diff mbox

[net-next,04/13] e1000e: cleanup checkpatch PREFER_PR_LEVEL warning

Message ID 1345715813-20757-5-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com
State Accepted, archived
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show

Commit Message

Kirsher, Jeffrey T Aug. 23, 2012, 9:56 a.m. UTC 
From: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>

checkpatch warning: Prefer pr_info(... to printk(KERN_INFO, ...

Signed-off-by: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comments

Joe Perches Aug. 23, 2012, 2:01 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 02:56 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> From: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>
> 
> checkpatch warning: Prefer pr_info(... to printk(KERN_INFO, ...
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
[]
> @@ -4330,9 +4330,8 @@ static void e1000_print_link_info(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
>  	u32 ctrl = er32(CTRL);
>  
>  	/* Link status message must follow this format for user tools */
> -	printk(KERN_INFO "e1000e: %s NIC Link is Up %d Mbps %s Duplex, Flow Control: %s\n",
> -		adapter->netdev->name,
> -		adapter->link_speed,
> +	pr_info("e1000e: %s NIC Link is Up %d Mbps %s Duplex, Flow Control: %s\n",
> +		adapter->netdev->name, adapter->link_speed,
>  		adapter->link_duplex == FULL_DUPLEX ? "Full" : "Half",
>  		(ctrl & E1000_CTRL_TFCE) && (ctrl & E1000_CTRL_RFCE) ? "Rx/Tx" :
>  		(ctrl & E1000_CTRL_RFCE) ? "Rx" :

I think these conversions are not a good idea.

When you have a specific message format that must be
followed, use printk.

pr_<level> may at some point in the near future use
#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUiLD_MODNAME ": " fmt
as a global default equivalent.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Joe Perches Aug. 24, 2012, 6:02 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 07:01 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 02:56 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > From: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>
> > 
> > checkpatch warning: Prefer pr_info(... to printk(KERN_INFO, ...
> []
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> []
> > @@ -4330,9 +4330,8 @@ static void e1000_print_link_info(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
> >  	u32 ctrl = er32(CTRL);
> >  
> >  	/* Link status message must follow this format for user tools */
> > -	printk(KERN_INFO "e1000e: %s NIC Link is Up %d Mbps %s Duplex, Flow Control: %s\n",
> > -		adapter->netdev->name,
> > -		adapter->link_speed,
> > +	pr_info("e1000e: %s NIC Link is Up %d Mbps %s Duplex, Flow Control: %s\n",
> > +		adapter->netdev->name, adapter->link_speed,
> >  		adapter->link_duplex == FULL_DUPLEX ? "Full" : "Half",
> >  		(ctrl & E1000_CTRL_TFCE) && (ctrl & E1000_CTRL_RFCE) ? "Rx/Tx" :
> >  		(ctrl & E1000_CTRL_RFCE) ? "Rx" :
> 
> I think these conversions are not a good idea.
> 
> When you have a specific message format that must be
> followed, use printk.
> 
> pr_<level> may at some point in the near future use
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUiLD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> as a global default equivalent.

Hey Jeff.

The comment above this change (and the other) reads

  	/* Link status message must follow this format for user tools */

This file already uses #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME...
With this patch, the output form changes to use 2 prefixes.

Is that really desired?  Probably not.

If the comments are old and don't apply any more, they
should be removed.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Kirsher, Jeffrey T Aug. 24, 2012, 9:19 p.m. UTC | #3 
On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 11:02 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 07:01 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 02:56 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > > From: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>
> > > 
> > > checkpatch warning: Prefer pr_info(... to printk(KERN_INFO, ...
> > []
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> > []
> > > @@ -4330,9 +4330,8 @@ static void e1000_print_link_info(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
> > >  	u32 ctrl = er32(CTRL);
> > >  
> > >  	/* Link status message must follow this format for user tools */
> > > -	printk(KERN_INFO "e1000e: %s NIC Link is Up %d Mbps %s Duplex, Flow Control: %s\n",
> > > -		adapter->netdev->name,
> > > -		adapter->link_speed,
> > > +	pr_info("e1000e: %s NIC Link is Up %d Mbps %s Duplex, Flow Control: %s\n",
> > > +		adapter->netdev->name, adapter->link_speed,
> > >  		adapter->link_duplex == FULL_DUPLEX ? "Full" : "Half",
> > >  		(ctrl & E1000_CTRL_TFCE) && (ctrl & E1000_CTRL_RFCE) ? "Rx/Tx" :
> > >  		(ctrl & E1000_CTRL_RFCE) ? "Rx" :
> > 
> > I think these conversions are not a good idea.
> > 
> > When you have a specific message format that must be
> > followed, use printk.
> > 
> > pr_<level> may at some point in the near future use
> > #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUiLD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> > as a global default equivalent.
> 
> Hey Jeff.
> 
> The comment above this change (and the other) reads
> 
>   	/* Link status message must follow this format for user tools */
> 
> This file already uses #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME...
> With this patch, the output form changes to use 2 prefixes.
> 
> Is that really desired?  Probably not.
> 
> If the comments are old and don't apply any more, they
> should be removed.
> 

Bruce really should answer this since this is his patch and there was a
reason why he made the change.  My guess was the current output was
providing incorrect or mis-leading information.
Joe Perches Aug. 24, 2012, 10:43 p.m. UTC | #4 
On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 14:19 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 11:02 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 07:01 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 02:56 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > > > From: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>
> > > > 
> > > > checkpatch warning: Prefer pr_info(... to printk(KERN_INFO, ...
> > > []
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> > > []
> > > > @@ -4330,9 +4330,8 @@ static void e1000_print_link_info(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
> > > >  	u32 ctrl = er32(CTRL);
> > > >  
> > > >  	/* Link status message must follow this format for user tools */
> > > > -	printk(KERN_INFO "e1000e: %s NIC Link is Up %d Mbps %s Duplex, Flow Control: %s\n",
> > > > -		adapter->netdev->name,
> > > > -		adapter->link_speed,
> > > > +	pr_info("e1000e: %s NIC Link is Up %d Mbps %s Duplex, Flow Control: %s\n",
> > > > +		adapter->netdev->name, adapter->link_speed,
> > > >  		adapter->link_duplex == FULL_DUPLEX ? "Full" : "Half",
> > > >  		(ctrl & E1000_CTRL_TFCE) && (ctrl & E1000_CTRL_RFCE) ? "Rx/Tx" :
> > > >  		(ctrl & E1000_CTRL_RFCE) ? "Rx" :
[]
> > The comment above this change (and the other) reads
> > 
> >   	/* Link status message must follow this format for user tools */
> > 
> > This file already uses #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME...
> > With this patch, the output form changes to use 2 prefixes.
> > 
> > Is that really desired?  Probably not.
> > 
> > If the comments are old and don't apply any more, they
> > should be removed.
> > 
> Bruce really should answer this since this is his patch and there was a
> reason why he made the change.  My guess was the current output was
> providing incorrect or mis-leading information.

My guess is he was just shutting up checkpatch and
didn't notice the newly doubled prefix.

happy weekend...

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
index e4d8041..bc611b4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
@@ -4330,9 +4330,8 @@  static void e1000_print_link_info(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
 	u32 ctrl = er32(CTRL);
 
 	/* Link status message must follow this format for user tools */
-	printk(KERN_INFO "e1000e: %s NIC Link is Up %d Mbps %s Duplex, Flow Control: %s\n",
-		adapter->netdev->name,
-		adapter->link_speed,
+	pr_info("e1000e: %s NIC Link is Up %d Mbps %s Duplex, Flow Control: %s\n",
+		adapter->netdev->name, adapter->link_speed,
 		adapter->link_duplex == FULL_DUPLEX ? "Full" : "Half",
 		(ctrl & E1000_CTRL_TFCE) && (ctrl & E1000_CTRL_RFCE) ? "Rx/Tx" :
 		(ctrl & E1000_CTRL_RFCE) ? "Rx" :
@@ -4558,8 +4557,8 @@  static void e1000_watchdog_task(struct work_struct *work)
 			adapter->link_speed = 0;
 			adapter->link_duplex = 0;
 			/* Link status message must follow this format */
-			printk(KERN_INFO "e1000e: %s NIC Link is Down\n",
-			       adapter->netdev->name);
+			pr_info("e1000e: %s NIC Link is Down\n",
+				adapter->netdev->name);
 			netif_carrier_off(netdev);
 			if (!test_bit(__E1000_DOWN, &adapter->state))
 				mod_timer(&adapter->phy_info_timer,