| Message ID | CAK5ve-+wWWARGz4ky_VW2AK7hHLXENkw2ANToLztcDjsegubsw@mail.gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@canonical.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@canonical.com> wrote: >> Russell, Arnd and Olof, >> > > I felt very sorry about this issue, the email was archived > automatically in my Gmail account. I found the root cause of the issue > Russell met and actually that code about trigger_data is totally > useless, which was removed just now. I pushed an update version again > to the same branch of my git tree. Please consider a pull. If I did > something bad, please let me know, I will fix it as soon as possible. Hi, We'll pull this in for staging again once the merge window is done. It's definitely not 3.6 material at this time. -Olof
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@canonical.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@canonical.com> wrote: >>> Russell, Arnd and Olof, >>> >> >> I felt very sorry about this issue, the email was archived >> automatically in my Gmail account. I found the root cause of the issue >> Russell met and actually that code about trigger_data is totally >> useless, which was removed just now. I pushed an update version again >> to the same branch of my git tree. Please consider a pull. If I did >> something bad, please let me know, I will fix it as soon as possible. > > Hi, > > We'll pull this in for staging again once the merge window is done. > It's definitely not 3.6 material at this time. > OK, I will rebase to 3.6-rc1 after merge window close and send out pull request again. Thanks,
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@canonical.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@canonical.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@canonical.com> wrote: >>>> Russell, Arnd and Olof, >>>> >>> >>> I felt very sorry about this issue, the email was archived >>> automatically in my Gmail account. I found the root cause of the issue >>> Russell met and actually that code about trigger_data is totally >>> useless, which was removed just now. I pushed an update version again >>> to the same branch of my git tree. Please consider a pull. If I did >>> something bad, please let me know, I will fix it as soon as possible. >> >> Hi, >> >> We'll pull this in for staging again once the merge window is done. >> It's definitely not 3.6 material at this time. >> > > OK, I will rebase to 3.6-rc1 after merge window close and send out > pull request again. No need to rebase unless there are large merge conflicts. -Olof
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@canonical.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@canonical.com> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@canonical.com> wrote: >>>>> Russell, Arnd and Olof, >>>>> >>>> >>>> I felt very sorry about this issue, the email was archived >>>> automatically in my Gmail account. I found the root cause of the issue >>>> Russell met and actually that code about trigger_data is totally >>>> useless, which was removed just now. I pushed an update version again >>>> to the same branch of my git tree. Please consider a pull. If I did >>>> something bad, please let me know, I will fix it as soon as possible. >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> We'll pull this in for staging again once the merge window is done. >>> It's definitely not 3.6 material at this time. >>> >> >> OK, I will rebase to 3.6-rc1 after merge window close and send out >> pull request again. > > No need to rebase unless there are large merge conflicts. > Olof, could you please consider pull again this branch? I keep it based on 3.5 release. Thanks, -Bryan
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 02:57:18PM +0800, Bryan Wu wrote: > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@canonical.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote: > >>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@canonical.com> wrote: > >>>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@canonical.com> wrote: > >>>>> Russell, Arnd and Olof, > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> I felt very sorry about this issue, the email was archived > >>>> automatically in my Gmail account. I found the root cause of the issue > >>>> Russell met and actually that code about trigger_data is totally > >>>> useless, which was removed just now. I pushed an update version again > >>>> to the same branch of my git tree. Please consider a pull. If I did > >>>> something bad, please let me know, I will fix it as soon as possible. > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> We'll pull this in for staging again once the merge window is done. > >>> It's definitely not 3.6 material at this time. > >>> > >> > >> OK, I will rebase to 3.6-rc1 after merge window close and send out > >> pull request again. > > > > No need to rebase unless there are large merge conflicts. > > > > Olof, could you please consider pull again this branch? I keep it > based on 3.5 release. So what's the fix you've applied? I don't think you've posted any patches.
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 02:57:18PM +0800, Bryan Wu wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote: >> > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@canonical.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@canonical.com> wrote: >> >>>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@canonical.com> wrote: >> >>>>> Russell, Arnd and Olof, >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> I felt very sorry about this issue, the email was archived >> >>>> automatically in my Gmail account. I found the root cause of the issue >> >>>> Russell met and actually that code about trigger_data is totally >> >>>> useless, which was removed just now. I pushed an update version again >> >>>> to the same branch of my git tree. Please consider a pull. If I did >> >>>> something bad, please let me know, I will fix it as soon as possible. >> >>> >> >>> Hi, >> >>> >> >>> We'll pull this in for staging again once the merge window is done. >> >>> It's definitely not 3.6 material at this time. >> >>> >> >> >> >> OK, I will rebase to 3.6-rc1 after merge window close and send out >> >> pull request again. >> > >> > No need to rebase unless there are large merge conflicts. >> > >> >> Olof, could you please consider pull again this branch? I keep it >> based on 3.5 release. > > So what's the fix you've applied? I don't think you've posted any patches. I assume I need update my branch instead of posting some incremental patches, since my branch was dropped. So I prepared a new branch including the fixing. Need I post my fix? But I don't keep the old version. Olof and Arnd, maybe you guys keep my old version. Thanks,
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012, Bryan Wu wrote: > On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux > <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 02:57:18PM +0800, Bryan Wu wrote: > >> Olof, could you please consider pull again this branch? I keep it > >> based on 3.5 release. > > > > So what's the fix you've applied? I don't think you've posted any patches. > > I assume I need update my branch instead of posting some incremental > patches, since my branch was dropped. So I prepared a new branch > including the fixing. > > Need I post my fix? But I don't keep the old version. > Olof and Arnd, maybe you guys keep my old version. You should post the new version of the patch that Russell previously objected to. Nicolas