea was two-fold: >>> - to have one single place were we cross between target-s390x and hw (review feedback from the first series, originally we had all everything in sclp.c) >>> - to have the checks that the CPU can do over there and the complex things that look into the sccb in sclp.c >>> >>> But we could certainly move that, your take >> >> I would still see both fulfilled by having the 2 condition checks in sclp.c. Why don't we need them for kvm? Does kvm check them in the kernel? > > KVM needs the checks as well. Thats why kvm calls into sclp_service_call (like the tcg) and then evaluates the return value (like tcg). sclp_service_call is the only place that calls into hw/* code. If we move that code into sclp we have two places that call from target to hw/: kvm.c and op_helper.c (now misc_helper.c). But it really doesnt matter, so lets just move that code. Ah! Yes, please just call into sclp.c from kvm.c :). Alex
diff --git a/hw/s390x/Makefile.objs b/hw/s390x/Makefile.objs index dcdcac8..1c14b96 100644 --- a/hw/s390x/Makefile.objs +++ b/hw/s390x/Makefile.objs @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ obj-y = s390-virtio-bus.o s390-virtio.o obj-y := $(addprefix ../,$(obj-y)) +obj-y += sclp.o diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..322a0e2 --- /dev/null +++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c @@ -0,0 +1,107 @@ +/* + * SCLP Support + * + * Copyright IBM, Corp. 2012 + * + * Authors: + * Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> + * Heinz Graalfs <graalfs@linux.vnet.ibm.com> + * + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or (at your + * option) any later version. See the COPYING file in the top-level directory. + * + */ + +#include "cpu.h" +#include "kvm.h" + +#include "sclp.h" + +/* Provide information about the configuration, CPUs and storage */ +static void read_SCP_info(SCCB *sccb) +{ + ReadInfo *read_info = (ReadInfo *) sccb; + int shift = 0; + + while ((ram_size >> (20 + shift)) > 65535) { + shift++; + } + read_info->rnmax = cpu_to_be16(ram_size >> (20 + shift)); + read_info->rnsize = 1 << shift; + sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_NORMAL_READ_COMPLETION); +} + +static void sclp_execute(SCCB *sccb, uint64_t code) +{ + switch (code) { + case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO: + case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO_FORCED: + read_SCP_info(sccb); + break; + default: + sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND); + break; + } +} + +int do_sclp_service_call(uint32_t sccb, uint64_t code) +{ + int r = 0; + SCCB work_sccb; + + target_phys_addr_t sccb_len = sizeof(SCCB); + + /* + * we want to work on a private copy of the sccb, to prevent guests + * from playing dirty tricks by modifying the memory content after + * the host has checked the values + */ + cpu_physical_memory_read(sccb, &work_sccb, sccb_len); + + /* Valid sccb sizes */ + if (be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length) < 8 || + be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length) > 4096) { + r = -PGM_SPECIFICATION; + goto out; + } + + sclp_execute((SCCB *)&work_sccb, code); + + cpu_physical_memory_write(sccb, &work_sccb, + be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length)); + + sclp_service_interrupt(sccb); + +out: + return r; +} + +void sclp_service_interrupt(uint32_t sccb) +{ + s390_sclp_extint(sccb & ~3); +} + +/* qemu object creation and initialization functions */ + +static void s390_sclp_device_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data) +{ + SysBusDeviceClass *dc = SYS_BUS_DEVICE_CLASS(klass); + + dc->init = s390_sclp_dev_init; +} + +static TypeInfo s390_sclp_device_info = { + .name = TYPE_DEVICE_S390_SCLP, + .parent = TYPE_SYS_BUS_DEVICE, + .instance_size = sizeof(S390SCLPDevice), + .class_init = s390_sclp_device_class_init, + .class_size = sizeof(S390SCLPDeviceClass), + .abstract = true, +}; + +static void s390_sclp_register_types(void) +{ + type_register_static(&s390_sclp_device_info); +} + +type_init(s390_sclp_register_types) diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.h b/hw/s390x/sclp.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e9ad42b --- /dev/null +++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.h @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ +/* + * SCLP Support + * + * Copyright IBM, Corp. 2012 + * + * Authors: + * Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> + * + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or (at your + * option) any later version. See the COPYING file in the top-level directory. + * + */ + +#ifndef HW_S390_SCLP_H +#define HW_S390_SCLP_H + +#include <hw/sysbus.h> +#include <hw/qdev.h> + +/* SCLP command codes */ +#define SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO 0x00020001 +#define SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO_FORCED 0x00120001 + +/* SCLP response codes */ +#define SCLP_RC_NORMAL_READ_COMPLETION 0x0010 +#define SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND 0x01f0 + +/* Service Call Control Block (SCCB) and its elements */ + +#define SCCB_SIZE 4096 + +/* + * Normally packed structures are not the right thing to do, since all code + * must take care of endianess. We cant use ldl_phys and friends for two + * reasons, though: + * - some of the embedded structures below the SCCB can appear multiple times + * at different locations, so there is no fixed offset + * - we work on a private copy of the SCCB, since there are several length + * fields, that would cause a security nightmare if we allow the guest to + * alter the structure while we parse it. We cannot use ldl_p and friends + * either without doing pointer arithmetics + * So we have to double check that all users of sclp data structures use the + * right endianess wrappers. + */ +typedef struct SCCBHeader { + uint16_t length; + uint8_t function_code; + uint8_t control_mask[3]; + uint16_t response_code; +} QEMU_PACKED SCCBHeader; + +#define SCCB_DATA_LEN (SCCB_SIZE - sizeof(SCCBHeader)) + +typedef struct ReadInfo { + SCCBHeader h; + uint16_t rnmax; + uint8_t rnsize; +} QEMU_PACKED ReadInfo; + +typedef struct SCCB { + SCCBHeader h; + char data[SCCB_DATA_LEN]; + } QEMU_PACKED SCCB; + +typedef struct S390SCLPDevice { + SysBusDevice busdev; +} S390SCLPDevice; + +typedef struct S390SCLPDeviceClass { + DeviceClass qdev; + int (*init)(S390SCLPDevice *sdev); +} S390SCLPDeviceClass; + +void sclp_service_interrupt(uint32_t sccb); + +#endif diff --git a/target-s390x/cpu.h b/target-s390x/cpu.h index 18ac6e3..efd2cda 100644 --- a/target-s390x/cpu.h +++ b/target-s390x/cpu.h @@ -294,6 +294,7 @@ void s390x_tod_timer(void *opaque); void s390x_cpu_timer(void *opaque); int s390_virtio_hypercall(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t mem, uint64_t hypercall); +int do_sclp_service_call(uint32_t sccb, uint64_t code); #ifdef CONFIG_KVM void kvm_s390_interrupt(CPUS390XState *env, int type, uint32_t code); @@ -596,17 +597,6 @@ static inline const char *cc_name(int cc_op) return cc_names[cc_op]; } -/* SCLP PV interface defines */ -#define SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO 0x00020001 -#define SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO_FORCED 0x00120001 - -#define SCP_LENGTH 0x00 -#define SCP_FUNCTION_CODE 0x02 -#define SCP_CONTROL_MASK 0x03 -#define SCP_RESPONSE_CODE 0x06 -#define SCP_MEM_CODE 0x08 -#define SCP_INCREMENT 0x0a - typedef struct LowCore { /* prefix area: defined by architecture */ @@ -955,7 +945,7 @@ static inline void ebcdic_put(uint8_t *p, const char *ascii, int len) void load_psw(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t mask, uint64_t addr); int mmu_translate(CPUS390XState *env, target_ulong vaddr, int rw, uint64_t asc, target_ulong *raddr, int *flags); -int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint32_t sccb, uint64_t code); +int sclp_service_call(uint32_t sccb, uint64_t code); uint32_t calc_cc(CPUS390XState *env, uint32_t cc_op, uint64_t src, uint64_t dst, uint64_t vr); diff --git a/target-s390x/kvm.c b/target-s390x/kvm.c index 07edf93..bcb6b2e 100644 --- a/target-s390x/kvm.c +++ b/target-s390x/kvm.c @@ -60,9 +60,6 @@ #define SIGP_STORE_STATUS_ADDR 0x0e #define SIGP_SET_ARCH 0x12 -#define SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO 0x00020001 -#define SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO_FORCED 0x00120001 - const KVMCapabilityInfo kvm_arch_required_capabilities[] = { KVM_CAP_LAST_INFO }; @@ -272,7 +269,7 @@ static int kvm_sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, struct kvm_run *run, sccb = env->regs[ipbh0 & 0xf]; code = env->regs[(ipbh0 & 0xf0) >> 4]; - r = sclp_service_call(env, sccb, code); + r = sclp_service_call(sccb, code); if (r < 0) { enter_pgmcheck(env, -r); } diff --git a/target-s390x/op_helper.c b/target-s390x/op_helper.c index abc35dd..e7bb980 100644 --- a/target-s390x/op_helper.c +++ b/target-s390x/op_helper.c @@ -2363,13 +2363,11 @@ static void program_interrupt(CPUS390XState *env, uint32_t code, int ilc) } /* + * we handle here the part that belongs to the cpu, e.g. program checks * ret < 0 indicates program check, ret = 0,1,2,3 -> cc */ -int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint32_t sccb, uint64_t code) +int sclp_service_call(uint32_t sccb, uint64_t code) { - int r = 0; - int shift = 0; - #ifdef DEBUG_HELPER printf("sclp(0x%x, 0x%" PRIx64 ")\n", sccb, code); #endif @@ -2382,27 +2380,8 @@ int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint32_t sccb, uint64_t code) return -PGM_SPECIFICATION; } - switch(code) { - case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO: - case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO_FORCED: - while ((ram_size >> (20 + shift)) > 65535) { - shift++; - } - stw_phys(sccb + SCP_MEM_CODE, ram_size >> (20 + shift)); - stb_phys(sccb + SCP_INCREMENT, 1 << shift); - stw_phys(sccb + SCP_RESPONSE_CODE, 0x10); - - s390_sclp_extint(sccb & ~3); - break; - default: -#ifdef DEBUG_HELPER - printf("KVM: invalid sclp call 0x%x / 0x%" PRIx64 "x\n", sccb, code); -#endif - r = 3; - break; - } - - return r; + /* the complex part is handled by external components */ + return do_sclp_service_call(sccb, code); } /* SCLP service call */ @@ -2410,7 +2389,7 @@ uint32_t HELPER(servc)(uint32_t r1, uint64_t r2) { int r; - r = sclp_service_call(env, r1, r2); + r = sclp_service_call(r1, r2); if (r < 0) { program_interrupt(env, -r, 4); return 0;