Message ID | 349024d7fa11333093d09a518dcbbc371c296700.1345433485.git.jesse.sung@canonical.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Seems like all of these ought to be coming via stable. Have you mentioned any of these patches on the stable mailing list? rtg
Ack for the whole series.
Are you sure http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035348 is the right bug number ?
2012/8/20 Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>: > Seems like all of these ought to be coming via stable. Have you mentioned > any of these patches on the stable mailing list? No, I haven't. Should I send them to stable instead of SRU? Thanks, Jesse
2012/8/20 Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>: > Are you sure http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035348 is the right bug > number ? It's a private bug in the beginning, and it's public now. Sorry for that. Thanks, Jesse
On 08/20/2012 08:49 PM, Jesse Sung wrote: > 2012/8/20 Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>: >> Seems like all of these ought to be coming via stable. Have you mentioned >> any of these patches on the stable mailing list? > > No, I haven't. Should I send them to stable instead of SRU? > > Thanks, > Jesse > Lets do both so that the rest of the community can benefit. You might want to refresh your memory of stable procedures by reviewing Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt in the kernel repo. Be sure to mention to which kernel version(s) that these patches apply. rtg
Applied all 5 patches
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be_main.c index 77c536e..32c1ad4 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be_main.c @@ -3103,7 +3103,7 @@ static void be_netdev_init(struct net_device *netdev) netdev->flags |= IFF_MULTICAST; - netif_set_gso_max_size(netdev, 65535); + netif_set_gso_max_size(netdev, 65535 - ETH_HLEN); BE_SET_NETDEV_OPS(netdev, &be_netdev_ops);