| Message ID | 1345970251-2029-1-git-send-email-juhosg@openwrt.org |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | 58d864ed208dd2495314fde104b4615fa58e18c8 |
| Headers | show |
On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 10:37 +0200, Gabor Juhos wrote: > Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <juhosg@openwrt.org> > --- > drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c > index 5d0d68c..d812552 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c > @@ -638,6 +638,7 @@ static const struct spi_device_id m25p_ids[] = { > { "en25p32", INFO(0x1c2016, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, 0) }, > { "en25q32b", INFO(0x1c3016, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, 0) }, > { "en25p64", INFO(0x1c2017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, 0) }, > + { "en25q64", INFO(0x1c3017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, SECT_4K) }, I've already pushed a similar patch from "John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>", but it did not have "SECT_4K". So I am not picking this one.
On 29/08/12 13:04, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 10:37 +0200, Gabor Juhos wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <juhosg@openwrt.org> >> --- >> drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c >> index 5d0d68c..d812552 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c >> @@ -638,6 +638,7 @@ static const struct spi_device_id m25p_ids[] = { >> { "en25p32", INFO(0x1c2016, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, 0) }, >> { "en25q32b", INFO(0x1c3016, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, 0) }, >> { "en25p64", INFO(0x1c2017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, 0) }, >> + { "en25q64", INFO(0x1c3017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, SECT_4K) }, > I've already pushed a similar patch from "John Crispin > <blogic@openwrt.org>", but it did not have "SECT_4K". So I am not > picking this one. > Hi Artem, the patch is based on this ticket -> https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/12077 i verified it against the datasheet. the datasheet indicates that SECT_4K should work, but as the patch was only runtime tested without the SECT_4K i did not add it. Gabor told me that the SECT_4K was runtime tested on the en25q32 which is from the same family. I have put the submitter of patch in CC, maybe he can test with the SECT_4K set. Thanks, John
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c index 5d0d68c..d812552 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c @@ -638,6 +638,7 @@ static const struct spi_device_id m25p_ids[] = { { "en25p32", INFO(0x1c2016, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, 0) }, { "en25q32b", INFO(0x1c3016, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, 0) }, { "en25p64", INFO(0x1c2017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, 0) }, + { "en25q64", INFO(0x1c3017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, SECT_4K) }, /* Everspin */ { "mr25h256", CAT25_INFO( 32 * 1024, 1, 256, 2) },
Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <juhosg@openwrt.org> --- drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)